TSTP Solution File: SET864-2 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : SET864-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:21:10 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.21s 0.50s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.21s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 16 ( 7 unt; 0 nHn; 16 RR)
% Number of literals : 30 ( 6 equ; 18 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 15 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_Zorn_Omaxchain__Zorn_0,axiom,
( c_Union(X4,X3) = X1
| ~ c_in(X1,X2,tc_set(X3))
| ~ c_in(X4,c_Zorn_Omaxchain(X2,X3),tc_set(tc_set(X3)))
| ~ c_lessequals(c_Union(X4,X3),X1,tc_set(X3)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.s0ZhUv5ykb/E---3.1_12110.p',cls_Zorn_Omaxchain__Zorn_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
c_in(v_c,c_Zorn_Omaxchain(v_S,t_a),tc_set(tc_set(t_a))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.s0ZhUv5ykb/E---3.1_12110.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_5,negated_conjecture,
( X1 != v_x(X1)
| ~ c_in(X1,v_S,tc_set(t_a)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.s0ZhUv5ykb/E---3.1_12110.p',cls_conjecture_5) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_2,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Union(v_c,t_a),v_S,tc_set(t_a)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.s0ZhUv5ykb/E---3.1_12110.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_4,negated_conjecture,
( c_lessequals(X1,v_x(X1),tc_set(t_a))
| ~ c_in(X1,v_S,tc_set(t_a)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.s0ZhUv5ykb/E---3.1_12110.p',cls_conjecture_4) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_3,negated_conjecture,
( c_in(v_x(X1),v_S,tc_set(t_a))
| ~ c_in(X1,v_S,tc_set(t_a)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.s0ZhUv5ykb/E---3.1_12110.p',cls_conjecture_3) ).
cnf(c_0_6,axiom,
( c_Union(X4,X3) = X1
| ~ c_in(X1,X2,tc_set(X3))
| ~ c_in(X4,c_Zorn_Omaxchain(X2,X3),tc_set(tc_set(X3)))
| ~ c_lessequals(c_Union(X4,X3),X1,tc_set(X3)) ),
cls_Zorn_Omaxchain__Zorn_0 ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
c_in(v_c,c_Zorn_Omaxchain(v_S,t_a),tc_set(tc_set(t_a))),
cls_conjecture_0 ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
( X1 != v_x(X1)
| ~ c_in(X1,v_S,tc_set(t_a)) ),
cls_conjecture_5 ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Union(v_c,t_a),v_S,tc_set(t_a)),
cls_conjecture_2 ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
( c_Union(v_c,t_a) = X1
| ~ c_lessequals(c_Union(v_c,t_a),X1,tc_set(t_a))
| ~ c_in(X1,v_S,tc_set(t_a)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
( c_lessequals(X1,v_x(X1),tc_set(t_a))
| ~ c_in(X1,v_S,tc_set(t_a)) ),
cls_conjecture_4 ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
v_x(c_Union(v_c,t_a)) != c_Union(v_c,t_a),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(v_x(c_Union(v_c,t_a)),v_S,tc_set(t_a)),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_9])]),c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
( c_in(v_x(X1),v_S,tc_set(t_a))
| ~ c_in(X1,v_S,tc_set(t_a)) ),
cls_conjecture_3 ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_9])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.13 % Problem : SET864-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.08/0.14 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.15/0.35 % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.35 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.15/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.35 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 17:34:34 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.49 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.21/0.49 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.s0ZhUv5ykb/E---3.1_12110.p
% 0.21/0.50 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.21/0.50 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.50 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # new_bool_3 with pid 12231 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.21/0.50 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.50 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.21/0.50 # Search class: FHHSF-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.50 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 181s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 12236 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.21/0.50 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.50 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.21/0.50 # Search class: FHHSF-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.50 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 181s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.21/0.50 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.21/0.50
% 0.21/0.50 # Proof found!
% 0.21/0.50 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.21/0.50 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.50 # Parsed axioms : 6
% 0.21/0.50 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Initial clauses : 6
% 0.21/0.50 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Initial clauses in saturation : 6
% 0.21/0.50 # Processed clauses : 16
% 0.21/0.50 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # ...remaining for further processing : 16
% 0.21/0.50 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Generated clauses : 5
% 0.21/0.50 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 4
% 0.21/0.50 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Paramodulations : 5
% 0.21/0.50 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # NegExts : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Total rewrite steps : 2
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50 # Current number of processed clauses : 10
% 0.21/0.50 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 2
% 0.21/0.50 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.21/0.50 # Non-unit-clauses : 6
% 0.21/0.50 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.21/0.50 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Current number of archived clauses : 6
% 0.21/0.50 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 10
% 0.21/0.50 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 7
% 0.21/0.50 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.21/0.50 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Termbank termtop insertions : 329
% 0.21/0.50
% 0.21/0.50 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.50 # User time : 0.002 s
% 0.21/0.50 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.21/0.50 # Total time : 0.004 s
% 0.21/0.50 # Maximum resident set size: 1636 pages
% 0.21/0.50
% 0.21/0.50 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.50 # User time : 0.004 s
% 0.21/0.50 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.21/0.50 # Total time : 0.007 s
% 0.21/0.50 # Maximum resident set size: 1676 pages
% 0.21/0.50 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.21/0.51 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------