TSTP Solution File: SET860-1 by iProver---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9
% Problem : SET860-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 3 03:01:51 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 64.67s 9.73s
% Output : CNFRefutation 64.67s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 11
% Number of leaves : 9
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 21 ( 4 unt; 9 nHn; 19 RR)
% Number of literals : 53 ( 0 equ; 24 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 4 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 38 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_49,negated_conjecture,
~ c_lessequals(c_Union(v_C,t_a),v_A,tc_set(t_a)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(c_50,negated_conjecture,
~ c_lessequals(v_B,c_Union(v_C,t_a),tc_set(t_a)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).
cnf(c_51,negated_conjecture,
( ~ c_in(X0,v_C,tc_set(t_a))
| c_lessequals(X0,v_A,tc_set(t_a))
| c_lessequals(v_B,X0,tc_set(t_a)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).
cnf(c_150,plain,
( ~ c_in(X0,c_Union(X1,X2),X2)
| c_in(c_Main_OUnionE__1(X0,X1,X2),X1,tc_set(X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/MSC001-0.ax',cls_Set_OUnionE_0) ).
cnf(c_151,plain,
( ~ c_in(X0,c_Union(X1,X2),X2)
| c_in(X0,c_Main_OUnionE__1(X0,X1,X2),X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/MSC001-0.ax',cls_Set_OUnionE_1) ).
cnf(c_159,plain,
( ~ c_lessequals(X0,X1,tc_set(X2))
| ~ c_in(X3,X0,X2)
| c_in(X3,X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/MSC001-0.ax',cls_Set_OsubsetD_0) ).
cnf(c_160,plain,
( c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(X0,X1,X2),X0,X2)
| c_lessequals(X0,X1,tc_set(X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/MSC001-0.ax',cls_Set_OsubsetI_0) ).
cnf(c_161,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(X0,X1,X2),X1,X2)
| c_lessequals(X0,X1,tc_set(X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/MSC001-0.ax',cls_Set_OsubsetI_1) ).
cnf(c_1383,plain,
( ~ c_in(X0,X1,tc_set(X2))
| ~ c_in(X3,X0,X2)
| c_in(X3,c_Union(X1,X2),X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/MSC001-2.ax',cls_Set_OUnionI_0) ).
cnf(c_72842,plain,
( ~ c_in(X0,c_Union(v_C,t_a),t_a)
| c_lessequals(c_Main_OUnionE__1(X0,v_C,t_a),v_A,tc_set(t_a))
| c_lessequals(v_B,c_Main_OUnionE__1(X0,v_C,t_a),tc_set(t_a)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_150,c_51]) ).
cnf(c_72990,plain,
( ~ c_in(X0,c_Main_OUnionE__1(X1,v_C,t_a),t_a)
| ~ c_in(X1,c_Union(v_C,t_a),t_a)
| c_lessequals(v_B,c_Main_OUnionE__1(X1,v_C,t_a),tc_set(t_a))
| c_in(X0,v_A,t_a) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_72842,c_159]) ).
cnf(c_73042,plain,
( ~ c_in(X0,c_Union(v_C,t_a),t_a)
| c_lessequals(v_B,c_Main_OUnionE__1(X0,v_C,t_a),tc_set(t_a))
| c_in(X0,v_A,t_a) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_151,c_72990]) ).
cnf(c_73057,plain,
( ~ c_in(X0,c_Union(v_C,t_a),t_a)
| ~ c_in(X1,v_B,t_a)
| c_in(X1,c_Main_OUnionE__1(X0,v_C,t_a),t_a)
| c_in(X0,v_A,t_a) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_73042,c_159]) ).
cnf(c_73748,plain,
( ~ c_in(X0,c_Main_OUnionE__1(X1,X2,X3),X3)
| ~ c_in(X1,c_Union(X2,X3),X3)
| c_in(X0,c_Union(X2,X3),X3) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_150,c_1383]) ).
cnf(c_73849,plain,
( ~ c_in(X0,c_Union(v_C,t_a),t_a)
| ~ c_in(X1,v_B,t_a)
| c_in(X1,c_Union(v_C,t_a),t_a)
| c_in(X0,v_A,t_a) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_73057,c_73748]) ).
cnf(c_73957,plain,
( ~ c_in(X0,v_B,t_a)
| c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(c_Union(v_C,t_a),X1,t_a),v_A,t_a)
| c_lessequals(c_Union(v_C,t_a),X1,tc_set(t_a))
| c_in(X0,c_Union(v_C,t_a),t_a) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_160,c_73849]) ).
cnf(c_73966,plain,
( ~ c_in(X0,v_B,t_a)
| c_lessequals(c_Union(v_C,t_a),v_A,tc_set(t_a))
| c_in(X0,c_Union(v_C,t_a),t_a) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_73957,c_161]) ).
cnf(c_73967,plain,
( ~ c_in(X0,v_B,t_a)
| c_in(X0,c_Union(v_C,t_a),t_a) ),
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_73966,c_49]) ).
cnf(c_73975,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(X0,c_Union(v_C,t_a),t_a),v_B,t_a)
| c_lessequals(X0,c_Union(v_C,t_a),tc_set(t_a)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_73967,c_161]) ).
cnf(c_73982,plain,
c_lessequals(v_B,c_Union(v_C,t_a),tc_set(t_a)),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_160,c_73975]) ).
cnf(c_73983,plain,
$false,
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_73982,c_50]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.13 % Problem : SET860-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.11/0.14 % Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.15/0.35 % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.35 % DateTime : Thu May 2 20:14:55 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.48 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.21/0.48 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --heuristic_context casc_unsat --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 64.67/9.73 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 64.67/9.73 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 64.67/9.73
% 64.67/9.73 %---------------- iProver v3.9 (pre CASC 2024/SMT-COMP 2024) ----------------%
% 64.67/9.73
% 64.67/9.73 ------ iProver source info
% 64.67/9.73
% 64.67/9.73 git: date: 2024-05-02 19:28:25 +0000
% 64.67/9.73 git: sha1: a33b5eb135c74074ba803943bb12f2ebd971352f
% 64.67/9.73 git: non_committed_changes: false
% 64.67/9.73
% 64.67/9.73 ------ Parsing...successful
% 64.67/9.73
% 64.67/9.73
% 64.67/9.73
% 64.67/9.73 ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 1 sf_s rm: 823 0s sf_e pe_s pe:1:0s pe:2:0s pe:4:0s pe:8:0s pe:16:0s pe_e sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 69 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e
% 64.67/9.73
% 64.67/9.73 ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e
% 64.67/9.73
% 64.67/9.73 ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 64.67/9.73 ------ Proving...
% 64.67/9.73 ------ Problem Properties
% 64.67/9.73
% 64.67/9.73
% 64.67/9.73 clauses 298
% 64.67/9.73 conjectures 3
% 64.67/9.73 EPR 26
% 64.67/9.73 Horn 270
% 64.67/9.73 unary 77
% 64.67/9.73 binary 173
% 64.67/9.73 lits 567
% 64.67/9.73 lits eq 162
% 64.67/9.73 fd_pure 0
% 64.67/9.73 fd_pseudo 0
% 64.67/9.73 fd_cond 21
% 64.67/9.73 fd_pseudo_cond 40
% 64.67/9.73 AC symbols 0
% 64.67/9.73
% 64.67/9.73 ------ Input Options Time Limit: Unbounded
% 64.67/9.73
% 64.67/9.73
% 64.67/9.73 ------
% 64.67/9.73 Current options:
% 64.67/9.73 ------
% 64.67/9.73
% 64.67/9.73
% 64.67/9.73
% 64.67/9.73
% 64.67/9.73 ------ Proving...
% 64.67/9.73
% 64.67/9.73
% 64.67/9.73 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 64.67/9.73
% 64.67/9.73 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 64.67/9.73
% 64.67/9.73
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------