TSTP Solution File: SET855-2 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : SET855-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:57:13 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 2.06s 1.54s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 2.52s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   17 (   8 unt;   6 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   16 (   6 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   12 (   7   ~;   5   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    6 (   3   >;   3   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    6 (;   6   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ c_lessequals > c_Union > #nlpp > tc_set > v_n > v_Y > t_a

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(tc_set,type,
    tc_set: $i > $i ).

tff(v_n,type,
    v_n: $i ).

tff(t_a,type,
    t_a: $i ).

tff(c_lessequals,type,
    c_lessequals: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(c_Union,type,
    c_Union: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(v_Y,type,
    v_Y: $i ).

tff(f_37,axiom,
    v_n != c_Union(v_Y,tc_set(t_a)),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_35,axiom,
    c_lessequals(c_Union(v_Y,tc_set(t_a)),v_n,tc_set(tc_set(t_a))),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_34,axiom,
    c_lessequals(v_n,c_Union(v_Y,tc_set(t_a)),tc_set(tc_set(t_a))),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_33,axiom,
    ! [V_B,V_A,T_a] :
      ( ~ c_lessequals(V_B,V_A,tc_set(T_a))
      | ~ c_lessequals(V_A,V_B,tc_set(T_a))
      | ( V_A = V_B ) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(c_8,plain,
    c_Union(v_Y,tc_set(t_a)) != v_n,
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_37]) ).

tff(c_6,plain,
    c_lessequals(c_Union(v_Y,tc_set(t_a)),v_n,tc_set(tc_set(t_a))),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_35]) ).

tff(c_4,plain,
    c_lessequals(v_n,c_Union(v_Y,tc_set(t_a)),tc_set(tc_set(t_a))),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_34]) ).

tff(c_9,plain,
    ! [V_B_4,V_A_5,T_a_6] :
      ( ( V_B_4 = V_A_5 )
      | ~ c_lessequals(V_A_5,V_B_4,tc_set(T_a_6))
      | ~ c_lessequals(V_B_4,V_A_5,tc_set(T_a_6)) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_33]) ).

tff(c_11,plain,
    ( ( c_Union(v_Y,tc_set(t_a)) = v_n )
    | ~ c_lessequals(c_Union(v_Y,tc_set(t_a)),v_n,tc_set(tc_set(t_a))) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_4,c_9]) ).

tff(c_16,plain,
    c_Union(v_Y,tc_set(t_a)) = v_n,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_6,c_11]) ).

tff(c_18,plain,
    $false,
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_8,c_16]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.13  % Problem  : SET855-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.12/0.14  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 16:27:53 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 2.06/1.54  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.06/1.55  
% 2.06/1.55  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.52/1.58  
% 2.52/1.58  Inference rules
% 2.52/1.58  ----------------------
% 2.52/1.58  #Ref     : 0
% 2.52/1.58  #Sup     : 2
% 2.52/1.58  #Fact    : 0
% 2.52/1.58  #Define  : 0
% 2.52/1.58  #Split   : 0
% 2.52/1.58  #Chain   : 0
% 2.52/1.58  #Close   : 0
% 2.52/1.58  
% 2.52/1.58  Ordering : KBO
% 2.52/1.58  
% 2.52/1.58  Simplification rules
% 2.52/1.58  ----------------------
% 2.52/1.58  #Subsume      : 0
% 2.52/1.58  #Demod        : 1
% 2.52/1.58  #Tautology    : 0
% 2.52/1.58  #SimpNegUnit  : 1
% 2.52/1.58  #BackRed      : 0
% 2.52/1.58  
% 2.52/1.58  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 2.52/1.58  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 2.52/1.58  
% 2.52/1.58  Timing (in seconds)
% 2.52/1.58  ----------------------
% 2.56/1.59  Preprocessing        : 0.39
% 2.56/1.59  Parsing              : 0.21
% 2.56/1.59  CNF conversion       : 0.02
% 2.56/1.59  Main loop            : 0.13
% 2.56/1.59  Inferencing          : 0.06
% 2.56/1.59  Reduction            : 0.03
% 2.56/1.59  Demodulation         : 0.02
% 2.56/1.59  BG Simplification    : 0.01
% 2.56/1.59  Subsumption          : 0.03
% 2.56/1.59  Abstraction          : 0.00
% 2.56/1.59  MUC search           : 0.00
% 2.56/1.59  Cooper               : 0.00
% 2.56/1.59  Total                : 0.58
% 2.56/1.59  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 2.56/1.59  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 2.56/1.59  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 2.56/1.59  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------