TSTP Solution File: SET849-2 by E---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1.00
% Problem : SET849-2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 02:56:17 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.50s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 13 ( 7 unt; 0 nHn; 10 RR)
% Number of literals : 19 ( 7 equ; 9 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 2 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 21 ( 2 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_Zorn_Oequal__succ__Union_1,axiom,
( c_Union(c_Zorn_OTFin(X1,X2),tc_set(X2)) = c_Zorn_Osucc(X1,c_Union(c_Zorn_OTFin(X1,X2),tc_set(X2)),X2)
| ~ c_in(c_Union(c_Zorn_OTFin(X1,X2),tc_set(X2)),c_Zorn_OTFin(X1,X2),tc_set(tc_set(X2))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Zorn_Oequal__succ__Union_1) ).
cnf(cls_Zorn_OTFin__UnionI_0,axiom,
( c_in(c_Union(X1,tc_set(X3)),c_Zorn_OTFin(X2,X3),tc_set(tc_set(X3)))
| ~ c_lessequals(X1,c_Zorn_OTFin(X2,X3),tc_set(tc_set(tc_set(X3)))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Zorn_OTFin__UnionI_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
c_Zorn_Osucc(v_S,c_Union(c_Zorn_OTFin(v_S,t_a),tc_set(t_a)),t_a) != c_Union(c_Zorn_OTFin(v_S,t_a),tc_set(t_a)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).
cnf(cls_Set_Osubset__refl_0,axiom,
c_lessequals(X1,X1,tc_set(X2)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_Osubset__refl_0) ).
cnf(c_0_4,plain,
( c_Union(c_Zorn_OTFin(X1,X2),tc_set(X2)) = c_Zorn_Osucc(X1,c_Union(c_Zorn_OTFin(X1,X2),tc_set(X2)),X2)
| ~ c_in(c_Union(c_Zorn_OTFin(X1,X2),tc_set(X2)),c_Zorn_OTFin(X1,X2),tc_set(tc_set(X2))) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Zorn_Oequal__succ__Union_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,plain,
( c_in(c_Union(X1,tc_set(X3)),c_Zorn_OTFin(X2,X3),tc_set(tc_set(X3)))
| ~ c_lessequals(X1,c_Zorn_OTFin(X2,X3),tc_set(tc_set(tc_set(X3)))) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Zorn_OTFin__UnionI_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
c_Zorn_Osucc(v_S,c_Union(c_Zorn_OTFin(v_S,t_a),tc_set(t_a)),t_a) != c_Union(c_Zorn_OTFin(v_S,t_a),tc_set(t_a)),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( c_Union(c_Zorn_OTFin(X1,X2),tc_set(X2)) = c_Zorn_Osucc(X1,c_Union(c_Zorn_OTFin(X1,X2),tc_set(X2)),X2)
| ~ c_in(c_Union(c_Zorn_OTFin(X1,X2),tc_set(X2)),c_Zorn_OTFin(X1,X2),tc_set(tc_set(X2))) ),
c_0_4 ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( c_in(c_Union(X1,tc_set(X3)),c_Zorn_OTFin(X2,X3),tc_set(tc_set(X3)))
| ~ c_lessequals(X1,c_Zorn_OTFin(X2,X3),tc_set(tc_set(tc_set(X3)))) ),
c_0_5 ).
cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
c_lessequals(X1,X1,tc_set(X2)),
cls_Set_Osubset__refl_0 ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
c_Zorn_Osucc(v_S,c_Union(c_Zorn_OTFin(v_S,t_a),tc_set(t_a)),t_a) != c_Union(c_Zorn_OTFin(v_S,t_a),tc_set(t_a)),
c_0_6 ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
c_Zorn_Osucc(X1,c_Union(c_Zorn_OTFin(X1,X2),tc_set(X2)),X2) = c_Union(c_Zorn_OTFin(X1,X2),tc_set(X2)),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),c_0_9])]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SET849-2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Mon May 20 12:26:07 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.48 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.20/0.48 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.50 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.20/0.50 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.50 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # new_bool_3 with pid 1446 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.20/0.50 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.50 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.20/0.50 # Search class: FHUSF-FFSF32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.50 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 1451 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.20/0.50 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.50 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.20/0.50 # Search class: FHUSF-FFSF32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.50 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.20/0.50 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.20/0.50
% 0.20/0.50 # Proof found!
% 0.20/0.50 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.20/0.50 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.50 # Parsed axioms : 4
% 0.20/0.50 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Initial clauses : 4
% 0.20/0.50 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Initial clauses in saturation : 4
% 0.20/0.50 # Processed clauses : 9
% 0.20/0.50 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # ...remaining for further processing : 9
% 0.20/0.50 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Backward-rewritten : 2
% 0.20/0.50 # Generated clauses : 1
% 0.20/0.50 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1
% 0.20/0.50 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Paramodulations : 1
% 0.20/0.50 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # NegExts : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Total rewrite steps : 3
% 0.20/0.50 # ...of those cached : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.50 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.50 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.50 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.50 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.50 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.50 # Current number of processed clauses : 3
% 0.20/0.50 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 2
% 0.20/0.50 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Non-unit-clauses : 1
% 0.20/0.50 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.20/0.50 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Current number of archived clauses : 6
% 0.20/0.50 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # BW rewrite match attempts : 2
% 0.20/0.50 # BW rewrite match successes : 2
% 0.20/0.50 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Termbank termtop insertions : 270
% 0.20/0.50 # Search garbage collected termcells : 8
% 0.20/0.50
% 0.20/0.50 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.50 # User time : 0.003 s
% 0.20/0.50 # System time : 0.001 s
% 0.20/0.50 # Total time : 0.004 s
% 0.20/0.50 # Maximum resident set size: 1608 pages
% 0.20/0.50
% 0.20/0.50 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.50 # User time : 0.005 s
% 0.20/0.50 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.20/0.50 # Total time : 0.007 s
% 0.20/0.50 # Maximum resident set size: 1692 pages
% 0.20/0.50 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.20/0.50 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------