TSTP Solution File: SET847-2 by SNARK---20120808r022

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : SET847-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 05:12:43 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.18s 0.51s
% Output   : Refutation 0.18s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :   11
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   19 (  12 unt;   2 nHn;  10 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   28 (   5 equ;  11 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   11 (  11 usr;   3 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   39 (   7 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_Set_ODiffI_0,axiom,
    ( ~ c_in(X,Y,Z)
    | c_in(X,U,Z)
    | c_in(X,c_minus(Y,U,tc_set(Z)),Z) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_ODiffI_0) ).

cnf(cls_Set_OemptyE_0,axiom,
    ~ c_in(X,c_emptyset,Y),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OemptyE_0) ).

cnf(cls_Set_Oempty__subsetI_0,axiom,
    c_lessequals(c_emptyset,X,tc_set(Y)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_Oempty__subsetI_0) ).

cnf(cls_Set_OsubsetI_0,axiom,
    ( c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(X,Y,Z),X,Z)
    | c_lessequals(X,Y,tc_set(Z)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OsubsetI_0) ).

cnf(cls_Set_Osubset__antisym_0,axiom,
    ( ~ c_lessequals(X,Y,tc_set(Z))
    | ~ c_lessequals(Y,X,tc_set(Z))
    | Y = X ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_Osubset__antisym_0) ).

cnf(cls_Set_Osubset__refl_0,axiom,
    c_lessequals(X,X,tc_set(Y)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_Osubset__refl_0) ).

cnf(cls_Zorn_OTFin__UnionI_0,axiom,
    ( ~ c_lessequals(X,c_Zorn_OTFin(Y,Z),tc_set(tc_set(tc_set(Z))))
    | c_in(c_Union(X,tc_set(Z)),c_Zorn_OTFin(Y,Z),tc_set(tc_set(Z))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Zorn_OTFin__UnionI_0) ).

cnf(cls_Zorn_OTFin__chain__lemma4_0,axiom,
    ( ~ c_in(X,c_Zorn_OTFin(Y,Z),tc_set(tc_set(Z)))
    | c_in(X,c_Zorn_Ochain(Y,Z),tc_set(tc_set(Z))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Zorn_OTFin__chain__lemma4_0) ).

cnf(cls_Zorn_Oequal__succ__Union_1,axiom,
    ( ~ c_in(c_Union(c_Zorn_OTFin(X,Y),tc_set(Y)),c_Zorn_OTFin(X,Y),tc_set(tc_set(Y)))
    | c_Union(c_Zorn_OTFin(X,Y),tc_set(Y)) = c_Zorn_Osucc(X,c_Union(c_Zorn_OTFin(X,Y),tc_set(Y)),Y) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Zorn_Oequal__succ__Union_1) ).

cnf(cls_Zorn_Osucc__not__equals_0,axiom,
    ( ~ c_in(X,c_minus(c_Zorn_Ochain(Y,Z),c_Zorn_Omaxchain(Y,Z),tc_set(tc_set(tc_set(Z)))),tc_set(tc_set(Z)))
    | c_Zorn_Osucc(Y,X,Z) != X ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Zorn_Osucc__not__equals_0) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_in(X,c_Zorn_Omaxchain(v_S,t_a),tc_set(tc_set(t_a))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).

cnf(12,plain,
    c_lessequals(c_Zorn_Omaxchain(v_S,t_a),X,tc_set(tc_set(tc_set(t_a)))),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_Set_OsubsetI_0,cls_conjecture_0]) ).

cnf(16,plain,
    c_in(c_Union(c_Zorn_OTFin(X,Y),tc_set(Y)),c_Zorn_OTFin(X,Y),tc_set(tc_set(Y))),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_Zorn_OTFin__UnionI_0,cls_Set_Osubset__refl_0]) ).

cnf(17,plain,
    c_Union(c_Zorn_OTFin(X,Y),tc_set(Y)) = c_Zorn_Osucc(X,c_Union(c_Zorn_OTFin(X,Y),tc_set(Y)),Y),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[cls_Zorn_Oequal__succ__Union_1,16]) ).

cnf(19,plain,
    ~ c_in(c_Union(c_Zorn_OTFin(X,Y),tc_set(Y)),c_minus(c_Zorn_Ochain(X,Y),c_Zorn_Omaxchain(X,Y),tc_set(tc_set(tc_set(Y)))),tc_set(tc_set(Y))),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_Zorn_Osucc__not__equals_0,17]) ).

cnf(20,plain,
    c_emptyset = c_Zorn_Omaxchain(v_S,t_a),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_Set_Osubset__antisym_0,12,cls_Set_Oempty__subsetI_0]) ).

cnf(29,plain,
    c_in(c_Union(c_Zorn_OTFin(X,Y),tc_set(Y)),c_Zorn_Ochain(X,Y),tc_set(tc_set(Y))),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_Zorn_OTFin__chain__lemma4_0,16]) ).

cnf(32,plain,
    c_in(c_Union(c_Zorn_OTFin(X,Y),tc_set(Y)),c_minus(c_Zorn_Ochain(X,Y),c_emptyset,tc_set(tc_set(tc_set(Y)))),tc_set(tc_set(Y))),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_Set_ODiffI_0,29,cls_Set_OemptyE_0]) ).

cnf(43,plain,
    $false,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[19,20,theory(equality)]),32]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : SET847-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.11/0.13  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Sat Jul  9 21:45:44 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.45  /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.46  * 
% 0.18/0.46  * 
% 0.18/0.47  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.18/0.47  * 
% 0.18/0.47  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.18/0.47  * 
% 0.18/0.47  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.18/0.47   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.18/0.47   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.18/0.47   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.18/0.47   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.18/0.47   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.18/0.47   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.18/0.47   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.18/0.47   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.18/0.47   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.18/0.47   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.18/0.47   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.18/0.47   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.18/0.47  * 
% 0.18/0.47  "."
% 0.18/0.47  * 
% 0.18/0.47  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-09T21:45:44
% 0.18/0.47  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n003.cluster.edu at 2022-07-09T21:45:44
% 0.18/0.51  
% 0.18/0.51  
% 0.18/0.51  #||
% 0.18/0.51  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.51  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.18/0.51  ||#
% 0.18/0.51  
% 0.18/0.51  ; Summary of computation:
% 0.18/0.51  ;        90 formulas have been input or derived (from 24 formulas).
% 0.18/0.51  ;        43 (48%) were retained.  Of these,
% 0.18/0.51  ;            3 ( 7%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 0.18/0.51  ;           40 (93%) are still being kept.
% 0.18/0.51  ; 
% 0.18/0.51  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 0.18/0.51  ;     0.003   7%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 0.18/0.51  ;     0.000   0%   Assert                       (11 calls)
% 0.18/0.51  ;     0.005  12%   Process new row              (66 calls)
% 0.18/0.51  ;     0.006  15%   Resolution                   (46 calls)
% 0.18/0.51  ;     0.000   0%   Paramodulation               (23 calls)
% 0.18/0.51  ;     0.000   0%   Factoring                    (3 calls)
% 0.18/0.51  ;     0.000   0%   Condensing                   (27 calls)
% 0.18/0.51  ;     0.002   5%   Forward subsumption          (27 calls)
% 0.18/0.51  ;     0.000   0%   Backward subsumption         (22 calls)
% 0.18/0.51  ;     0.001   2%   Clause clause subsumption    (11 calls)
% 0.18/0.51  ;     0.003   7%   Forward simplification       (63 calls)
% 0.18/0.51  ;     0.000   0%   Backward simplification      (43 calls)
% 0.18/0.51  ;     0.000   0%   Ordering                     (44 calls)
% 0.18/0.51  ;     0.000   0%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 0.18/0.51  ;     0.000   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 0.18/0.51  ;     0.021  51%   Other
% 0.18/0.51  ;     0.041        Total
% 0.18/0.51  ;     0.044        Real time
% 0.18/0.51  ; 
% 0.18/0.51  ; Term-hash-array has 113 terms in all.
% 0.18/0.51  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 21 entries (21 at peak, 22 added, 1 deleted).
% 0.18/0.51  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 172 nodes (172 at peak, 190 added, 18 deleted).
% 0.18/0.51  ;  Retrieved 13 possibly forward subsuming rows in 27 calls.
% 0.18/0.51  ;  Retrieved 0 possibly backward subsumed rows in 22 calls.
% 0.18/0.51  ; Path-index has 114 entries (114 at peak, 121 added, 7 deleted).
% 0.18/0.51  ; Path-index has 304 nodes (304 at peak, 322 added, 18 deleted).
% 0.18/0.51  ; Trie-index has 114 entries (114 at peak, 121 added, 7 deleted).
% 0.18/0.51  ; Trie-index has 532 nodes (532 at peak, 571 added, 39 deleted).
% 0.18/0.51  ; Retrieved 7 generalization terms in 72 calls.
% 0.18/0.51  ; Retrieved 23 instance terms in 20 calls.
% 0.18/0.51  ; Retrieved 392 unifiable terms in 233 calls.
% 0.18/0.51  ; 
% 0.18/0.51  ; The agenda of rows to process has 3 entries:
% 0.18/0.51  ;     1 with value 37              1 with value 38               1 with value 44
% 0.18/0.51  ; The agenda of rows to give has 18 entries:
% 0.18/0.51  ;     1 with value (4 19)          1 with value (4 33)           1 with value (4 40)
% 0.18/0.51  ;     1 with value (4 27)          1 with value (4 34)           1 with value (4 41)
% 0.18/0.51  ;     1 with value (4 28)          1 with value (4 36)           1 with value (4 44)
% 0.18/0.51  ;     1 with value (4 29)          1 with value (4 37)           2 with value (4 45)
% 0.18/0.51  ;     1 with value (4 30)          1 with value (4 38)           1 with value (4 48)
% 0.18/0.51  ;     2 with value (4 32)
% 0.18/0.51  Evaluation took:
% 0.18/0.51    0.045 seconds of real time
% 0.18/0.51    0.035557 seconds of user run time
% 0.18/0.51    0.008868 seconds of system run time
% 0.18/0.51    0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.18/0.51    0 page faults and
% 0.18/0.51    3,623,416 bytes consed.
% 0.18/0.51  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.18/0.51  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-09T21:45:44
% 0.18/0.51  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.18/0.51  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------