TSTP Solution File: SET847-2 by E---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1
% Problem  : SET847-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:21:05 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.17s 0.44s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.17s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :   11
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   31 (  12 unt;   4 nHn;  21 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   54 (  13 equ;  29 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   11 (  11 usr;   3 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   64 (  13 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_in(X1,c_Zorn_Omaxchain(v_S,t_a),tc_set(tc_set(t_a))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.ZBBmInbfcb/E---3.1_22917.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).

cnf(cls_Set_OsubsetI_0,axiom,
    ( c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(X1,X2,X3),X1,X3)
    | c_lessequals(X1,X2,tc_set(X3)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.ZBBmInbfcb/E---3.1_22917.p',cls_Set_OsubsetI_0) ).

cnf(cls_Set_Osubset__antisym_0,axiom,
    ( X2 = X1
    | ~ c_lessequals(X1,X2,tc_set(X3))
    | ~ c_lessequals(X2,X1,tc_set(X3)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.ZBBmInbfcb/E---3.1_22917.p',cls_Set_Osubset__antisym_0) ).

cnf(cls_Set_Oempty__subsetI_0,axiom,
    c_lessequals(c_emptyset,X1,tc_set(X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.ZBBmInbfcb/E---3.1_22917.p',cls_Set_Oempty__subsetI_0) ).

cnf(cls_Zorn_Osucc__not__equals_0,axiom,
    ( ~ c_in(X1,c_minus(c_Zorn_Ochain(X2,X3),c_Zorn_Omaxchain(X2,X3),tc_set(tc_set(tc_set(X3)))),tc_set(tc_set(X3)))
    | c_Zorn_Osucc(X2,X1,X3) != X1 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.ZBBmInbfcb/E---3.1_22917.p',cls_Zorn_Osucc__not__equals_0) ).

cnf(cls_Set_ODiffI_0,axiom,
    ( c_in(X1,X4,X3)
    | c_in(X1,c_minus(X2,X4,tc_set(X3)),X3)
    | ~ c_in(X1,X2,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.ZBBmInbfcb/E---3.1_22917.p',cls_Set_ODiffI_0) ).

cnf(cls_Set_OemptyE_0,axiom,
    ~ c_in(X1,c_emptyset,X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.ZBBmInbfcb/E---3.1_22917.p',cls_Set_OemptyE_0) ).

cnf(cls_Zorn_OTFin__chain__lemma4_0,axiom,
    ( c_in(X1,c_Zorn_Ochain(X2,X3),tc_set(tc_set(X3)))
    | ~ c_in(X1,c_Zorn_OTFin(X2,X3),tc_set(tc_set(X3))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.ZBBmInbfcb/E---3.1_22917.p',cls_Zorn_OTFin__chain__lemma4_0) ).

cnf(cls_Zorn_OTFin__UnionI_0,axiom,
    ( c_in(c_Union(X1,tc_set(X3)),c_Zorn_OTFin(X2,X3),tc_set(tc_set(X3)))
    | ~ c_lessequals(X1,c_Zorn_OTFin(X2,X3),tc_set(tc_set(tc_set(X3)))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.ZBBmInbfcb/E---3.1_22917.p',cls_Zorn_OTFin__UnionI_0) ).

cnf(cls_Zorn_Oequal__succ__Union_1,axiom,
    ( c_Union(c_Zorn_OTFin(X1,X2),tc_set(X2)) = c_Zorn_Osucc(X1,c_Union(c_Zorn_OTFin(X1,X2),tc_set(X2)),X2)
    | ~ c_in(c_Union(c_Zorn_OTFin(X1,X2),tc_set(X2)),c_Zorn_OTFin(X1,X2),tc_set(tc_set(X2))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.ZBBmInbfcb/E---3.1_22917.p',cls_Zorn_Oequal__succ__Union_1) ).

cnf(cls_Set_Osubset__refl_0,axiom,
    c_lessequals(X1,X1,tc_set(X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.ZBBmInbfcb/E---3.1_22917.p',cls_Set_Osubset__refl_0) ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_in(X1,c_Zorn_Omaxchain(v_S,t_a),tc_set(tc_set(t_a))),
    cls_conjecture_0 ).

cnf(c_0_12,axiom,
    ( c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(X1,X2,X3),X1,X3)
    | c_lessequals(X1,X2,tc_set(X3)) ),
    cls_Set_OsubsetI_0 ).

cnf(c_0_13,axiom,
    ( X2 = X1
    | ~ c_lessequals(X1,X2,tc_set(X3))
    | ~ c_lessequals(X2,X1,tc_set(X3)) ),
    cls_Set_Osubset__antisym_0 ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    c_lessequals(c_Zorn_Omaxchain(v_S,t_a),X1,tc_set(tc_set(tc_set(t_a)))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    ( X1 = c_Zorn_Omaxchain(v_S,t_a)
    | ~ c_lessequals(X1,c_Zorn_Omaxchain(v_S,t_a),tc_set(tc_set(tc_set(t_a)))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,axiom,
    c_lessequals(c_emptyset,X1,tc_set(X2)),
    cls_Set_Oempty__subsetI_0 ).

cnf(c_0_17,axiom,
    ( ~ c_in(X1,c_minus(c_Zorn_Ochain(X2,X3),c_Zorn_Omaxchain(X2,X3),tc_set(tc_set(tc_set(X3)))),tc_set(tc_set(X3)))
    | c_Zorn_Osucc(X2,X1,X3) != X1 ),
    cls_Zorn_Osucc__not__equals_0 ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    c_Zorn_Omaxchain(v_S,t_a) = c_emptyset,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    ( c_Zorn_Osucc(v_S,X1,t_a) != X1
    | ~ c_in(X1,c_minus(c_Zorn_Ochain(v_S,t_a),c_emptyset,tc_set(tc_set(tc_set(t_a)))),tc_set(tc_set(t_a))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,axiom,
    ( c_in(X1,X4,X3)
    | c_in(X1,c_minus(X2,X4,tc_set(X3)),X3)
    | ~ c_in(X1,X2,X3) ),
    cls_Set_ODiffI_0 ).

cnf(c_0_21,axiom,
    ~ c_in(X1,c_emptyset,X2),
    cls_Set_OemptyE_0 ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    ( c_Zorn_Osucc(v_S,X1,t_a) != X1
    | ~ c_in(X1,c_Zorn_Ochain(v_S,t_a),tc_set(tc_set(t_a))) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]),c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,axiom,
    ( c_in(X1,c_Zorn_Ochain(X2,X3),tc_set(tc_set(X3)))
    | ~ c_in(X1,c_Zorn_OTFin(X2,X3),tc_set(tc_set(X3))) ),
    cls_Zorn_OTFin__chain__lemma4_0 ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    ( c_Zorn_Osucc(v_S,X1,t_a) != X1
    | ~ c_in(X1,c_Zorn_OTFin(v_S,t_a),tc_set(tc_set(t_a))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,axiom,
    ( c_in(c_Union(X1,tc_set(X3)),c_Zorn_OTFin(X2,X3),tc_set(tc_set(X3)))
    | ~ c_lessequals(X1,c_Zorn_OTFin(X2,X3),tc_set(tc_set(tc_set(X3)))) ),
    cls_Zorn_OTFin__UnionI_0 ).

cnf(c_0_26,axiom,
    ( c_Union(c_Zorn_OTFin(X1,X2),tc_set(X2)) = c_Zorn_Osucc(X1,c_Union(c_Zorn_OTFin(X1,X2),tc_set(X2)),X2)
    | ~ c_in(c_Union(c_Zorn_OTFin(X1,X2),tc_set(X2)),c_Zorn_OTFin(X1,X2),tc_set(tc_set(X2))) ),
    cls_Zorn_Oequal__succ__Union_1 ).

cnf(c_0_27,axiom,
    c_lessequals(X1,X1,tc_set(X2)),
    cls_Set_Osubset__refl_0 ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    ( c_Zorn_Osucc(v_S,c_Union(X1,tc_set(t_a)),t_a) != c_Union(X1,tc_set(t_a))
    | ~ c_lessequals(X1,c_Zorn_OTFin(v_S,t_a),tc_set(tc_set(tc_set(t_a)))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    c_Zorn_Osucc(X1,c_Union(c_Zorn_OTFin(X1,X2),tc_set(X2)),X2) = c_Union(c_Zorn_OTFin(X1,X2),tc_set(X2)),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_25]),c_0_27])]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]),c_0_27])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.05/0.11  % Problem    : SET847-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.05/0.12  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.12/0.32  % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.32  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.12/0.32  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.32  % DateTime   : Mon Oct  2 16:51:01 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.32  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.17/0.43  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.17/0.43  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.ZBBmInbfcb/E---3.1_22917.p
% 0.17/0.44  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.17/0.44  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.44  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.44  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.17/0.44  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.44  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.44  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.44  # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 23000 completed with status 0
% 0.17/0.44  # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.17/0.44  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.44  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.44  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.17/0.44  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.17/0.44  # Search class: FGHSS-FFSF32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.17/0.44  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.17/0.44  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 811s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.44  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.44  # Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.44  # Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.44  # Starting sh5l with 136s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.44  # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 23004 completed with status 0
% 0.17/0.44  # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.17/0.44  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.44  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.44  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.17/0.44  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.17/0.44  # Search class: FGHSS-FFSF32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.17/0.44  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.17/0.44  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 811s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.44  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.17/0.44  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.17/0.44  
% 0.17/0.44  # Proof found!
% 0.17/0.44  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.17/0.44  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.17/0.44  # Parsed axioms                        : 11
% 0.17/0.44  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.17/0.44  # Initial clauses                      : 11
% 0.17/0.44  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.17/0.44  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 11
% 0.17/0.44  # Processed clauses                    : 38
% 0.17/0.44  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.17/0.44  # ...subsumed                          : 2
% 0.17/0.44  # ...remaining for further processing  : 36
% 0.17/0.44  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.17/0.44  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.17/0.44  # Backward-subsumed                    : 1
% 0.17/0.44  # Backward-rewritten                   : 4
% 0.17/0.44  # Generated clauses                    : 17
% 0.17/0.44  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 17
% 0.17/0.44  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.17/0.44  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.17/0.44  # Paramodulations                      : 17
% 0.17/0.44  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.17/0.44  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.17/0.44  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.17/0.44  # Total rewrite steps                  : 9
% 0.17/0.44  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.17/0.44  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.17/0.44  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.17/0.44  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.17/0.44  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.17/0.44  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.17/0.44  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.17/0.44  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.17/0.44  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.17/0.44  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.17/0.44  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.17/0.44  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.17/0.44  # Current number of processed clauses  : 20
% 0.17/0.44  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 4
% 0.17/0.44  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.17/0.44  #    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.17/0.44  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 15
% 0.17/0.44  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1
% 0.17/0.44  # ...number of literals in the above   : 2
% 0.17/0.44  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.17/0.44  # Current number of archived clauses   : 16
% 0.17/0.44  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 9
% 0.17/0.44  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 9
% 0.17/0.44  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 2
% 0.17/0.44  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.17/0.44  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.17/0.44  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 4
% 0.17/0.44  # BW rewrite match successes           : 2
% 0.17/0.44  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.17/0.44  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.17/0.44  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 1051
% 0.17/0.44  
% 0.17/0.44  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/0.44  # User time                : 0.004 s
% 0.17/0.44  # System time              : 0.001 s
% 0.17/0.44  # Total time               : 0.005 s
% 0.17/0.44  # Maximum resident set size: 1636 pages
% 0.17/0.44  
% 0.17/0.44  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/0.44  # User time                : 0.015 s
% 0.17/0.44  # System time              : 0.008 s
% 0.17/0.44  # Total time               : 0.023 s
% 0.17/0.44  # Maximum resident set size: 1684 pages
% 0.17/0.44  % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.17/0.44  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------