TSTP Solution File: SET845-2 by Vampire-SAT---4.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire-SAT---4.8
% Problem  : SET845-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s

% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Apr 30 15:13:32 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.38s
% Output   : Refutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   12 (   9 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   16 (   3 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   10 (   6   ~;   4   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   3 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   12 (  12   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f25,plain,
    $false,
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f24,f13]) ).

fof(f13,plain,
    ~ c_lessequals(c_Zorn_Osucc(v_S,v_m,t_a),v_m,tc_set(tc_set(t_a))),
    inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f7,f3,f2]) ).

fof(f2,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ c_lessequals(X1,X0,tc_set(X2))
      | X0 = X1
      | ~ c_lessequals(X0,X1,tc_set(X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_Osubset__antisym_0) ).

fof(f3,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3,X4] : c_lessequals(X3,c_Zorn_Osucc(X4,X3,X2),tc_set(tc_set(X2))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Zorn_OAbrial__axiom1_0) ).

fof(f7,axiom,
    v_m != c_Zorn_Osucc(v_S,v_m,t_a),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).

fof(f24,plain,
    c_lessequals(c_Zorn_Osucc(v_S,v_m,t_a),v_m,tc_set(tc_set(t_a))),
    inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f21,f6]) ).

fof(f6,axiom,
    v_m = c_Union(c_Zorn_OTFin(v_S,t_a),tc_set(t_a)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).

fof(f21,plain,
    c_lessequals(c_Zorn_Osucc(v_S,v_m,t_a),c_Union(c_Zorn_OTFin(v_S,t_a),tc_set(t_a)),tc_set(tc_set(t_a))),
    inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f18,f1]) ).

fof(f1,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ c_in(X0,X1,tc_set(X2))
      | c_lessequals(X0,c_Union(X1,X2),tc_set(X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OUnion__upper_0) ).

fof(f18,plain,
    c_in(c_Zorn_Osucc(v_S,v_m,t_a),c_Zorn_OTFin(v_S,t_a),tc_set(tc_set(t_a))),
    inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f5,f4]) ).

fof(f4,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3,X4] :
      ( ~ c_in(X3,c_Zorn_OTFin(X4,X2),tc_set(tc_set(X2)))
      | c_in(c_Zorn_Osucc(X4,X3,X2),c_Zorn_OTFin(X4,X2),tc_set(tc_set(X2))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Zorn_OTFin_OsuccI_0) ).

fof(f5,axiom,
    c_in(v_m,c_Zorn_OTFin(v_S,t_a),tc_set(tc_set(t_a))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.13  % Problem    : SET845-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.12/0.15  % Command    : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.36  % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % DateTime   : Tue Apr 30 02:10:17 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.36  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.20/0.36  % (13271)Running in auto input_syntax mode. Trying TPTP
% 0.20/0.38  % (13274)WARNING: value z3 for option sas not known
% 0.20/0.38  % (13273)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbdsb=on:fmbes=contour:fmbswr=3:fde=none:nm=0_793 on theBenchmark for (793ds/0Mi)
% 0.20/0.38  % (13275)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbsr=1.5:nm=32_533 on theBenchmark for (533ds/0Mi)
% 0.20/0.38  % (13278)ott+1_64_av=off:bd=off:bce=on:fsd=off:fde=unused:gsp=on:irw=on:lcm=predicate:lma=on:nm=2:nwc=1.1:sims=off:urr=on_497 on theBenchmark for (497ds/0Mi)
% 0.20/0.38  % (13277)ott-10_8_av=off:bd=preordered:bs=on:fsd=off:fsr=off:fde=unused:irw=on:lcm=predicate:lma=on:nm=4:nwc=1.7:sp=frequency_522 on theBenchmark for (522ds/0Mi)
% 0.20/0.38  % (13274)dis+2_11_add=large:afr=on:amm=off:bd=off:bce=on:fsd=off:fde=none:gs=on:gsaa=full_model:gsem=off:irw=on:msp=off:nm=4:nwc=1.3:sas=z3:sims=off:sac=on:sp=reverse_arity_569 on theBenchmark for (569ds/0Mi)
% 0.20/0.38  % (13276)ott+10_10:1_add=off:afr=on:amm=off:anc=all:bd=off:bs=on:fsr=off:irw=on:lma=on:msp=off:nm=4:nwc=4.0:sac=on:sp=reverse_frequency_531 on theBenchmark for (531ds/0Mi)
% 0.20/0.38  TRYING [1]
% 0.20/0.38  % (13278)First to succeed.
% 0.20/0.38  TRYING [2]
% 0.20/0.38  % (13277)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.20/0.38  % (13272)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbas=function:fmbsr=1.2:fde=unused:nm=0_846 on theBenchmark for (846ds/0Mi)
% 0.20/0.38  % (13274)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.20/0.38  % (13278)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.20/0.38  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.38  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.38  % (13278)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.38  % (13278)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 8e9376e55 on 2024-01-18 13:49:33 +0100)
% 0.20/0.38  % (13278)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.20/0.38  
% 0.20/0.38  % (13278)Memory used [KB]: 753
% 0.20/0.38  % (13278)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.20/0.38  % (13278)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.20/0.38  % (13278)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.38  % (13278)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.38  % (13271)Success in time 0.018 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------