TSTP Solution File: SET842-2 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : SET842-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 05:21:10 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.56s
% Output : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SET842-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Sun Jul 10 05:30:53 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.36 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.12/0.36 The process was started by sandbox2 on n015.cluster.edu,
% 0.12/0.36 Sun Jul 10 05:30:53 2022
% 0.12/0.36 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 32090.
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.12/0.36 set(auto).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.12/0.36 clear(print_given).
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 list(usable).
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=3.
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 This is a non-Horn set without equality. The strategy
% 0.12/0.36 will be ordered hyper_res, ur_res, unit deletion, and
% 0.12/0.36 factoring, with satellites in sos and nuclei in usable.
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 ------------> process usable:
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 ------------> process sos:
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.19/0.56
% 0.19/0.56 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.56
% 0.19/0.56 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.19/0.56
% 0.19/0.56
% 0.19/0.56 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.19/0.56
% 0.19/0.56 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.19/0.56 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.19/0.56 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.19/0.56 number of clauses in intial UL: 6
% 0.19/0.56 number of clauses initially in problem: 7
% 0.19/0.56 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 85
% 0.19/0.56 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 0.19/0.56 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.19/0.56 absolute distinct symbol count: 9
% 0.19/0.56 distinct predicate count: 2
% 0.19/0.56 distinct function count: 4
% 0.19/0.56 distinct constant count: 3
% 0.19/0.56
% 0.19/0.56 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.19/0.56
% 0.19/0.56
% 0.19/0.56
% 0.19/0.56 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.19/0.56
% 0.19/0.56 =========== start of search ===========
% 0.19/0.56
% 0.19/0.56 -------- PROOF --------
% 0.19/0.56 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.19/0.56 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.19/0.56
% 0.19/0.56 ----> UNIT CONFLICT at 0.19 sec ----> 35 [binary,34.1,1.1] {-} $F.
% 0.19/0.56
% 0.19/0.56 Length of proof is 6. Level of proof is 5.
% 0.19/0.56
% 0.19/0.56 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 0.19/0.56 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.19/0.56 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.19/0.56
% 0.19/0.56 1 [] {+} -c_lessequals(c_Union(v_Y,tc_set(t_a)),v_m,tc_set(tc_set(t_a))).
% 0.19/0.56 2 [] {+} c_lessequals(A,v_m,tc_set(tc_set(t_a)))| -c_in(A,v_Y,tc_set(tc_set(t_a))).
% 0.19/0.56 3 [] {+} -c_in(A,c_Union(B,C),C)|c_in(c_Main_OUnionE__1(A,B,C),B,tc_set(C)).
% 0.19/0.56 4 [] {+} -c_in(A,c_Union(B,C),C)|c_in(A,c_Main_OUnionE__1(A,B,C),C).
% 0.19/0.56 5 [] {+} -c_in(A,B,C)| -c_lessequals(B,D,tc_set(C))|c_in(A,D,C).
% 0.19/0.56 6 [] {+} -c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(A,B,C),B,C)|c_lessequals(A,B,tc_set(C)).
% 0.19/0.56 7 [] {-} c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(A,B,C),A,C)|c_lessequals(A,B,tc_set(C)).
% 0.19/0.56 8 [hyper,7,1] {-} c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(c_Union(v_Y,tc_set(t_a)),v_m,tc_set(t_a)),c_Union(v_Y,tc_set(t_a)),tc_set(t_a)).
% 0.19/0.56 10 [hyper,8,4] {-} c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(c_Union(v_Y,tc_set(t_a)),v_m,tc_set(t_a)),c_Main_OUnionE__1(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(c_Union(v_Y,tc_set(t_a)),v_m,tc_set(t_a)),v_Y,tc_set(t_a)),tc_set(t_a)).
% 0.19/0.56 11 [hyper,8,3] {+} c_in(c_Main_OUnionE__1(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(c_Union(v_Y,tc_set(t_a)),v_m,tc_set(t_a)),v_Y,tc_set(t_a)),v_Y,tc_set(tc_set(t_a))).
% 0.19/0.56 20 [hyper,11,2] {+} c_lessequals(c_Main_OUnionE__1(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(c_Union(v_Y,tc_set(t_a)),v_m,tc_set(t_a)),v_Y,tc_set(t_a)),v_m,tc_set(tc_set(t_a))).
% 0.19/0.56 33 [hyper,20,5,10] {-} c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(c_Union(v_Y,tc_set(t_a)),v_m,tc_set(t_a)),v_m,tc_set(t_a)).
% 0.19/0.56 34 [hyper,33,6] {-} c_lessequals(c_Union(v_Y,tc_set(t_a)),v_m,tc_set(tc_set(t_a))).
% 0.19/0.56 35 [binary,34.1,1.1] {-} $F.
% 0.19/0.56
% 0.19/0.56 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.19/0.56 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 0.19/0.56
% 0.19/0.56
% 0.19/0.56 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.19/0.56
% 0.19/0.56
% 0.19/0.56 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.19/0.56
% 0.19/0.56 ============ end of search ============
% 0.19/0.56
% 0.19/0.56 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 0.19/0.56
% 0.19/0.56 true clauses given 2 (20.0%)
% 0.19/0.56 false clauses given 8
% 0.19/0.56
% 0.19/0.56 FALSE TRUE
% 0.19/0.56 29 1 0
% 0.19/0.56 31 1 0
% 0.19/0.56 32 1 0
% 0.19/0.56 35 1 1
% 0.19/0.56 36 1 0
% 0.19/0.56 38 1 0
% 0.19/0.56 39 3 0
% 0.19/0.56 41 1 0
% 0.19/0.56 48 1 0
% 0.19/0.56 51 0 1
% 0.19/0.56 52 1 0
% 0.19/0.56 57 0 1
% 0.19/0.56 tot: 12 3 (20.0% true)
% 0.19/0.56
% 0.19/0.56
% 0.19/0.56 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.56
% 0.19/0.56 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 0.19/0.56
% 0.19/0.56 Process 32090 finished Sun Jul 10 05:30:53 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------