TSTP Solution File: SET842-2 by SATCoP---0.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SATCoP---0.1
% Problem : SET842-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : satcop --statistics %s
% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 05:04:18 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.12s 0.34s
% Output : Proof 0.12s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (MakeTreeStats fails)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(g0,plain,
~ c_lessequals(c_Union(v_Y,tc_set(t_a)),v_m,tc_set(tc_set(t_a))),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_3)]) ).
cnf(g1,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(c_Union(v_Y,tc_set(t_a)),v_m,tc_set(t_a)),v_m,tc_set(t_a))
| c_lessequals(c_Union(v_Y,tc_set(t_a)),v_m,tc_set(tc_set(t_a))) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OsubsetI_1)]) ).
cnf(g2,plain,
( c_lessequals(c_Union(v_Y,tc_set(t_a)),v_m,tc_set(tc_set(t_a)))
| c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(c_Union(v_Y,tc_set(t_a)),v_m,tc_set(t_a)),c_Union(v_Y,tc_set(t_a)),tc_set(t_a)) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OsubsetI_0)]) ).
cnf(g3,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(c_Union(v_Y,tc_set(t_a)),v_m,tc_set(t_a)),c_Union(v_Y,tc_set(t_a)),tc_set(t_a))
| c_in(c_Main_OUnionE__1(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(c_Union(v_Y,tc_set(t_a)),v_m,tc_set(t_a)),v_Y,tc_set(t_a)),v_Y,tc_set(tc_set(t_a))) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OUnionE_0)]) ).
cnf(g4,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(c_Union(v_Y,tc_set(t_a)),v_m,tc_set(t_a)),c_Union(v_Y,tc_set(t_a)),tc_set(t_a))
| c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(c_Union(v_Y,tc_set(t_a)),v_m,tc_set(t_a)),c_Main_OUnionE__1(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(c_Union(v_Y,tc_set(t_a)),v_m,tc_set(t_a)),v_Y,tc_set(t_a)),tc_set(t_a)) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OUnionE_1)]) ).
cnf(g5,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_Main_OUnionE__1(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(c_Union(v_Y,tc_set(t_a)),v_m,tc_set(t_a)),v_Y,tc_set(t_a)),v_Y,tc_set(tc_set(t_a)))
| c_lessequals(c_Main_OUnionE__1(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(c_Union(v_Y,tc_set(t_a)),v_m,tc_set(t_a)),v_Y,tc_set(t_a)),v_m,tc_set(tc_set(t_a))) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_4)]) ).
cnf(g6,plain,
( ~ c_lessequals(c_Main_OUnionE__1(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(c_Union(v_Y,tc_set(t_a)),v_m,tc_set(t_a)),v_Y,tc_set(t_a)),v_m,tc_set(tc_set(t_a)))
| ~ c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(c_Union(v_Y,tc_set(t_a)),v_m,tc_set(t_a)),c_Main_OUnionE__1(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(c_Union(v_Y,tc_set(t_a)),v_m,tc_set(t_a)),v_Y,tc_set(t_a)),tc_set(t_a))
| c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(c_Union(v_Y,tc_set(t_a)),v_m,tc_set(t_a)),v_m,tc_set(t_a)) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OsubsetD_0)]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SET842-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.07/0.12 % Command : satcop --statistics %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sun Jul 10 05:41:26 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.34 % symbols: 11
% 0.12/0.34 % clauses: 7
% 0.12/0.34 % start clauses: 2
% 0.12/0.34 % iterative deepening steps: 77
% 0.12/0.34 % maximum path limit: 3
% 0.12/0.34 % literal attempts: 1603
% 0.12/0.34 % depth failures: 824
% 0.12/0.34 % regularity failures: 16
% 0.12/0.34 % tautology failures: 27
% 0.12/0.34 % reductions: 0
% 0.12/0.34 % extensions: 1462
% 0.12/0.34 % SAT variables: 917
% 0.12/0.34 % SAT clauses: 811
% 0.12/0.34 % WalkSAT solutions: 803
% 0.12/0.34 % CDCL solutions: 0
% 0.12/0.34 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.12/0.34 % SZS output start ListOfCNF for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------