TSTP Solution File: SET842-2 by DCTP---1.31
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : DCTP---1.31
% Problem : SET842-2 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : oldtptp
% Command : dctp-wrapper -negpref -complexity -fullrewrite -alternate -resisol %s
% Computer : art06.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat Dec 4 22:55:19 EST 2010
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.00s
% Output : Assurance 0.00s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% running dctp on problem file SET842-2.oldtptp on host art06.cs.miami.edu
% starting preprocessing loop for 7 clauses
% starting preprocessing loop for 7 clauses
% no conjecture type clause ... restricting relevance to all-negative clauses
% problem statistics for file /tmp/SystemOnTPTP5398/SET842-2.oldtptp
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 7 ( 1 non-Horn; 1 unit)
% Number of literals : 15 ( 0 equality)
% Maximal clause size : 3
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 propositional; 3-3 arity)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 3 constant; 0-3 arity)
% Number of variables : 18 ( 0 singleton)
% Maximal term depth : 3
% Starting proof
% **************** Exit status is success (PROOF found in 0.0 seconds) ****************
% Proof search statistics:
% ========================
% Length initial path: 7
% Linking steps (succ/fail): 22 / 12
% Twin-clause inferences: 8
% Eager eliminations: 0
% Rewrites (subgoal/path): 0 / 0
% GR-closures total/c-foldup: 17 / 0
% Links generated/deleted: 71 / 59
% Links sweeped vector/all: 0(0) / 0(0)
% Clauses in tableau/pruned: 30 / 29
% Regularity/Tautology fails: 0 / 4 (0)
% Renamings/Contractions: 0 / 0
% Variants deleted/subsumed: 19 / 0
% Clauses by splitting: 0
% Variant subsumption tests: 0
% Fails ful/mat/sig/len: 0 / 0 / 0 / 0
% Pre subsumption tests: 72
% Subsumed unit/path/back: 8 / 0 / 0
% Coupled eliminations: 2
% Simplifications/lemmas: 8 / 4 (0)
% Foldups root/context: 0 / 0
% Maximum term depth/compl: 10 / 76
% Relevance vectors: 48
% Unifications/failed: 0 / 0
% Maximum tableau depth: 28
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------