TSTP Solution File: SET842-2 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : SET842-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:57:09 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 3.10s 1.91s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.37s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :   16
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   29 (   4 unt;   9 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   40 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   39 (  19   ~;  20   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   15 (   6   >;   9   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   3 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   40 (;  40   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ c_lessequals > c_in > c_Main_OsubsetI__1 > c_Main_OUnionE__1 > c_Union > #nlpp > tc_set > v_m > v_Y > t_a

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(tc_set,type,
    tc_set: $i > $i ).

tff(t_a,type,
    t_a: $i ).

tff(c_Main_OsubsetI__1,type,
    c_Main_OsubsetI__1: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(c_lessequals,type,
    c_lessequals: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(c_in,type,
    c_in: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(c_Union,type,
    c_Union: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(v_m,type,
    v_m: $i ).

tff(v_Y,type,
    v_Y: $i ).

tff(c_Main_OUnionE__1,type,
    c_Main_OUnionE__1: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(f_27,axiom,
    ~ c_lessequals(c_Union(v_Y,tc_set(t_a)),v_m,tc_set(tc_set(t_a))),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_54,axiom,
    ! [V_A,V_B,T_a] :
      ( c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(V_A,V_B,T_a),V_A,T_a)
      | c_lessequals(V_A,V_B,tc_set(T_a)) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_37,axiom,
    ! [V_A,V_C,T_a] :
      ( ~ c_in(V_A,c_Union(V_C,T_a),T_a)
      | c_in(c_Main_OUnionE__1(V_A,V_C,T_a),V_C,tc_set(T_a)) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_42,axiom,
    ! [V_A,V_C,T_a] :
      ( ~ c_in(V_A,c_Union(V_C,T_a),T_a)
      | c_in(V_A,c_Main_OUnionE__1(V_A,V_C,T_a),T_a) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_32,axiom,
    ! [V_U] :
      ( c_lessequals(V_U,v_m,tc_set(tc_set(t_a)))
      | ~ c_in(V_U,v_Y,tc_set(tc_set(t_a))) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_50,axiom,
    ! [V_c,V_A,T_a,V_B] :
      ( ~ c_in(V_c,V_A,T_a)
      | ~ c_lessequals(V_A,V_B,tc_set(T_a))
      | c_in(V_c,V_B,T_a) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_59,axiom,
    ! [V_A,V_B,T_a] :
      ( ~ c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(V_A,V_B,T_a),V_B,T_a)
      | c_lessequals(V_A,V_B,tc_set(T_a)) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(c_2,plain,
    ~ c_lessequals(c_Union(v_Y,tc_set(t_a)),v_m,tc_set(tc_set(t_a))),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_27]) ).

tff(c_12,plain,
    ! [V_A_12,V_B_13,T_a_14] :
      ( c_lessequals(V_A_12,V_B_13,tc_set(T_a_14))
      | c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(V_A_12,V_B_13,T_a_14),V_A_12,T_a_14) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_54]) ).

tff(c_6,plain,
    ! [V_A_2,V_C_3,T_a_4] :
      ( c_in(c_Main_OUnionE__1(V_A_2,V_C_3,T_a_4),V_C_3,tc_set(T_a_4))
      | ~ c_in(V_A_2,c_Union(V_C_3,T_a_4),T_a_4) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_37]) ).

tff(c_8,plain,
    ! [V_A_5,V_C_6,T_a_7] :
      ( c_in(V_A_5,c_Main_OUnionE__1(V_A_5,V_C_6,T_a_7),T_a_7)
      | ~ c_in(V_A_5,c_Union(V_C_6,T_a_7),T_a_7) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_42]) ).

tff(c_4,plain,
    ! [V_U_1] :
      ( ~ c_in(V_U_1,v_Y,tc_set(tc_set(t_a)))
      | c_lessequals(V_U_1,v_m,tc_set(tc_set(t_a))) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_32]) ).

tff(c_27,plain,
    ! [V_c_25,V_B_26,T_a_27,V_A_28] :
      ( c_in(V_c_25,V_B_26,T_a_27)
      | ~ c_lessequals(V_A_28,V_B_26,tc_set(T_a_27))
      | ~ c_in(V_c_25,V_A_28,T_a_27) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_50]) ).

tff(c_50,plain,
    ! [V_c_41,V_U_42] :
      ( c_in(V_c_41,v_m,tc_set(t_a))
      | ~ c_in(V_c_41,V_U_42,tc_set(t_a))
      | ~ c_in(V_U_42,v_Y,tc_set(tc_set(t_a))) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_4,c_27]) ).

tff(c_173,plain,
    ! [V_A_60,V_C_61] :
      ( c_in(V_A_60,v_m,tc_set(t_a))
      | ~ c_in(c_Main_OUnionE__1(V_A_60,V_C_61,tc_set(t_a)),v_Y,tc_set(tc_set(t_a)))
      | ~ c_in(V_A_60,c_Union(V_C_61,tc_set(t_a)),tc_set(t_a)) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_8,c_50]) ).

tff(c_184,plain,
    ! [V_A_62] :
      ( c_in(V_A_62,v_m,tc_set(t_a))
      | ~ c_in(V_A_62,c_Union(v_Y,tc_set(t_a)),tc_set(t_a)) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_6,c_173]) ).

tff(c_225,plain,
    ! [V_B_64] :
      ( c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(c_Union(v_Y,tc_set(t_a)),V_B_64,tc_set(t_a)),v_m,tc_set(t_a))
      | c_lessequals(c_Union(v_Y,tc_set(t_a)),V_B_64,tc_set(tc_set(t_a))) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_12,c_184]) ).

tff(c_14,plain,
    ! [V_A_15,V_B_16,T_a_17] :
      ( c_lessequals(V_A_15,V_B_16,tc_set(T_a_17))
      | ~ c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(V_A_15,V_B_16,T_a_17),V_B_16,T_a_17) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_59]) ).

tff(c_234,plain,
    c_lessequals(c_Union(v_Y,tc_set(t_a)),v_m,tc_set(tc_set(t_a))),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_225,c_14]) ).

tff(c_241,plain,
    $false,
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_2,c_2,c_234]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.14  % Problem  : SET842-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.14/0.15  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.16/0.36  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.16/0.36  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 16:31:50 EDT 2023
% 0.16/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 3.10/1.91  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.10/1.92  
% 3.10/1.92  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.37/1.95  
% 3.37/1.95  Inference rules
% 3.37/1.95  ----------------------
% 3.37/1.95  #Ref     : 0
% 3.37/1.95  #Sup     : 52
% 3.37/1.95  #Fact    : 2
% 3.37/1.95  #Define  : 0
% 3.37/1.95  #Split   : 0
% 3.37/1.95  #Chain   : 0
% 3.37/1.95  #Close   : 0
% 3.37/1.95  
% 3.37/1.95  Ordering : KBO
% 3.37/1.95  
% 3.37/1.95  Simplification rules
% 3.37/1.95  ----------------------
% 3.37/1.95  #Subsume      : 8
% 3.37/1.95  #Demod        : 4
% 3.37/1.95  #Tautology    : 3
% 3.37/1.95  #SimpNegUnit  : 1
% 3.37/1.95  #BackRed      : 0
% 3.37/1.95  
% 3.37/1.95  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 3.37/1.95  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 3.37/1.95  
% 3.37/1.95  Timing (in seconds)
% 3.37/1.95  ----------------------
% 3.37/1.95  Preprocessing        : 0.43
% 3.37/1.95  Parsing              : 0.24
% 3.37/1.95  CNF conversion       : 0.02
% 3.37/1.95  Main loop            : 0.35
% 3.37/1.95  Inferencing          : 0.16
% 3.37/1.95  Reduction            : 0.06
% 3.37/1.95  Demodulation         : 0.04
% 3.37/1.95  BG Simplification    : 0.02
% 3.37/1.95  Subsumption          : 0.09
% 3.37/1.95  Abstraction          : 0.01
% 3.37/1.95  MUC search           : 0.00
% 3.37/1.95  Cooper               : 0.00
% 3.37/1.95  Total                : 0.83
% 3.37/1.95  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 3.37/1.95  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 3.37/1.95  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 3.37/1.95  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------