TSTP Solution File: SET841-2 by E-SAT---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem : SET841-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:24:08 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.17s 0.43s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.17s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 16 ( 14 unt; 2 nHn; 14 RR)
% Number of literals : 24 ( 5 equ; 8 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 5 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 4 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 12 ( 2 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_4,negated_conjecture,
~ c_lessequals(c_Zorn_Osucc(v_S,v_x,t_a),v_m,tc_set(tc_set(t_a))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.t9hSblZ1W0/E---3.1_3662.p',cls_conjecture_4) ).
cnf(cls_Zorn_OTFin__subsetD_0,axiom,
( c_lessequals(c_Zorn_Osucc(X2,X1,X3),X4,tc_set(tc_set(X3)))
| X1 = X4
| ~ c_in(X1,c_Zorn_OTFin(X2,X3),tc_set(tc_set(X3)))
| ~ c_in(X4,c_Zorn_OTFin(X2,X3),tc_set(tc_set(X3)))
| ~ c_lessequals(X1,X4,tc_set(tc_set(X3))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.t9hSblZ1W0/E---3.1_3662.p',cls_Zorn_OTFin__subsetD_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
c_in(v_m,c_Zorn_OTFin(v_S,t_a),tc_set(tc_set(t_a))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.t9hSblZ1W0/E---3.1_3662.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_2,negated_conjecture,
c_in(v_x,c_Zorn_OTFin(v_S,t_a),tc_set(tc_set(t_a))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.t9hSblZ1W0/E---3.1_3662.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_3,negated_conjecture,
c_lessequals(v_x,v_m,tc_set(tc_set(t_a))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.t9hSblZ1W0/E---3.1_3662.p',cls_conjecture_3) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
v_m = c_Zorn_Osucc(v_S,v_m,t_a),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.t9hSblZ1W0/E---3.1_3662.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).
cnf(cls_Set_Osubset__refl_0,axiom,
c_lessequals(X1,X1,tc_set(X2)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.t9hSblZ1W0/E---3.1_3662.p',cls_Set_Osubset__refl_0) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ c_lessequals(c_Zorn_Osucc(v_S,v_x,t_a),v_m,tc_set(tc_set(t_a))),
cls_conjecture_4 ).
cnf(c_0_8,axiom,
( c_lessequals(c_Zorn_Osucc(X2,X1,X3),X4,tc_set(tc_set(X3)))
| X1 = X4
| ~ c_in(X1,c_Zorn_OTFin(X2,X3),tc_set(tc_set(X3)))
| ~ c_in(X4,c_Zorn_OTFin(X2,X3),tc_set(tc_set(X3)))
| ~ c_lessequals(X1,X4,tc_set(tc_set(X3))) ),
cls_Zorn_OTFin__subsetD_0 ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
c_in(v_m,c_Zorn_OTFin(v_S,t_a),tc_set(tc_set(t_a))),
cls_conjecture_0 ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
c_in(v_x,c_Zorn_OTFin(v_S,t_a),tc_set(tc_set(t_a))),
cls_conjecture_2 ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
c_lessequals(v_x,v_m,tc_set(tc_set(t_a))),
cls_conjecture_3 ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
v_x = v_m,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),c_0_9]),c_0_10]),c_0_11])]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
v_m = c_Zorn_Osucc(v_S,v_m,t_a),
cls_conjecture_1 ).
cnf(c_0_14,axiom,
c_lessequals(X1,X1,tc_set(X2)),
cls_Set_Osubset__refl_0 ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_12]),c_0_13]),c_0_14])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SET841-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.12/0.32 % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.32 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.12/0.32 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.32 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 16:40:59 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.32 % CPUTime :
% 0.17/0.42 Running first-order model finding
% 0.17/0.42 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.t9hSblZ1W0/E---3.1_3662.p
% 0.17/0.43 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.17/0.43 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.43 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.43 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.17/0.43 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.43 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.43 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.43 # new_bool_3 with pid 3779 completed with status 0
% 0.17/0.43 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.17/0.43 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.43 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.43 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.17/0.43 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.43 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.17/0.43 # Search class: FGUSF-FFSS32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.17/0.43 # partial match(1): FGUSF-FFSF32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.17/0.43 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.17/0.43 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.43 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 3782 completed with status 0
% 0.17/0.43 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.17/0.43 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.43 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.43 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.17/0.43 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.43 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.17/0.43 # Search class: FGUSF-FFSS32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.17/0.43 # partial match(1): FGUSF-FFSF32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.17/0.43 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.17/0.43 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.43 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.17/0.43 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.17/0.43
% 0.17/0.43 # Proof found!
% 0.17/0.43 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.17/0.43 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.17/0.43 # Parsed axioms : 7
% 0.17/0.43 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.17/0.43 # Initial clauses : 7
% 0.17/0.43 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.17/0.43 # Initial clauses in saturation : 7
% 0.17/0.43 # Processed clauses : 15
% 0.17/0.43 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.17/0.43 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.17/0.43 # ...remaining for further processing : 15
% 0.17/0.43 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.17/0.43 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.17/0.43 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.17/0.43 # Backward-rewritten : 2
% 0.17/0.43 # Generated clauses : 3
% 0.17/0.43 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1
% 0.17/0.43 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.17/0.43 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.17/0.43 # Paramodulations : 3
% 0.17/0.43 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.17/0.43 # NegExts : 0
% 0.17/0.43 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.17/0.43 # Total rewrite steps : 10
% 0.17/0.43 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.17/0.43 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.17/0.43 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.17/0.43 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.17/0.43 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.17/0.43 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.17/0.43 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.43 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.43 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.43 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.43 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.43 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.43 # Current number of processed clauses : 6
% 0.17/0.43 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 4
% 0.17/0.43 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.17/0.43 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.17/0.43 # Non-unit-clauses : 1
% 0.17/0.43 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.17/0.43 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.17/0.43 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.17/0.43 # Current number of archived clauses : 9
% 0.17/0.43 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.17/0.43 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.17/0.43 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.17/0.43 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.17/0.43 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.17/0.43 # BW rewrite match attempts : 3
% 0.17/0.43 # BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.17/0.43 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.17/0.43 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.17/0.43 # Termbank termtop insertions : 274
% 0.17/0.43
% 0.17/0.43 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/0.43 # User time : 0.002 s
% 0.17/0.43 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.17/0.43 # Total time : 0.004 s
% 0.17/0.43 # Maximum resident set size: 1640 pages
% 0.17/0.43
% 0.17/0.43 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/0.43 # User time : 0.004 s
% 0.17/0.43 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.17/0.43 # Total time : 0.007 s
% 0.17/0.43 # Maximum resident set size: 1676 pages
% 0.17/0.43 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------