TSTP Solution File: SET839-2 by E-SAT---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem  : SET839-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:24:08 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.50s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   19 (   6 unt;   7 nHn;  11 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   41 (   4 equ;  16 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   3 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   41 (   6 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
    ( c_lessequals(X1,X2,tc_set(t_a))
    | ~ c_in(X2,v_S,tc_set(t_a))
    | ~ c_in(X1,v_S,tc_set(t_a)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.nCJVKbpKoS/E---3.1_11403.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).

cnf(cls_Set_OsubsetI_0,axiom,
    ( c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(X1,X2,X3),X1,X3)
    | c_lessequals(X1,X2,tc_set(X3)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.nCJVKbpKoS/E---3.1_11403.p',cls_Set_OsubsetI_0) ).

cnf(cls_Set_Osubset__antisym_0,axiom,
    ( X2 = X1
    | ~ c_lessequals(X1,X2,tc_set(X3))
    | ~ c_lessequals(X2,X1,tc_set(X3)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.nCJVKbpKoS/E---3.1_11403.p',cls_Set_Osubset__antisym_0) ).

cnf(cls_Set_OsubsetI_1,axiom,
    ( c_lessequals(X1,X2,tc_set(X3))
    | ~ c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(X1,X2,X3),X2,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.nCJVKbpKoS/E---3.1_11403.p',cls_Set_OsubsetI_1) ).

cnf(cls_Set_OinsertCI_1,axiom,
    c_in(X1,c_insert(X1,X2,X3),X3),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.nCJVKbpKoS/E---3.1_11403.p',cls_Set_OinsertCI_1) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_lessequals(v_S,c_insert(X1,c_emptyset,tc_set(t_a)),tc_set(tc_set(t_a))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.nCJVKbpKoS/E---3.1_11403.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).

cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ( c_lessequals(X1,X2,tc_set(t_a))
    | ~ c_in(X2,v_S,tc_set(t_a))
    | ~ c_in(X1,v_S,tc_set(t_a)) ),
    cls_conjecture_1 ).

cnf(c_0_7,axiom,
    ( c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(X1,X2,X3),X1,X3)
    | c_lessequals(X1,X2,tc_set(X3)) ),
    cls_Set_OsubsetI_0 ).

cnf(c_0_8,axiom,
    ( X2 = X1
    | ~ c_lessequals(X1,X2,tc_set(X3))
    | ~ c_lessequals(X2,X1,tc_set(X3)) ),
    cls_Set_Osubset__antisym_0 ).

cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ( c_lessequals(X1,c_Main_OsubsetI__1(v_S,X2,tc_set(t_a)),tc_set(t_a))
    | c_lessequals(v_S,X2,tc_set(tc_set(t_a)))
    | ~ c_in(X1,v_S,tc_set(t_a)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ( c_Main_OsubsetI__1(v_S,X1,tc_set(t_a)) = X2
    | c_lessequals(v_S,X1,tc_set(tc_set(t_a)))
    | ~ c_in(X2,v_S,tc_set(t_a))
    | ~ c_lessequals(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(v_S,X1,tc_set(t_a)),X2,tc_set(t_a)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,axiom,
    ( c_lessequals(X1,X2,tc_set(X3))
    | ~ c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(X1,X2,X3),X2,X3) ),
    cls_Set_OsubsetI_1 ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    ( c_Main_OsubsetI__1(v_S,X1,tc_set(t_a)) = c_Main_OsubsetI__1(v_S,X2,tc_set(t_a))
    | c_lessequals(v_S,X2,tc_set(tc_set(t_a)))
    | c_lessequals(v_S,X1,tc_set(tc_set(t_a))) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_9]),c_0_7]),c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    ( c_lessequals(v_S,X1,tc_set(tc_set(t_a)))
    | c_lessequals(v_S,X2,tc_set(tc_set(t_a)))
    | ~ c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(v_S,X1,tc_set(t_a)),X2,tc_set(t_a)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,axiom,
    c_in(X1,c_insert(X1,X2,X3),X3),
    cls_Set_OinsertCI_1 ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_lessequals(v_S,c_insert(X1,c_emptyset,tc_set(t_a)),tc_set(tc_set(t_a))),
    cls_conjecture_0 ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    ( c_lessequals(v_S,c_insert(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(v_S,X1,tc_set(t_a)),X2,tc_set(t_a)),tc_set(tc_set(t_a)))
    | c_lessequals(v_S,X1,tc_set(tc_set(t_a))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    c_lessequals(v_S,X1,tc_set(tc_set(t_a))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_17])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.13  % Problem    : SET839-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.11/0.15  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.36  % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.36  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.13/0.36  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.36  % DateTime   : Mon Oct  2 17:41:36 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.36  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.19/0.49  Running first-order model finding
% 0.19/0.49  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.nCJVKbpKoS/E---3.1_11403.p
% 0.19/0.50  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.19/0.50  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.50  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # sh5l with pid 11483 completed with status 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Result found by sh5l
% 0.19/0.50  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.50  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.19/0.50  # Search class: FGUSF-FFSF32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.50  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 11488 completed with status 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.19/0.50  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.50  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.19/0.50  # Search class: FGUSF-FFSF32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.50  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.19/0.50  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.19/0.50  
% 0.19/0.50  # Proof found!
% 0.19/0.50  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.19/0.50  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.50  # Parsed axioms                        : 6
% 0.19/0.50  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Initial clauses                      : 6
% 0.19/0.50  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 6
% 0.19/0.50  # Processed clauses                    : 19
% 0.19/0.50  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # ...remaining for further processing  : 19
% 0.19/0.50  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Backward-rewritten                   : 6
% 0.19/0.50  # Generated clauses                    : 25
% 0.19/0.50  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 23
% 0.19/0.50  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 2
% 0.19/0.50  # Paramodulations                      : 25
% 0.19/0.50  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Total rewrite steps                  : 8
% 0.19/0.50  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.19/0.50  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.19/0.50  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.19/0.50  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.19/0.50  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.19/0.50  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.19/0.50  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.19/0.50  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.19/0.50  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.19/0.50  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.19/0.50  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.19/0.50  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.19/0.50  # Current number of processed clauses  : 7
% 0.19/0.50  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 3
% 0.19/0.50  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.19/0.50  #    Negative unit clauses             : 0
% 0.19/0.50  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 4
% 0.19/0.50  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 16
% 0.19/0.50  # ...number of literals in the above   : 60
% 0.19/0.50  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Current number of archived clauses   : 12
% 0.19/0.50  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 26
% 0.19/0.50  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 16
% 0.19/0.50  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 2
% 0.19/0.50  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3
% 0.19/0.50  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 8
% 0.19/0.50  # BW rewrite match successes           : 4
% 0.19/0.50  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 863
% 0.19/0.50  
% 0.19/0.50  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.50  # User time                : 0.003 s
% 0.19/0.50  # System time              : 0.001 s
% 0.19/0.50  # Total time               : 0.004 s
% 0.19/0.50  # Maximum resident set size: 1640 pages
% 0.19/0.50  
% 0.19/0.50  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.50  # User time                : 0.003 s
% 0.19/0.50  # System time              : 0.004 s
% 0.19/0.50  # Total time               : 0.007 s
% 0.19/0.50  # Maximum resident set size: 1676 pages
% 0.19/0.50  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------