TSTP Solution File: SET838-1 by Zipperpin---2.1.9999

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem  : SET838-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : NO INFORMATION
% Format   : NO INFORMATION
% Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.qD0XZdq2yA true

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 16:16:19 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.21s 0.80s
% Output   : Refutation 0.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : SET838-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.13  % Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.qD0XZdq2yA true
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Sat Aug 26 09:17:40 EDT 2023
% 0.20/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.34  % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.20/0.34  % File         : /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.34  % Number of cores: 8
% 0.20/0.34  % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.20/0.35  % Running in FO mode
% 0.21/0.64  % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.21/0.64  % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.21/0.64  % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.21/0.72  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.21/0.72  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.21/0.72  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.21/0.74  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.21/0.74  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 0.21/0.74  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.21/0.79  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 0.21/0.80  % Solved by fo/fo7.sh.
% 0.21/0.80  % done 8 iterations in 0.038s
% 0.21/0.80  % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 0.21/0.80  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.21/0.80  thf(v_f_type, type, v_f: $i > $i).
% 0.21/0.80  thf(v_xa_type, type, v_xa: $i > $i).
% 0.21/0.80  thf(v_g_type, type, v_g: $i > $i).
% 0.21/0.80  thf(v_x_type, type, v_x: $i).
% 0.21/0.80  thf(cls_conjecture_2, conjecture,
% 0.21/0.80    (~( ( ( v_g @ ( v_f @ V_U ) ) != ( V_U ) ) | 
% 0.21/0.80        ( ( v_g @ ( v_f @ ( v_xa @ V_U ) ) ) = ( v_xa @ V_U ) ) ))).
% 0.21/0.80  thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture,
% 0.21/0.80    (( ( v_g @ ( v_f @ V_U ) ) != ( V_U ) ) | 
% 0.21/0.80     ( ( v_g @ ( v_f @ ( v_xa @ V_U ) ) ) = ( v_xa @ V_U ) )),
% 0.21/0.80    inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [cls_conjecture_2])).
% 0.21/0.80  thf(zip_derived_cl1, plain,
% 0.21/0.80      (![X0 : $i]:
% 0.21/0.80         (((v_g @ (v_f @ X0)) != (X0))
% 0.21/0.80          | ((v_g @ (v_f @ (v_xa @ X0))) = (v_xa @ X0)))),
% 0.21/0.80      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 0.21/0.80  thf(cls_conjecture_1, conjecture,
% 0.21/0.80    (~( ( ( v_f @ ( v_g @ V_U ) ) != ( V_U ) ) | ( ( V_U ) = ( v_x ) ) ))).
% 0.21/0.80  thf(zf_stmt_1, negated_conjecture,
% 0.21/0.80    (( ( v_f @ ( v_g @ V_U ) ) != ( V_U ) ) | ( ( V_U ) = ( v_x ) )),
% 0.21/0.80    inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [cls_conjecture_1])).
% 0.21/0.80  thf(zip_derived_cl2, plain,
% 0.21/0.80      (![X0 : $i]: (((v_f @ (v_g @ X0)) != (X0)) | ((X0) = (v_x)))),
% 0.21/0.80      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_1])).
% 0.21/0.80  thf(zip_derived_cl5, plain,
% 0.21/0.80      (![X0 : $i]:
% 0.21/0.80         (((v_f @ (v_xa @ X0)) != (v_f @ (v_xa @ X0)))
% 0.21/0.80          | ((v_g @ (v_f @ X0)) != (X0))
% 0.21/0.80          | ((v_f @ (v_xa @ X0)) = (v_x)))),
% 0.21/0.80      inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1, zip_derived_cl2])).
% 0.21/0.80  thf(zip_derived_cl7, plain,
% 0.21/0.80      (![X0 : $i]:
% 0.21/0.80         (((v_f @ (v_xa @ X0)) = (v_x)) | ((v_g @ (v_f @ X0)) != (X0)))),
% 0.21/0.80      inference('simplify', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl5])).
% 0.21/0.80  thf(zip_derived_cl1, plain,
% 0.21/0.80      (![X0 : $i]:
% 0.21/0.80         (((v_g @ (v_f @ X0)) != (X0))
% 0.21/0.80          | ((v_g @ (v_f @ (v_xa @ X0))) = (v_xa @ X0)))),
% 0.21/0.80      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 0.21/0.80  thf(zip_derived_cl8, plain,
% 0.21/0.80      (![X0 : $i]:
% 0.21/0.80         (((v_g @ v_x) = (v_xa @ X0))
% 0.21/0.80          | ((v_g @ (v_f @ X0)) != (X0))
% 0.21/0.80          | ((v_g @ (v_f @ X0)) != (X0)))),
% 0.21/0.80      inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl7, zip_derived_cl1])).
% 0.21/0.80  thf(zip_derived_cl9, plain,
% 0.21/0.80      (![X0 : $i]: (((v_g @ (v_f @ X0)) != (X0)) | ((v_g @ v_x) = (v_xa @ X0)))),
% 0.21/0.80      inference('simplify', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl8])).
% 0.21/0.80  thf(cls_conjecture_3, conjecture,
% 0.21/0.80    (~( ( ( v_g @ ( v_f @ V_U ) ) != ( V_U ) ) | ( ( v_xa @ V_U ) != ( V_U ) ) ))).
% 0.21/0.80  thf(zf_stmt_2, negated_conjecture,
% 0.21/0.80    (( ( v_g @ ( v_f @ V_U ) ) != ( V_U ) ) | ( ( v_xa @ V_U ) != ( V_U ) )),
% 0.21/0.80    inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [cls_conjecture_3])).
% 0.21/0.80  thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 0.21/0.80      (![X0 : $i]: (((v_g @ (v_f @ X0)) != (X0)) | ((v_xa @ X0) != (X0)))),
% 0.21/0.80      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_2])).
% 0.21/0.80  thf(zip_derived_cl10, plain,
% 0.21/0.80      (![X0 : $i]:
% 0.21/0.80         (((v_g @ v_x) != (X0))
% 0.21/0.80          | ((v_g @ (v_f @ X0)) != (X0))
% 0.21/0.80          | ((v_g @ (v_f @ X0)) != (X0)))),
% 0.21/0.80      inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl9, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 0.21/0.80  thf(zip_derived_cl13, plain,
% 0.21/0.80      (![X0 : $i]: (((v_g @ (v_f @ X0)) != (X0)) | ((v_g @ v_x) != (X0)))),
% 0.21/0.80      inference('simplify', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl10])).
% 0.21/0.80  thf(zip_derived_cl17, plain, (((v_g @ (v_f @ (v_g @ v_x))) != (v_g @ v_x))),
% 0.21/0.80      inference('eq_res', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl13])).
% 0.21/0.80  thf(cls_conjecture_0, conjecture, (( v_f @ ( v_g @ v_x ) ) != ( v_x ))).
% 0.21/0.80  thf(zf_stmt_3, negated_conjecture, (( v_f @ ( v_g @ v_x ) ) = ( v_x )),
% 0.21/0.80    inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [cls_conjecture_0])).
% 0.21/0.80  thf(zip_derived_cl3, plain, (((v_f @ (v_g @ v_x)) = (v_x))),
% 0.21/0.80      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_3])).
% 0.21/0.80  thf(zip_derived_cl18, plain, (((v_g @ v_x) != (v_g @ v_x))),
% 0.21/0.80      inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl17, zip_derived_cl3])).
% 0.21/0.80  thf(zip_derived_cl19, plain, ($false),
% 0.21/0.80      inference('simplify', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl18])).
% 0.21/0.80  
% 0.21/0.80  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.21/0.80  
% 0.21/0.80  
% 0.21/0.80  % Terminating...
% 1.27/0.84  % Runner terminated.
% 1.27/0.85  % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------