TSTP Solution File: SET836-1 by SnakeForV-SAT---1.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
% Problem  : SET836-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 18:25:49 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 2.01s 0.63s
% Output   : Refutation 2.01s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    7 (   5 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   10 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    7 (   4   ~;   3   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   4 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    5 (   5   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1378,plain,
    $false,
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f1376,f1361]) ).

fof(f1361,axiom,
    ~ c_in(v_x,v_X,t_a),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_3) ).

fof(f1376,plain,
    c_in(v_x,v_X,t_a),
    inference(resolution,[],[f1375,f1359]) ).

fof(f1359,axiom,
    c_lessequals(v_Z,v_X,tc_set(t_a)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).

fof(f1375,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ c_lessequals(v_Z,X0,tc_set(t_a))
      | c_in(v_x,X0,t_a) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f306,f1360]) ).

fof(f1360,axiom,
    c_in(v_x,v_Z,t_a),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).

fof(f306,axiom,
    ! [X2,X34,X15,X13] :
      ( ~ c_in(X34,X13,X2)
      | c_in(X34,X15,X2)
      | ~ c_lessequals(X13,X15,tc_set(X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OsubsetD_0) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.11  % Problem    : SET836-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.11/0.12  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime   : Tue Aug 30 14:22:05 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.18/0.56  % (11738)dis+34_1:32_abs=on:add=off:bsr=on:gsp=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=48:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/48Mi)
% 0.18/0.58  % (11756)ott+11_1:1_drc=off:nwc=5.0:slsq=on:slsqc=1:spb=goal_then_units:to=lpo:i=467:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/467Mi)
% 0.18/0.58  % (11748)ott+11_2:3_av=off:fde=unused:nwc=5.0:tgt=ground:i=75:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/75Mi)
% 0.18/0.59  % (11739)fmb+10_1:1_fmbsr=2.0:nm=4:skr=on:i=51:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/51Mi)
% 0.18/0.59  % (11740)dis+10_1:1_fsd=on:sp=occurrence:i=7:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/7Mi)
% 0.18/0.60  % (11759)ins+10_1:1_awrs=decay:awrsf=30:bsr=unit_only:foolp=on:igrr=8/457:igs=10:igwr=on:nwc=1.5:sp=weighted_frequency:to=lpo:uhcvi=on:i=68:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/68Mi)
% 1.69/0.61  % (11740)Instruction limit reached!
% 1.69/0.61  % (11740)------------------------------
% 1.69/0.61  % (11740)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 1.69/0.61  % (11740)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 1.69/0.61  % (11740)Termination reason: Unknown
% 1.69/0.61  % (11740)Termination phase: Saturation
% 1.69/0.61  
% 1.69/0.61  % (11740)Memory used [KB]: 6652
% 1.69/0.61  % (11740)Time elapsed: 0.014 s
% 1.69/0.61  % (11740)Instructions burned: 8 (million)
% 1.69/0.61  % (11740)------------------------------
% 1.69/0.61  % (11740)------------------------------
% 1.69/0.61  % (11752)ott+4_1:1_av=off:bd=off:nwc=5.0:rp=on:s2a=on:s2at=2.0:slsq=on:slsqc=2:slsql=off:slsqr=1,2:sp=frequency:i=100:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/100Mi)
% 1.69/0.61  % (11747)ins+10_1:1_awrs=decay:awrsf=30:bsr=unit_only:foolp=on:igrr=8/457:igs=10:igwr=on:nwc=1.5:sp=weighted_frequency:to=lpo:uhcvi=on:i=68:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/68Mi)
% 1.69/0.62  % (11751)ott+10_1:1_tgt=ground:i=100:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/100Mi)
% 2.01/0.63  % (11746)ott+10_1:5_bd=off:tgt=full:i=99:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/99Mi)
% 2.01/0.63  % (11756)First to succeed.
% 2.01/0.63  % (11756)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 2.01/0.63  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 2.01/0.63  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 2.01/0.63  % (11756)------------------------------
% 2.01/0.63  % (11756)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 2.01/0.63  % (11756)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 2.01/0.63  % (11756)Termination reason: Refutation
% 2.01/0.63  
% 2.01/0.63  % (11756)Memory used [KB]: 6908
% 2.01/0.63  % (11756)Time elapsed: 0.135 s
% 2.01/0.63  % (11756)Instructions burned: 27 (million)
% 2.01/0.63  % (11756)------------------------------
% 2.01/0.63  % (11756)------------------------------
% 2.01/0.63  % (11732)Success in time 0.291 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------