TSTP Solution File: SET835-2 by CSE---1.6
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE---1.6
% Problem : SET835-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 14:31:16 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.22s 0.60s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.22s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : SET835-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.13 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.17/0.35 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.17/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.17/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.17/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.17/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.17/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.17/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.17/0.35 % DateTime : Sat Aug 26 08:20:59 EDT 2023
% 0.17/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.22/0.54 start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.22/0.59 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.59 % File :CSE---1.6
% 0.22/0.59 % Problem :theBenchmark
% 0.22/0.59 % Transform :cnf
% 0.22/0.59 % Format :tptp:raw
% 0.22/0.59 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.22/0.59
% 0.22/0.59 % Result :Theorem 0.000000s
% 0.22/0.59 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.000000s
% 0.22/0.59 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.59 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.59 % File : SET835-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.22/0.59 % Domain : Set Theory
% 0.22/0.59 % Problem : Problem about set theory
% 0.22/0.59 % Version : [Pau06] axioms : Reduced > Especial.
% 0.22/0.59 % English :
% 0.22/0.59
% 0.22/0.59 % Refs : [Pau06] Paulson (2006), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 0.22/0.59 % Source : [Pau06]
% 0.22/0.59 % Names :
% 0.22/0.59
% 0.22/0.59 % Status : Unsatisfiable
% 0.22/0.59 % Rating : 0.00 v5.4.0, 0.06 v5.3.0, 0.10 v5.2.0, 0.00 v3.2.0
% 0.22/0.59 % Syntax : Number of clauses : 4 ( 3 unt; 0 nHn; 4 RR)
% 0.22/0.59 % Number of literals : 6 ( 0 equ; 3 neg)
% 0.22/0.59 % Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% 0.22/0.59 % Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% 0.22/0.59 % Number of predicates : 2 ( 2 usr; 0 prp; 3-3 aty)
% 0.22/0.59 % Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 4 con; 0-1 aty)
% 0.22/0.59 % Number of variables : 4 ( 0 sgn)
% 0.22/0.59 % SPC : CNF_UNS_RFO_NEQ_HRN
% 0.22/0.59
% 0.22/0.59 % Comments : The problems in the [Pau06] collection each have very many axioms,
% 0.22/0.59 % of which only a small selection are required for the refutation.
% 0.22/0.59 % The mission is to find those few axioms, after which a refutation
% 0.22/0.59 % can be quite easily found. This version has only the necessary
% 0.22/0.59 % axioms.
% 0.22/0.59 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.59 cnf(cls_Set_OsubsetD_0,axiom,
% 0.22/0.59 ( ~ c_in(V_c,V_A,T_a)
% 0.22/0.59 | ~ c_lessequals(V_A,V_B,tc_set(T_a))
% 0.22/0.59 | c_in(V_c,V_B,T_a) ) ).
% 0.22/0.59
% 0.22/0.59 cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
% 0.22/0.59 c_lessequals(v_Y,v_X,tc_set(t_a)) ).
% 0.22/0.59
% 0.22/0.59 cnf(cls_conjecture_2,negated_conjecture,
% 0.22/0.59 c_in(v_x,v_Y,t_a) ).
% 0.22/0.59
% 0.22/0.59 cnf(cls_conjecture_3,negated_conjecture,
% 0.22/0.59 ~ c_in(v_x,v_X,t_a) ).
% 0.22/0.59
% 0.22/0.59 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.59 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.59 % Proof found
% 0.22/0.60 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.22/0.60 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.22/0.60 %ClaNum:4(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.22/0.60 %VarNum:9(SingletonVarNum:4)
% 0.22/0.60 %MaxLitNum:3
% 0.22/0.60 %MaxfuncDepth:1
% 0.22/0.60 %SharedTerms:8
% 0.22/0.60 %goalClause: 1 2 3
% 0.22/0.60 %singleGoalClaCount:3
% 0.22/0.60 [1]P1(a1,a2,a3)
% 0.22/0.60 [3]~P1(a1,a4,a3)
% 0.22/0.60 [2]P2(a2,a4,f5(a3))
% 0.22/0.60 [4]P1(x41,x42,x43)+~P1(x41,x44,x43)+~P2(x44,x42,f5(x43))
% 0.22/0.60 %EqnAxiom
% 0.22/0.60
% 0.22/0.60 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.60 cnf(5,plain,
% 0.22/0.60 ($false),
% 0.22/0.60 inference(scs_inference,[],[3,1,2,4]),
% 0.22/0.60 ['proof']).
% 0.22/0.60 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.22/0.60 % Total time :0.000000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------