TSTP Solution File: SET833-2 by Twee---2.4.2

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Twee---2.4.2
% Problem  : SET833-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : parallel-twee %s --tstp --conditional-encoding if --smaller --drop-non-horn --give-up-on-saturation --explain-encoding --formal-proof

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 15:33:25 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.12s 0.37s
% Output   : Proof 0.12s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : SET833-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.13  % Command  : parallel-twee %s --tstp --conditional-encoding if --smaller --drop-non-horn --give-up-on-saturation --explain-encoding --formal-proof
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Sat Aug 26 15:25:57 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.37  Command-line arguments: --flip-ordering --lhs-weight 1 --depth-weight 60 --distributivity-heuristic
% 0.12/0.37  
% 0.12/0.37  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.12/0.37  
% 0.12/0.37  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.12/0.37  Take the following subset of the input axioms:
% 0.12/0.38    fof(cls_Set_OsubsetD_0, axiom, ![V_c, V_A, T_a, V_B]: (~c_in(V_c, V_A, T_a) | (~c_lessequals(V_A, V_B, tc_set(T_a)) | c_in(V_c, V_B, T_a)))).
% 0.12/0.38    fof(cls_conjecture_1, negated_conjecture, c_lessequals(v_Z, v_V, tc_set(t_a))).
% 0.12/0.38    fof(cls_conjecture_2, negated_conjecture, c_in(v_x, v_Z, t_a)).
% 0.12/0.38    fof(cls_conjecture_3, negated_conjecture, ~c_in(v_x, v_V, t_a)).
% 0.12/0.38  
% 0.12/0.38  Now clausify the problem and encode Horn clauses using encoding 3 of
% 0.12/0.38  http://www.cse.chalmers.se/~nicsma/papers/horn.pdf.
% 0.12/0.38  We repeatedly replace C & s=t => u=v by the two clauses:
% 0.12/0.38    fresh(y, y, x1...xn) = u
% 0.12/0.38    C => fresh(s, t, x1...xn) = v
% 0.12/0.38  where fresh is a fresh function symbol and x1..xn are the free
% 0.12/0.38  variables of u and v.
% 0.12/0.38  A predicate p(X) is encoded as p(X)=true (this is sound, because the
% 0.12/0.38  input problem has no model of domain size 1).
% 0.12/0.38  
% 0.12/0.38  The encoding turns the above axioms into the following unit equations and goals:
% 0.12/0.38  
% 0.12/0.38  Axiom 1 (cls_conjecture_2): c_in(v_x, v_Z, t_a) = true.
% 0.12/0.38  Axiom 2 (cls_conjecture_1): c_lessequals(v_Z, v_V, tc_set(t_a)) = true.
% 0.12/0.38  Axiom 3 (cls_Set_OsubsetD_0): fresh2(X, X, Y, Z, W) = true.
% 0.12/0.38  Axiom 4 (cls_Set_OsubsetD_0): fresh(X, X, Y, Z, W, V) = c_in(Y, V, W).
% 0.12/0.38  Axiom 5 (cls_Set_OsubsetD_0): fresh(c_lessequals(X, Y, tc_set(Z)), true, W, X, Z, Y) = fresh2(c_in(W, X, Z), true, W, Z, Y).
% 0.12/0.38  
% 0.12/0.38  Goal 1 (cls_conjecture_3): c_in(v_x, v_V, t_a) = true.
% 0.12/0.38  Proof:
% 0.12/0.38    c_in(v_x, v_V, t_a)
% 0.12/0.38  = { by axiom 4 (cls_Set_OsubsetD_0) R->L }
% 0.12/0.38    fresh(true, true, v_x, v_Z, t_a, v_V)
% 0.12/0.38  = { by axiom 2 (cls_conjecture_1) R->L }
% 0.12/0.38    fresh(c_lessequals(v_Z, v_V, tc_set(t_a)), true, v_x, v_Z, t_a, v_V)
% 0.12/0.38  = { by axiom 5 (cls_Set_OsubsetD_0) }
% 0.12/0.38    fresh2(c_in(v_x, v_Z, t_a), true, v_x, t_a, v_V)
% 0.12/0.38  = { by axiom 1 (cls_conjecture_2) }
% 0.12/0.38    fresh2(true, true, v_x, t_a, v_V)
% 0.12/0.38  = { by axiom 3 (cls_Set_OsubsetD_0) }
% 0.12/0.38    true
% 0.12/0.38  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.12/0.38  
% 0.12/0.38  RESULT: Unsatisfiable (the axioms are contradictory).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------