TSTP Solution File: SET832-2 by SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
% Problem : SET832-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 18:25:48 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.49s
% Output : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 10 ( 7 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 15 ( 1 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 11 ( 6 ~; 5 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 5 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 8 ( 8 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f10,plain,
$false,
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f9,f4]) ).
fof(f4,axiom,
~ c_in(v_x,v_V,t_a),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_3) ).
fof(f9,plain,
c_in(v_x,v_V,t_a),
inference(resolution,[],[f8,f3]) ).
fof(f3,axiom,
c_in(v_x,v_Y,t_a),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).
fof(f8,plain,
! [X0] :
( ~ c_in(X0,v_Y,t_a)
| c_in(X0,v_V,t_a) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f7,f6]) ).
fof(f6,plain,
c_lessequals(v_Y,v_V,sF0),
inference(definition_folding,[],[f2,f5]) ).
fof(f5,plain,
tc_set(t_a) = sF0,
introduced(function_definition,[]) ).
fof(f2,axiom,
c_lessequals(v_Y,v_V,tc_set(t_a)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
fof(f7,plain,
! [X2,X0,X1] :
( ~ c_lessequals(X0,X1,sF0)
| c_in(X2,X1,t_a)
| ~ c_in(X2,X0,t_a) ),
inference(superposition,[],[f1,f5]) ).
fof(f1,axiom,
! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
( ~ c_lessequals(X1,X3,tc_set(X2))
| c_in(X0,X3,X2)
| ~ c_in(X0,X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OsubsetD_0) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11 % Problem : SET832-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.06/0.12 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Tue Aug 30 14:36:21 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.48 % (23398)ott+10_1:5_bd=off:tgt=full:i=99:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/99Mi)
% 0.19/0.48 % (23398)First to succeed.
% 0.19/0.48 % (23415)ott+10_7:2_awrs=decay:awrsf=8:bd=preordered:drc=off:fd=preordered:fde=unused:fsr=off:slsq=on:slsqc=2:slsqr=5,8:sp=const_min:spb=units:to=lpo:i=355:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/355Mi)
% 0.19/0.49 % (23407)ott+3_1:1_gsp=on:lcm=predicate:i=138:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/138Mi)
% 0.19/0.49 % (23398)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.19/0.49 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.49 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.49 % (23398)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.49 % (23398)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.19/0.49 % (23398)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.19/0.49 % (23398)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.19/0.49
% 0.19/0.49 % (23398)Memory used [KB]: 5373
% 0.19/0.49 % (23398)Time elapsed: 0.089 s
% 0.19/0.49 % (23398)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.19/0.49 % (23398)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.49 % (23398)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.49 % (23384)Success in time 0.15 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------