TSTP Solution File: SET832-2 by SnakeForV---1.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SnakeForV---1.0
% Problem  : SET832-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_uns --cores 0 -t %d %s

% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 18:22:26 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.49s
% Output   : Refutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    7 (   5 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   10 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    7 (   4   ~;   3   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   4 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    5 (   5   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f7,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolution,[],[f6,f4]) ).

fof(f4,axiom,
    ~ c_in(v_x,v_V,t_a),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_3) ).

fof(f6,plain,
    c_in(v_x,v_V,t_a),
    inference(resolution,[],[f5,f3]) ).

fof(f3,axiom,
    c_in(v_x,v_Y,t_a),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).

fof(f5,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ c_in(X0,v_Y,t_a)
      | c_in(X0,v_V,t_a) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f2,f1]) ).

fof(f1,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ c_lessequals(X1,X3,tc_set(X2))
      | ~ c_in(X0,X1,X2)
      | c_in(X0,X3,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OsubsetD_0) ).

fof(f2,axiom,
    c_lessequals(v_Y,v_V,tc_set(t_a)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.12  % Problem    : SET832-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.10/0.13  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_uns --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.33  % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.14/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.33  % DateTime   : Tue Aug 30 14:33:51 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.20/0.48  % (703)lrs+30_1:12_av=off:bs=unit_only:fsd=on:gs=on:lwlo=on:newcnf=on:slsq=on:slsqr=1,2:i=3:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/3Mi)
% 0.20/0.49  % (711)lrs+1010_1:1_bd=off:fsr=off:sd=1:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=67:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/67Mi)
% 0.20/0.49  % (711)First to succeed.
% 0.20/0.49  % (711)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.20/0.49  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.49  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.49  % (711)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.49  % (711)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.20/0.49  % (711)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.20/0.49  % (711)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.20/0.49  
% 0.20/0.49  % (711)Memory used [KB]: 5756
% 0.20/0.49  % (711)Time elapsed: 0.083 s
% 0.20/0.49  % (711)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 0.20/0.49  % (711)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.49  % (711)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.49  % (689)Success in time 0.151 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------