TSTP Solution File: SET825-2 by SnakeForV---1.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SnakeForV---1.0
% Problem  : SET825-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_uns --cores 0 -t %d %s

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 18:22:24 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.21s 0.57s
% Output   : Refutation 0.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   15 (   6 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   30 (   9 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   25 (  10   ~;  15   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   10 (  10 usr;   5 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    7 (   7   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f20,plain,
    $false,
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f19,f3]) ).

fof(f3,axiom,
    v_Q(v_n),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).

fof(f19,plain,
    ~ v_Q(v_n),
    inference(backward_demodulation,[],[f4,f15]) ).

fof(f15,plain,
    v_n = v_m,
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f14,f2]) ).

fof(f2,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ c_in(c_Pair(X0,X2,X1,X1),c_Relation_OId,tc_prod(X1,X1))
      | X0 = X2 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Relation_Opair__in__Id__conv__iff1_0) ).

fof(f14,plain,
    ( v_n = v_m
    | c_in(c_Pair(v_n,v_m,tc_nat,tc_nat),c_Relation_OId,tc_prod(tc_nat,tc_nat)) ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f13,f1]) ).

fof(f1,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : c_in(c_Pair(X0,X0,X1,X1),c_Relation_OId,tc_prod(X1,X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Relation_OIdI_0) ).

fof(f13,plain,
    ( c_in(c_Pair(v_n,v_m,tc_nat,tc_nat),c_Relation_OId,tc_prod(tc_nat,tc_nat))
    | v_n = v_m
    | ~ c_in(c_Pair(c_Suc(v_x(c_Relation_OId)),c_Suc(v_x(c_Relation_OId)),tc_nat,tc_nat),c_Relation_OId,tc_prod(tc_nat,tc_nat)) ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f11,f1]) ).

fof(f11,plain,
    ( c_in(c_Pair(v_n,v_m,tc_nat,tc_nat),c_Relation_OId,tc_prod(tc_nat,tc_nat))
    | ~ c_in(c_Pair(c_0,c_0,tc_nat,tc_nat),c_Relation_OId,tc_prod(tc_nat,tc_nat))
    | ~ c_in(c_Pair(c_Suc(v_x(c_Relation_OId)),c_Suc(v_x(c_Relation_OId)),tc_nat,tc_nat),c_Relation_OId,tc_prod(tc_nat,tc_nat))
    | v_n = v_m ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f6,f10]) ).

fof(f10,plain,
    ( v_xa(c_Relation_OId) = v_x(c_Relation_OId)
    | v_n = v_m ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f9,f2]) ).

fof(f9,plain,
    ( c_in(c_Pair(v_n,v_m,tc_nat,tc_nat),c_Relation_OId,tc_prod(tc_nat,tc_nat))
    | v_xa(c_Relation_OId) = v_x(c_Relation_OId) ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f8,f1]) ).

fof(f8,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(c_Pair(c_0,c_0,tc_nat,tc_nat),c_Relation_OId,tc_prod(tc_nat,tc_nat))
    | v_xa(c_Relation_OId) = v_x(c_Relation_OId)
    | c_in(c_Pair(v_n,v_m,tc_nat,tc_nat),c_Relation_OId,tc_prod(tc_nat,tc_nat)) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f2,f5]) ).

fof(f5,axiom,
    ! [X3] :
      ( c_in(c_Pair(v_x(X3),v_xa(X3),tc_nat,tc_nat),X3,tc_prod(tc_nat,tc_nat))
      | ~ c_in(c_Pair(c_0,c_0,tc_nat,tc_nat),X3,tc_prod(tc_nat,tc_nat))
      | c_in(c_Pair(v_n,v_m,tc_nat,tc_nat),X3,tc_prod(tc_nat,tc_nat)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).

fof(f6,axiom,
    ! [X3] :
      ( ~ c_in(c_Pair(c_Suc(v_x(X3)),c_Suc(v_xa(X3)),tc_nat,tc_nat),X3,tc_prod(tc_nat,tc_nat))
      | c_in(c_Pair(v_n,v_m,tc_nat,tc_nat),X3,tc_prod(tc_nat,tc_nat))
      | ~ c_in(c_Pair(c_0,c_0,tc_nat,tc_nat),X3,tc_prod(tc_nat,tc_nat)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_3) ).

fof(f4,axiom,
    ~ v_Q(v_m),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.12  % Problem    : SET825-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.10/0.13  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_uns --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime   : Tue Aug 30 14:06:16 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.21/0.55  % (6533)dis+21_1:1_av=off:er=filter:slsq=on:slsqc=0:slsqr=1,1:sp=frequency:to=lpo:i=49:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/49Mi)
% 0.21/0.56  % (6542)fmb+10_1:1_fmbes=contour:fmbsr=2.0:fmbsso=input_usage:i=6:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/6Mi)
% 0.21/0.56  % (6551)dis+10_1:1_add=large:alpa=false:anc=none:fd=off:lcm=reverse:nwc=5.0:sd=2:sgt=20:ss=included:i=46:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/46Mi)
% 0.21/0.56  % (6533)First to succeed.
% 0.21/0.57  % (6550)lrs+1011_1:1_aac=none:bsr=unit_only:ep=R:sac=on:sos=all:i=37:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/37Mi)
% 0.21/0.57  % (6543)lrs+1_1:1_aac=none:add=large:anc=all_dependent:cond=fast:ep=RST:fsr=off:lma=on:nm=2:sos=on:sp=reverse_arity:stl=30:uhcvi=on:urr=on:i=2:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/2Mi)
% 0.21/0.57  % (6534)lrs+1010_1:4_amm=off:bce=on:sd=1:sos=on:ss=included:i=51:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/51Mi)
% 0.21/0.57  % (6535)lrs+1011_1:1_atotf=0.0306256:ep=RST:mep=off:nm=0:sos=all:i=3:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/3Mi)
% 0.21/0.57  % (6535)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.21/0.57  % (6535)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.57  % (6535)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.21/0.57  % (6535)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.21/0.57  % (6535)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.21/0.57  % (6535)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.21/0.57  
% 0.21/0.57  % (6535)Memory used [KB]: 5756
% 0.21/0.57  % (6535)Time elapsed: 0.132 s
% 0.21/0.57  % (6535)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.21/0.57  % (6535)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.57  % (6535)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.57  % (6549)ott+21_1:1_erd=off:s2a=on:sac=on:sd=1:sgt=64:sos=on:ss=included:st=3.0:to=lpo:urr=on:i=97:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/97Mi)
% 0.21/0.57  TRYING [1]
% 0.21/0.57  % (6534)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.21/0.57  % (6543)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.21/0.57  % (6543)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.57  % (6543)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.21/0.57  % (6533)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.21/0.57  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.21/0.57  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.57  % (6533)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.57  % (6533)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.21/0.57  % (6533)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.21/0.57  % (6533)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.21/0.57  
% 0.21/0.57  % (6533)Memory used [KB]: 1279
% 0.21/0.57  % (6533)Time elapsed: 0.123 s
% 0.21/0.57  % (6533)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.21/0.57  % (6533)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.57  % (6533)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.57  % (6526)Success in time 0.213 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------