TSTP Solution File: SET825-2 by CSE_E---1.5

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.5
% Problem  : SET825-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 14:35:44 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.59s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :   18
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   28 (   8 unt;  12 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   28 (   6 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   22 (  10   ~;  12   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   13 (   7   >;   6   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   10 (  10 usr;   5 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   14 (   0 sgn;   0   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(decl_22,type,
    c_Pair: ( $i * $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_23,type,
    c_Relation_OId: $i ).

tff(decl_24,type,
    tc_prod: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_25,type,
    c_in: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(decl_26,type,
    v_n: $i ).

tff(decl_27,type,
    v_Q: $i > $o ).

tff(decl_28,type,
    v_m: $i ).

tff(decl_29,type,
    tc_nat: $i ).

tff(decl_30,type,
    v_x: $i > $i ).

tff(decl_31,type,
    v_xa: $i > $i ).

tff(decl_32,type,
    c_0: $i ).

tff(decl_33,type,
    c_Suc: $i > $i ).

cnf(cls_Relation_Opair__in__Id__conv__iff1_0,axiom,
    ( X1 = X2
    | ~ c_in(c_Pair(X1,X2,X3,X3),c_Relation_OId,tc_prod(X3,X3)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Relation_Opair__in__Id__conv__iff1_0) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_2,negated_conjecture,
    ( c_in(c_Pair(v_n,v_m,tc_nat,tc_nat),X1,tc_prod(tc_nat,tc_nat))
    | c_in(c_Pair(v_x(X1),v_xa(X1),tc_nat,tc_nat),X1,tc_prod(tc_nat,tc_nat))
    | ~ c_in(c_Pair(c_0,c_0,tc_nat,tc_nat),X1,tc_prod(tc_nat,tc_nat)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).

cnf(cls_Relation_OIdI_0,axiom,
    c_in(c_Pair(X1,X1,X2,X2),c_Relation_OId,tc_prod(X2,X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Relation_OIdI_0) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_3,negated_conjecture,
    ( c_in(c_Pair(v_n,v_m,tc_nat,tc_nat),X1,tc_prod(tc_nat,tc_nat))
    | ~ c_in(c_Pair(c_Suc(v_x(X1)),c_Suc(v_xa(X1)),tc_nat,tc_nat),X1,tc_prod(tc_nat,tc_nat))
    | ~ c_in(c_Pair(c_0,c_0,tc_nat,tc_nat),X1,tc_prod(tc_nat,tc_nat)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_3) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
    ~ v_Q(v_m),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
    v_Q(v_n),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).

cnf(c_0_6,axiom,
    ( X1 = X2
    | ~ c_in(c_Pair(X1,X2,X3,X3),c_Relation_OId,tc_prod(X3,X3)) ),
    cls_Relation_Opair__in__Id__conv__iff1_0 ).

cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ( c_in(c_Pair(v_n,v_m,tc_nat,tc_nat),X1,tc_prod(tc_nat,tc_nat))
    | c_in(c_Pair(v_x(X1),v_xa(X1),tc_nat,tc_nat),X1,tc_prod(tc_nat,tc_nat))
    | ~ c_in(c_Pair(c_0,c_0,tc_nat,tc_nat),X1,tc_prod(tc_nat,tc_nat)) ),
    cls_conjecture_2 ).

cnf(c_0_8,axiom,
    c_in(c_Pair(X1,X1,X2,X2),c_Relation_OId,tc_prod(X2,X2)),
    cls_Relation_OIdI_0 ).

cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ( v_xa(c_Relation_OId) = v_x(c_Relation_OId)
    | c_in(c_Pair(v_n,v_m,tc_nat,tc_nat),c_Relation_OId,tc_prod(tc_nat,tc_nat)) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]),c_0_8])]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ( c_in(c_Pair(v_n,v_m,tc_nat,tc_nat),X1,tc_prod(tc_nat,tc_nat))
    | ~ c_in(c_Pair(c_Suc(v_x(X1)),c_Suc(v_xa(X1)),tc_nat,tc_nat),X1,tc_prod(tc_nat,tc_nat))
    | ~ c_in(c_Pair(c_0,c_0,tc_nat,tc_nat),X1,tc_prod(tc_nat,tc_nat)) ),
    cls_conjecture_3 ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ( v_xa(c_Relation_OId) = v_x(c_Relation_OId)
    | v_m = v_n ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    ~ v_Q(v_m),
    cls_conjecture_1 ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    v_m = v_n,
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_8]),c_0_8])]),c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    v_Q(v_n),
    cls_conjecture_0 ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),c_0_14])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13  % Problem    : SET825-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.13  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime   : Sat Aug 26 11:17:09 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.57  start to proof: theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.59  % Version  : CSE_E---1.5
% 0.20/0.59  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.59  % Proof found
% 0.20/0.59  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.59  % SZS output start Proof
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.59  % Total time : 0.003000 s
% 0.20/0.59  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.20/0.59  % Total time : 0.006000 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------