TSTP Solution File: SET822-2 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : SET822-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 05:20:54 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.55s
% Output   : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : SET822-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.11/0.12  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 10:43:19 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.35  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.12/0.35  The process was started by sandbox2 on n014.cluster.edu,
% 0.12/0.35  Mon Jul 11 10:43:19 2022
% 0.12/0.35  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 20088.
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.12/0.35  set(auto).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.12/0.35  clear(print_given).
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  list(usable).
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=3.
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  This ia a non-Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 0.12/0.35  Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.12/0.35  unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.12/0.35  clauses in usable.
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  ------------> process usable:
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  ------------> process sos:
% 0.12/0.35    Following clause subsumed by 7 during input processing: 0 [copy,7,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.12/0.38  
% 0.12/0.38  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.12/0.38  
% 0.12/0.38  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.12/0.38  
% 0.12/0.38  
% 0.12/0.38  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.12/0.38  
% 0.12/0.38  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.12/0.38  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.12/0.38  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.12/0.38  number of clauses in intial UL: 4
% 0.12/0.38  number of clauses initially in problem: 7
% 0.12/0.38  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 57
% 0.12/0.38  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 88
% 0.12/0.38  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.12/0.38  absolute distinct symbol count: 9
% 0.12/0.38     distinct predicate count: 3
% 0.12/0.38     distinct function count: 3
% 0.12/0.38     distinct constant count: 3
% 0.12/0.38  
% 0.12/0.38  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.12/0.38  
% 0.12/0.38  
% 0.12/0.38  
% 0.12/0.38  =========== start of search ===========
% 0.19/0.55  
% 0.19/0.55  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 0.19/0.55  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.19/0.55  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.19/0.56  
% 0.19/0.56  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.19/0.56  
% 0.19/0.56  Model 2 [ 10 0 1397 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.56  
% 0.19/0.56  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   0.18 sec ----> 40 [binary,39.1,1.1] {-} $F.
% 0.19/0.56  
% 0.19/0.56  Length of proof is 4.  Level of proof is 4.
% 0.19/0.56  
% 0.19/0.56  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 0.19/0.56  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.19/0.56  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.19/0.56  
% 0.19/0.56  1 [] {+} -c_in(A,c_emptyset,B).
% 0.19/0.56  2 [] {+} -c_in(A,c_insert(B,C,D),D)|c_in(A,C,D)|A=B.
% 0.19/0.56  3 [] {+} -c_in(v_f(A),B,tc_IntDef_Oint)|c_in(v_x(A,B),B,tc_IntDef_Oint).
% 0.19/0.56  4 [] {+} -c_in(v_f(A),B,tc_IntDef_Oint)| -v_P(v_x(A,B)).
% 0.19/0.56  5 [] {-} c_in(A,c_insert(A,B,C),C).
% 0.19/0.56  6 [] {+} v_P(v_f(v_b)).
% 0.19/0.56  8 [hyper,5,3] {-} c_in(v_x(A,c_insert(v_f(A),B,tc_IntDef_Oint)),c_insert(v_f(A),B,tc_IntDef_Oint),tc_IntDef_Oint).
% 0.19/0.56  12 [hyper,8,2] {-} c_in(v_x(A,c_insert(v_f(A),B,tc_IntDef_Oint)),B,tc_IntDef_Oint)|v_x(A,c_insert(v_f(A),B,tc_IntDef_Oint))=v_f(A).
% 0.19/0.56  31 [para_from,12.2.1,4.2.1,unit_del,5] {-} -v_P(v_f(A))|c_in(v_x(A,c_insert(v_f(A),B,tc_IntDef_Oint)),B,tc_IntDef_Oint).
% 0.19/0.56  39 [hyper,31,6] {-} c_in(v_x(v_b,c_insert(v_f(v_b),A,tc_IntDef_Oint)),A,tc_IntDef_Oint).
% 0.19/0.56  40 [binary,39.1,1.1] {-} $F.
% 0.19/0.56  
% 0.19/0.56  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.19/0.56  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 0.19/0.56  
% 0.19/0.56  
% 0.19/0.56  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.19/0.56  
% 0.19/0.56  
% 0.19/0.56  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.19/0.56  
% 0.19/0.56  ============ end of search ============
% 0.19/0.56  
% 0.19/0.56  ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 0.19/0.56  
% 0.19/0.56  true clauses given           1      (14.3%)
% 0.19/0.56  false clauses given          6
% 0.19/0.56  
% 0.19/0.56        FALSE     TRUE
% 0.19/0.56    14  0         1
% 0.19/0.56    15  0         1
% 0.19/0.56    25  3         0
% 0.19/0.56    26  2         0
% 0.19/0.56    27  0         1
% 0.19/0.56    28  1         1
% 0.19/0.56    29  2         0
% 0.19/0.56    31  4         1
% 0.19/0.56    32  2         0
% 0.19/0.56    35  5         0
% 0.19/0.56    37  2         1
% 0.19/0.56  tot:  21        6      (22.2% true)
% 0.19/0.56  
% 0.19/0.56  
% 0.19/0.56  Model 2 [ 10 0 1397 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.56  
% 0.19/0.56  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 0.19/0.56  
% 0.19/0.56  Process 20088 finished Mon Jul 11 10:43:19 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------