TSTP Solution File: SET807+4 by ET---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : SET807+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 00:54:29 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.25s 1.43s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.25s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   13
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   37 (   8 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  135 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   46 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  140 (  42   ~;  69   |;  21   &)
%                                         (   4 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   25 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   76 (   9 sgn  36   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(subset,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( subset(X1,X2)
    <=> ! [X3] :
          ( member(X3,X1)
         => member(X3,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET006+0.ax',subset) ).

fof(power_set,axiom,
    ! [X3,X1] :
      ( member(X3,power_set(X1))
    <=> subset(X3,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET006+0.ax',power_set) ).

fof(rel_subset,hypothesis,
    ! [X3,X5] :
      ( apply(subset_predicate,X3,X5)
    <=> subset(X3,X5) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',rel_subset) ).

fof(pre_order,axiom,
    ! [X7,X4] :
      ( pre_order(X7,X4)
    <=> ( ! [X3] :
            ( member(X3,X4)
           => apply(X7,X3,X3) )
        & ! [X3,X5,X6] :
            ( ( member(X3,X4)
              & member(X5,X4)
              & member(X6,X4) )
           => ( ( apply(X7,X3,X5)
                & apply(X7,X5,X6) )
             => apply(X7,X3,X6) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET006+2.ax',pre_order) ).

fof(thIV18a,conjecture,
    ! [X4] : pre_order(subset_predicate,power_set(X4)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',thIV18a) ).

fof(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X4,X5,X6,X4,X5] :
      ( ( ~ subset(X4,X5)
        | ~ member(X6,X4)
        | member(X6,X5) )
      & ( member(esk2_2(X4,X5),X4)
        | subset(X4,X5) )
      & ( ~ member(esk2_2(X4,X5),X5)
        | subset(X4,X5) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[subset])])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X4,X5,X4,X5] :
      ( ( ~ member(X4,power_set(X5))
        | subset(X4,X5) )
      & ( ~ subset(X4,X5)
        | member(X4,power_set(X5)) ) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[power_set])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_7,hypothesis,
    ! [X6,X7,X6,X7] :
      ( ( ~ apply(subset_predicate,X6,X7)
        | subset(X6,X7) )
      & ( ~ subset(X6,X7)
        | apply(subset_predicate,X6,X7) ) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[rel_subset])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    ( subset(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(esk2_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    ( subset(X1,X2)
    | member(esk2_2(X1,X2),X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( member(X1,power_set(X2))
    | ~ subset(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,hypothesis,
    ( subset(X1,X2)
    | ~ apply(subset_predicate,X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

fof(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X8,X9,X10,X11,X12,X13,X8,X9] :
      ( ( ~ member(X10,X9)
        | apply(X8,X10,X10)
        | ~ pre_order(X8,X9) )
      & ( ~ member(X11,X9)
        | ~ member(X12,X9)
        | ~ member(X13,X9)
        | ~ apply(X8,X11,X12)
        | ~ apply(X8,X12,X13)
        | apply(X8,X11,X13)
        | ~ pre_order(X8,X9) )
      & ( member(esk4_2(X8,X9),X9)
        | member(esk3_2(X8,X9),X9)
        | pre_order(X8,X9) )
      & ( member(esk5_2(X8,X9),X9)
        | member(esk3_2(X8,X9),X9)
        | pre_order(X8,X9) )
      & ( member(esk6_2(X8,X9),X9)
        | member(esk3_2(X8,X9),X9)
        | pre_order(X8,X9) )
      & ( apply(X8,esk4_2(X8,X9),esk5_2(X8,X9))
        | member(esk3_2(X8,X9),X9)
        | pre_order(X8,X9) )
      & ( apply(X8,esk5_2(X8,X9),esk6_2(X8,X9))
        | member(esk3_2(X8,X9),X9)
        | pre_order(X8,X9) )
      & ( ~ apply(X8,esk4_2(X8,X9),esk6_2(X8,X9))
        | member(esk3_2(X8,X9),X9)
        | pre_order(X8,X9) )
      & ( member(esk4_2(X8,X9),X9)
        | ~ apply(X8,esk3_2(X8,X9),esk3_2(X8,X9))
        | pre_order(X8,X9) )
      & ( member(esk5_2(X8,X9),X9)
        | ~ apply(X8,esk3_2(X8,X9),esk3_2(X8,X9))
        | pre_order(X8,X9) )
      & ( member(esk6_2(X8,X9),X9)
        | ~ apply(X8,esk3_2(X8,X9),esk3_2(X8,X9))
        | pre_order(X8,X9) )
      & ( apply(X8,esk4_2(X8,X9),esk5_2(X8,X9))
        | ~ apply(X8,esk3_2(X8,X9),esk3_2(X8,X9))
        | pre_order(X8,X9) )
      & ( apply(X8,esk5_2(X8,X9),esk6_2(X8,X9))
        | ~ apply(X8,esk3_2(X8,X9),esk3_2(X8,X9))
        | pre_order(X8,X9) )
      & ( ~ apply(X8,esk4_2(X8,X9),esk6_2(X8,X9))
        | ~ apply(X8,esk3_2(X8,X9),esk3_2(X8,X9))
        | pre_order(X8,X9) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[pre_order])])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,hypothesis,
    ( apply(subset_predicate,X1,X2)
    | ~ subset(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    subset(X1,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,hypothesis,
    ( member(X1,power_set(X2))
    | ~ apply(subset_predicate,X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( pre_order(X1,X2)
    | apply(X1,esk5_2(X1,X2),esk6_2(X1,X2))
    | ~ apply(X1,esk3_2(X1,X2),esk3_2(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,hypothesis,
    apply(subset_predicate,X1,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( subset(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X1,power_set(X2)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,hypothesis,
    ( pre_order(subset_predicate,X1)
    | member(esk5_2(subset_predicate,X1),power_set(esk6_2(subset_predicate,X1))) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),c_0_17])]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( pre_order(X1,X2)
    | apply(X1,esk4_2(X1,X2),esk5_2(X1,X2))
    | ~ apply(X1,esk3_2(X1,X2),esk3_2(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( member(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X1,X3)
    | ~ subset(X3,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,hypothesis,
    ( pre_order(subset_predicate,X1)
    | subset(esk5_2(subset_predicate,X1),esk6_2(subset_predicate,X1)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,hypothesis,
    ( pre_order(subset_predicate,X1)
    | member(esk4_2(subset_predicate,X1),power_set(esk5_2(subset_predicate,X1))) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_20]),c_0_17])]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,hypothesis,
    ( pre_order(subset_predicate,X1)
    | member(X2,esk6_2(subset_predicate,X1))
    | ~ member(X2,esk5_2(subset_predicate,X1)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,hypothesis,
    ( pre_order(subset_predicate,X1)
    | subset(esk4_2(subset_predicate,X1),esk5_2(subset_predicate,X1)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,hypothesis,
    ( pre_order(subset_predicate,X1)
    | subset(X2,esk6_2(subset_predicate,X1))
    | ~ member(esk2_2(X2,esk6_2(subset_predicate,X1)),esk5_2(subset_predicate,X1)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,hypothesis,
    ( pre_order(subset_predicate,X1)
    | member(X2,esk5_2(subset_predicate,X1))
    | ~ member(X2,esk4_2(subset_predicate,X1)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,hypothesis,
    ( pre_order(subset_predicate,X1)
    | subset(X2,esk6_2(subset_predicate,X1))
    | ~ member(esk2_2(X2,esk6_2(subset_predicate,X1)),esk4_2(subset_predicate,X1)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]) ).

fof(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X4] : pre_order(subset_predicate,power_set(X4)),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[thIV18a]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,hypothesis,
    ( pre_order(subset_predicate,X1)
    | subset(esk4_2(subset_predicate,X1),esk6_2(subset_predicate,X1)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_9]) ).

fof(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
    ~ pre_order(subset_predicate,power_set(esk1_0)),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_29])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    ( pre_order(X1,X2)
    | ~ apply(X1,esk3_2(X1,X2),esk3_2(X1,X2))
    | ~ apply(X1,esk4_2(X1,X2),esk6_2(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,hypothesis,
    ( pre_order(subset_predicate,X1)
    | apply(subset_predicate,esk4_2(subset_predicate,X1),esk6_2(subset_predicate,X1)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
    ~ pre_order(subset_predicate,power_set(esk1_0)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,hypothesis,
    pre_order(subset_predicate,X1),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]),c_0_17])]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13  % Problem  : SET807+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 11:11:57 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.25/1.43  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.25/1.43  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.25/1.43  # Preprocessing time       : 0.016 s
% 0.25/1.43  
% 0.25/1.43  # Proof found!
% 0.25/1.43  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.25/1.43  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.25/1.43  # Proof object total steps             : 37
% 0.25/1.43  # Proof object clause steps            : 26
% 0.25/1.43  # Proof object formula steps           : 11
% 0.25/1.43  # Proof object conjectures             : 5
% 0.25/1.43  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 2
% 0.25/1.43  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 0.25/1.43  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 11
% 0.25/1.43  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 5
% 0.25/1.43  # Proof object generating inferences   : 14
% 0.25/1.43  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 8
% 0.25/1.43  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.25/1.43  # Parsed axioms                        : 18
% 0.25/1.43  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 13
% 0.25/1.43  # Initial clauses                      : 22
% 0.25/1.43  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.25/1.43  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 22
% 0.25/1.43  # Processed clauses                    : 78
% 0.25/1.43  # ...of these trivial                  : 1
% 0.25/1.43  # ...subsumed                          : 19
% 0.25/1.43  # ...remaining for further processing  : 58
% 0.25/1.43  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.25/1.43  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.25/1.43  # Backward-subsumed                    : 2
% 0.25/1.43  # Backward-rewritten                   : 15
% 0.25/1.43  # Generated clauses                    : 117
% 0.25/1.43  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 107
% 0.25/1.43  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 3
% 0.25/1.43  # Paramodulations                      : 117
% 0.25/1.43  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.25/1.43  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.25/1.43  # Current number of processed clauses  : 41
% 0.25/1.43  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 4
% 0.25/1.43  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.25/1.43  #    Negative unit clauses             : 0
% 0.25/1.43  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 37
% 0.25/1.43  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 35
% 0.25/1.43  # ...number of literals in the above   : 157
% 0.25/1.43  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.25/1.43  # Current number of archived clauses   : 17
% 0.25/1.43  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 388
% 0.25/1.43  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 226
% 0.25/1.43  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 24
% 0.25/1.43  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 51
% 0.25/1.43  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.25/1.43  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 7
% 0.25/1.43  # BW rewrite match successes           : 2
% 0.25/1.43  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.25/1.43  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.25/1.43  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 3959
% 0.25/1.43  
% 0.25/1.43  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.25/1.43  # User time                : 0.018 s
% 0.25/1.43  # System time              : 0.004 s
% 0.25/1.43  # Total time               : 0.022 s
% 0.25/1.43  # Maximum resident set size: 2996 pages
% 0.25/23.42  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.25/23.43  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.25/23.44  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.44  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.45  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.45  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.45  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.45  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.45  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.45  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.45  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.45  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.46  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.46  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.46  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.46  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.46  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.46  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.46  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.46  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.47  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.47  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.47  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.47  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.47  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.47  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.48  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.48  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.48  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.48  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.48  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.48  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.48  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.48  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.49  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.49  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.49  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.49  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.49  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.49  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.50  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.50  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.50  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.50  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.50  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.50  eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------