TSTP Solution File: SET804+4 by SPASS---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : SET804+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 05:28:46 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.39s 0.59s
% Output   : Refutation 0.39s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   21 (  11 unt;   0 nHn;  21 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   37 (   0 equ;  20 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   5 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   9 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(2,axiom,
    min(skc8,skc5,skc6),
    file('SET804+4.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(3,axiom,
    ~ equal(skc8,skc7),
    file('SET804+4.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(4,axiom,
    min(skc7,skc5,skc6),
    file('SET804+4.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(5,axiom,
    least(skc9,skc5,skc6),
    file('SET804+4.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(13,axiom,
    ( ~ least(u,v,w)
    | member(u,w) ),
    file('SET804+4.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(15,axiom,
    ( ~ min(u,v,w)
    | member(u,w) ),
    file('SET804+4.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(34,axiom,
    ( ~ member(u,v)
    | ~ least(w,x,v)
    | apply(x,w,u) ),
    file('SET804+4.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(51,axiom,
    ( ~ member(u,v)
    | ~ min(w,x,v)
    | ~ apply(x,u,w)
    | equal(w,u) ),
    file('SET804+4.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(73,plain,
    member(skc9,skc6),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[5,13]),
    [iquote('0:Res:5.0,13.0')] ).

cnf(74,plain,
    ( ~ member(u,skc6)
    | apply(skc5,skc9,u) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[5,34]),
    [iquote('0:Res:5.0,34.1')] ).

cnf(75,plain,
    member(skc7,skc6),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[4,15]),
    [iquote('0:Res:4.0,15.0')] ).

cnf(76,plain,
    ( ~ member(u,skc6)
    | ~ apply(skc5,u,skc7)
    | equal(skc7,u) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[4,51]),
    [iquote('0:Res:4.0,51.2')] ).

cnf(83,plain,
    member(skc8,skc6),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[2,15]),
    [iquote('0:Res:2.0,15.0')] ).

cnf(84,plain,
    ( ~ member(u,skc6)
    | ~ apply(skc5,u,skc8)
    | equal(skc8,u) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[2,51]),
    [iquote('0:Res:2.0,51.2')] ).

cnf(87,plain,
    ( ~ member(skc8,skc6)
    | ~ apply(skc5,skc8,skc7) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[76,3]),
    [iquote('0:Res:76.2,3.0')] ).

cnf(90,plain,
    ~ apply(skc5,skc8,skc7),
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[87,83]),
    [iquote('0:MRR:87.0,83.0')] ).

cnf(96,plain,
    ( ~ member(skc8,skc6)
    | ~ member(skc9,skc6)
    | equal(skc9,skc8) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[74,84]),
    [iquote('0:Res:74.1,84.1')] ).

cnf(97,plain,
    equal(skc9,skc8),
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[96,83,73]),
    [iquote('0:MRR:96.0,96.1,83.0,73.0')] ).

cnf(100,plain,
    ( ~ member(u,skc6)
    | apply(skc5,skc8,u) ),
    inference(rew,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[97,74]),
    [iquote('0:Rew:97.0,74.1')] ).

cnf(104,plain,
    ~ member(skc7,skc6),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[100,90]),
    [iquote('0:Res:100.1,90.0')] ).

cnf(105,plain,
    $false,
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[104,75]),
    [iquote('0:MRR:104.0,75.0')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : SET804+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Sun Jul 10 12:47:15 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.39/0.59  
% 0.39/0.59  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.39/0.59  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.39/0.59  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.39/0.59  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.39/0.59  SPASS derived 36 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 1 splits and kept 90 clauses.
% 0.39/0.59  SPASS allocated 88105 KBytes.
% 0.39/0.59  SPASS spent	0:00:00.24 on the problem.
% 0.39/0.59  		0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 0.39/0.59  		0:00:00.18 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.39/0.59  		0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.39/0.59  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.39/0.59  		0:00:00.00 for the reduction.
% 0.39/0.59  
% 0.39/0.59  
% 0.39/0.59  Here is a proof with depth 3, length 21 :
% 0.39/0.59  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.39/0.59  Formulae used in the proof : thIV16 least min
% 0.39/0.59  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------