TSTP Solution File: SET802+4 by ET---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : SET802+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 00:54:27 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.22s 1.40s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.22s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   34 (   5 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  131 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   20 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  152 (  55   ~;  65   |;  20   &)
%                                         (   5 <=>;   7  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   19 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    8 (   7 usr;   1 prp; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   4 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   93 (  13 sgn  44   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(thIV14,conjecture,
    ! [X6,X4] :
      ( order(X6,X4)
     => ! [X3] :
          ( subset(X3,X4)
         => ! [X8] :
              ( least(X8,X6,X3)
            <=> ( member(X8,X3)
                & greatest_lower_bound(X8,X3,X6,X4) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',thIV14) ).

fof(least,axiom,
    ! [X6,X4,X8] :
      ( least(X8,X6,X4)
    <=> ( member(X8,X4)
        & ! [X3] :
            ( member(X3,X4)
           => apply(X6,X8,X3) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET006+3.ax',least) ).

fof(lower_bound,axiom,
    ! [X6,X4,X8] :
      ( lower_bound(X8,X6,X4)
    <=> ! [X3] :
          ( member(X3,X4)
         => apply(X6,X8,X3) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET006+3.ax',lower_bound) ).

fof(greatest_lower_bound,axiom,
    ! [X1,X3,X6,X4] :
      ( greatest_lower_bound(X1,X3,X6,X4)
    <=> ( member(X1,X3)
        & lower_bound(X1,X6,X3)
        & ! [X8] :
            ( ( member(X8,X4)
              & lower_bound(X8,X6,X3) )
           => apply(X6,X8,X1) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET006+3.ax',greatest_lower_bound) ).

fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X6,X4] :
        ( order(X6,X4)
       => ! [X3] :
            ( subset(X3,X4)
           => ! [X8] :
                ( least(X8,X6,X3)
              <=> ( member(X8,X3)
                  & greatest_lower_bound(X8,X3,X6,X4) ) ) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[thIV14]) ).

fof(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X9,X10,X11,X12,X9,X10,X11] :
      ( ( member(X11,X10)
        | ~ least(X11,X9,X10) )
      & ( ~ member(X12,X10)
        | apply(X9,X11,X12)
        | ~ least(X11,X9,X10) )
      & ( member(esk6_3(X9,X10,X11),X10)
        | ~ member(X11,X10)
        | least(X11,X9,X10) )
      & ( ~ apply(X9,X11,esk6_3(X9,X10,X11))
        | ~ member(X11,X10)
        | least(X11,X9,X10) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[least])])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ( order(esk1_0,esk2_0)
    & subset(esk3_0,esk2_0)
    & ( ~ least(esk4_0,esk1_0,esk3_0)
      | ~ member(esk4_0,esk3_0)
      | ~ greatest_lower_bound(esk4_0,esk3_0,esk1_0,esk2_0) )
    & ( member(esk4_0,esk3_0)
      | least(esk4_0,esk1_0,esk3_0) )
    & ( greatest_lower_bound(esk4_0,esk3_0,esk1_0,esk2_0)
      | least(esk4_0,esk1_0,esk3_0) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,plain,
    ( apply(X2,X1,X4)
    | ~ least(X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ member(X4,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ( least(esk4_0,esk1_0,esk3_0)
    | greatest_lower_bound(esk4_0,esk3_0,esk1_0,esk2_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X9,X10,X11,X12,X9,X10,X11] :
      ( ( ~ lower_bound(X11,X9,X10)
        | ~ member(X12,X10)
        | apply(X9,X11,X12) )
      & ( member(esk8_3(X9,X10,X11),X10)
        | lower_bound(X11,X9,X10) )
      & ( ~ apply(X9,X11,esk8_3(X9,X10,X11))
        | lower_bound(X11,X9,X10) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[lower_bound])])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ( greatest_lower_bound(esk4_0,esk3_0,esk1_0,esk2_0)
    | apply(esk1_0,esk4_0,X1)
    | ~ member(X1,esk3_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( lower_bound(X1,X2,X3)
    | member(esk8_3(X2,X3,X1),X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

fof(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X9,X10,X11,X12,X13,X9,X10,X11,X12] :
      ( ( member(X9,X10)
        | ~ greatest_lower_bound(X9,X10,X11,X12) )
      & ( lower_bound(X9,X11,X10)
        | ~ greatest_lower_bound(X9,X10,X11,X12) )
      & ( ~ member(X13,X12)
        | ~ lower_bound(X13,X11,X10)
        | apply(X11,X13,X9)
        | ~ greatest_lower_bound(X9,X10,X11,X12) )
      & ( member(esk5_4(X9,X10,X11,X12),X12)
        | ~ member(X9,X10)
        | ~ lower_bound(X9,X11,X10)
        | greatest_lower_bound(X9,X10,X11,X12) )
      & ( lower_bound(esk5_4(X9,X10,X11,X12),X11,X10)
        | ~ member(X9,X10)
        | ~ lower_bound(X9,X11,X10)
        | greatest_lower_bound(X9,X10,X11,X12) )
      & ( ~ apply(X11,esk5_4(X9,X10,X11,X12),X9)
        | ~ member(X9,X10)
        | ~ lower_bound(X9,X11,X10)
        | greatest_lower_bound(X9,X10,X11,X12) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[greatest_lower_bound])])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( lower_bound(X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ apply(X2,X1,esk8_3(X2,X3,X1)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    ( greatest_lower_bound(esk4_0,esk3_0,esk1_0,esk2_0)
    | lower_bound(X1,X2,esk3_0)
    | apply(esk1_0,esk4_0,esk8_3(X2,esk3_0,X1)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( lower_bound(X1,X3,X2)
    | ~ greatest_lower_bound(X1,X2,X3,X4) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( apply(X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ member(X3,X4)
    | ~ lower_bound(X2,X1,X4) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    lower_bound(esk4_0,esk1_0,esk3_0),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( member(X1,X3)
    | ~ least(X1,X2,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    ( least(esk4_0,esk1_0,esk3_0)
    | member(esk4_0,esk3_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( least(X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ member(X1,X3)
    | ~ apply(X2,X1,esk6_3(X2,X3,X1)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    ( apply(esk1_0,esk4_0,X1)
    | ~ member(X1,esk3_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ greatest_lower_bound(esk4_0,esk3_0,esk1_0,esk2_0)
    | ~ member(esk4_0,esk3_0)
    | ~ least(esk4_0,esk1_0,esk3_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    member(esk4_0,esk3_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    ( least(esk4_0,esk1_0,X1)
    | ~ member(esk6_3(esk1_0,X1,esk4_0),esk3_0)
    | ~ member(esk4_0,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( least(X1,X2,X3)
    | member(esk6_3(X2,X3,X1),X3)
    | ~ member(X1,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    ( greatest_lower_bound(X1,X2,X3,X4)
    | lower_bound(esk5_4(X1,X2,X3,X4),X3,X2)
    | ~ lower_bound(X1,X3,X2)
    | ~ member(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ greatest_lower_bound(esk4_0,esk3_0,esk1_0,esk2_0)
    | ~ least(esk4_0,esk1_0,esk3_0) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23])]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    least(esk4_0,esk1_0,esk3_0),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]),c_0_23])]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    ( greatest_lower_bound(X1,X2,X3,X4)
    | ~ lower_bound(X1,X3,X2)
    | ~ member(X1,X2)
    | ~ apply(X3,esk5_4(X1,X2,X3,X4),X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    ( greatest_lower_bound(X1,X2,X3,X4)
    | apply(X3,esk5_4(X1,X2,X3,X4),X5)
    | ~ lower_bound(X1,X3,X2)
    | ~ member(X5,X2)
    | ~ member(X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
    ~ greatest_lower_bound(esk4_0,esk3_0,esk1_0,esk2_0),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28])]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    ( greatest_lower_bound(X1,X2,X3,X4)
    | ~ lower_bound(X1,X3,X2)
    | ~ member(X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]),c_0_17]),c_0_23])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11  % Problem  : SET802+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.03/0.12  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 09:04:45 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.22/1.40  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.22/1.40  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.22/1.40  # Preprocessing time       : 0.019 s
% 0.22/1.40  
% 0.22/1.40  # Proof found!
% 0.22/1.40  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.22/1.40  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.22/1.40  # Proof object total steps             : 34
% 0.22/1.40  # Proof object clause steps            : 25
% 0.22/1.40  # Proof object formula steps           : 9
% 0.22/1.40  # Proof object conjectures             : 16
% 0.22/1.40  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 13
% 0.22/1.40  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 0.22/1.40  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 13
% 0.22/1.40  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 4
% 0.22/1.40  # Proof object generating inferences   : 10
% 0.22/1.40  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 10
% 0.22/1.40  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.22/1.40  # Parsed axioms                        : 22
% 0.22/1.40  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 16
% 0.22/1.40  # Initial clauses                      : 86
% 0.22/1.40  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.22/1.40  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 86
% 0.22/1.40  # Processed clauses                    : 115
% 0.22/1.40  # ...of these trivial                  : 1
% 0.22/1.40  # ...subsumed                          : 1
% 0.22/1.40  # ...remaining for further processing  : 113
% 0.22/1.40  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.22/1.40  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.22/1.40  # Backward-subsumed                    : 6
% 0.22/1.40  # Backward-rewritten                   : 6
% 0.22/1.40  # Generated clauses                    : 191
% 0.22/1.40  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 179
% 0.22/1.40  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 3
% 0.22/1.40  # Paramodulations                      : 189
% 0.22/1.40  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.22/1.40  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.22/1.40  # Current number of processed clauses  : 99
% 0.22/1.40  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 9
% 0.22/1.40  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.22/1.40  #    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.22/1.40  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 89
% 0.22/1.40  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 73
% 0.22/1.40  # ...number of literals in the above   : 471
% 0.22/1.40  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.22/1.40  # Current number of archived clauses   : 14
% 0.22/1.40  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2334
% 0.22/1.40  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1049
% 0.22/1.40  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 9
% 0.22/1.40  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 47
% 0.22/1.40  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.22/1.40  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 8
% 0.22/1.40  # BW rewrite match successes           : 3
% 0.22/1.40  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.22/1.40  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.22/1.40  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 9017
% 0.22/1.40  
% 0.22/1.40  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/1.40  # User time                : 0.028 s
% 0.22/1.40  # System time              : 0.003 s
% 0.22/1.40  # Total time               : 0.031 s
% 0.22/1.40  # Maximum resident set size: 3444 pages
% 0.22/23.42  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.22/23.44  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.44  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.44  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.44  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.44  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.44  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.45  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.45  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.45  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.45  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.45  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.45  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.46  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.46  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.46  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.46  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.46  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.46  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.47  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.47  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.47  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.47  eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------