TSTP Solution File: SET801+4 by ET---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : SET801+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 00:54:27 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.25s 1.45s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.25s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   34 (   5 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  131 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   20 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  152 (  55   ~;  65   |;  20   &)
%                                         (   5 <=>;   7  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   19 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    8 (   7 usr;   1 prp; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   4 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   93 (  13 sgn  44   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(thIV13,conjecture,
    ! [X6,X4] :
      ( order(X6,X4)
     => ! [X3] :
          ( subset(X3,X4)
         => ! [X8] :
              ( greatest(X8,X6,X3)
            <=> ( member(X8,X3)
                & least_upper_bound(X8,X3,X6,X4) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',thIV13) ).

fof(greatest,axiom,
    ! [X6,X4,X8] :
      ( greatest(X8,X6,X4)
    <=> ( member(X8,X4)
        & ! [X3] :
            ( member(X3,X4)
           => apply(X6,X3,X8) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET006+3.ax',greatest) ).

fof(upper_bound,axiom,
    ! [X6,X4,X8] :
      ( upper_bound(X8,X6,X4)
    <=> ! [X3] :
          ( member(X3,X4)
         => apply(X6,X3,X8) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET006+3.ax',upper_bound) ).

fof(least_upper_bound,axiom,
    ! [X1,X3,X6,X4] :
      ( least_upper_bound(X1,X3,X6,X4)
    <=> ( member(X1,X3)
        & upper_bound(X1,X6,X3)
        & ! [X8] :
            ( ( member(X8,X4)
              & upper_bound(X8,X6,X3) )
           => apply(X6,X1,X8) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET006+3.ax',least_upper_bound) ).

fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X6,X4] :
        ( order(X6,X4)
       => ! [X3] :
            ( subset(X3,X4)
           => ! [X8] :
                ( greatest(X8,X6,X3)
              <=> ( member(X8,X3)
                  & least_upper_bound(X8,X3,X6,X4) ) ) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[thIV13]) ).

fof(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X9,X10,X11,X12,X9,X10,X11] :
      ( ( member(X11,X10)
        | ~ greatest(X11,X9,X10) )
      & ( ~ member(X12,X10)
        | apply(X9,X12,X11)
        | ~ greatest(X11,X9,X10) )
      & ( member(esk6_3(X9,X10,X11),X10)
        | ~ member(X11,X10)
        | greatest(X11,X9,X10) )
      & ( ~ apply(X9,esk6_3(X9,X10,X11),X11)
        | ~ member(X11,X10)
        | greatest(X11,X9,X10) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[greatest])])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ( order(esk1_0,esk2_0)
    & subset(esk3_0,esk2_0)
    & ( ~ greatest(esk4_0,esk1_0,esk3_0)
      | ~ member(esk4_0,esk3_0)
      | ~ least_upper_bound(esk4_0,esk3_0,esk1_0,esk2_0) )
    & ( member(esk4_0,esk3_0)
      | greatest(esk4_0,esk1_0,esk3_0) )
    & ( least_upper_bound(esk4_0,esk3_0,esk1_0,esk2_0)
      | greatest(esk4_0,esk1_0,esk3_0) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,plain,
    ( apply(X2,X4,X1)
    | ~ greatest(X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ member(X4,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ( greatest(esk4_0,esk1_0,esk3_0)
    | least_upper_bound(esk4_0,esk3_0,esk1_0,esk2_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X9,X10,X11,X12,X9,X10,X11] :
      ( ( ~ upper_bound(X11,X9,X10)
        | ~ member(X12,X10)
        | apply(X9,X12,X11) )
      & ( member(esk8_3(X9,X10,X11),X10)
        | upper_bound(X11,X9,X10) )
      & ( ~ apply(X9,esk8_3(X9,X10,X11),X11)
        | upper_bound(X11,X9,X10) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[upper_bound])])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ( least_upper_bound(esk4_0,esk3_0,esk1_0,esk2_0)
    | apply(esk1_0,X1,esk4_0)
    | ~ member(X1,esk3_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( upper_bound(X1,X2,X3)
    | member(esk8_3(X2,X3,X1),X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

fof(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X9,X10,X11,X12,X13,X9,X10,X11,X12] :
      ( ( member(X9,X10)
        | ~ least_upper_bound(X9,X10,X11,X12) )
      & ( upper_bound(X9,X11,X10)
        | ~ least_upper_bound(X9,X10,X11,X12) )
      & ( ~ member(X13,X12)
        | ~ upper_bound(X13,X11,X10)
        | apply(X11,X9,X13)
        | ~ least_upper_bound(X9,X10,X11,X12) )
      & ( member(esk5_4(X9,X10,X11,X12),X12)
        | ~ member(X9,X10)
        | ~ upper_bound(X9,X11,X10)
        | least_upper_bound(X9,X10,X11,X12) )
      & ( upper_bound(esk5_4(X9,X10,X11,X12),X11,X10)
        | ~ member(X9,X10)
        | ~ upper_bound(X9,X11,X10)
        | least_upper_bound(X9,X10,X11,X12) )
      & ( ~ apply(X11,X9,esk5_4(X9,X10,X11,X12))
        | ~ member(X9,X10)
        | ~ upper_bound(X9,X11,X10)
        | least_upper_bound(X9,X10,X11,X12) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[least_upper_bound])])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( upper_bound(X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ apply(X2,esk8_3(X2,X3,X1),X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    ( least_upper_bound(esk4_0,esk3_0,esk1_0,esk2_0)
    | upper_bound(X1,X2,esk3_0)
    | apply(esk1_0,esk8_3(X2,esk3_0,X1),esk4_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( upper_bound(X1,X3,X2)
    | ~ least_upper_bound(X1,X2,X3,X4) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( apply(X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ member(X2,X4)
    | ~ upper_bound(X3,X1,X4) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    upper_bound(esk4_0,esk1_0,esk3_0),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( member(X1,X3)
    | ~ greatest(X1,X2,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    ( greatest(esk4_0,esk1_0,esk3_0)
    | member(esk4_0,esk3_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( greatest(X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ member(X1,X3)
    | ~ apply(X2,esk6_3(X2,X3,X1),X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    ( apply(esk1_0,X1,esk4_0)
    | ~ member(X1,esk3_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ least_upper_bound(esk4_0,esk3_0,esk1_0,esk2_0)
    | ~ member(esk4_0,esk3_0)
    | ~ greatest(esk4_0,esk1_0,esk3_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    member(esk4_0,esk3_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    ( greatest(esk4_0,esk1_0,X1)
    | ~ member(esk6_3(esk1_0,X1,esk4_0),esk3_0)
    | ~ member(esk4_0,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( greatest(X1,X2,X3)
    | member(esk6_3(X2,X3,X1),X3)
    | ~ member(X1,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    ( least_upper_bound(X1,X2,X3,X4)
    | upper_bound(esk5_4(X1,X2,X3,X4),X3,X2)
    | ~ upper_bound(X1,X3,X2)
    | ~ member(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ least_upper_bound(esk4_0,esk3_0,esk1_0,esk2_0)
    | ~ greatest(esk4_0,esk1_0,esk3_0) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23])]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    greatest(esk4_0,esk1_0,esk3_0),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]),c_0_23])]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    ( least_upper_bound(X1,X2,X3,X4)
    | ~ upper_bound(X1,X3,X2)
    | ~ member(X1,X2)
    | ~ apply(X3,X1,esk5_4(X1,X2,X3,X4)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    ( least_upper_bound(X1,X2,X3,X4)
    | apply(X3,X5,esk5_4(X1,X2,X3,X4))
    | ~ upper_bound(X1,X3,X2)
    | ~ member(X5,X2)
    | ~ member(X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
    ~ least_upper_bound(esk4_0,esk3_0,esk1_0,esk2_0),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28])]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    ( least_upper_bound(X1,X2,X3,X4)
    | ~ upper_bound(X1,X3,X2)
    | ~ member(X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]),c_0_17]),c_0_23])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.14  % Problem  : SET801+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.08/0.14  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.14/0.36  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.36  % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 02:55:48 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.25/1.45  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.25/1.45  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.25/1.45  # Preprocessing time       : 0.020 s
% 0.25/1.45  
% 0.25/1.45  # Proof found!
% 0.25/1.45  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.25/1.45  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.25/1.45  # Proof object total steps             : 34
% 0.25/1.45  # Proof object clause steps            : 25
% 0.25/1.45  # Proof object formula steps           : 9
% 0.25/1.45  # Proof object conjectures             : 16
% 0.25/1.45  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 13
% 0.25/1.45  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 0.25/1.45  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 13
% 0.25/1.45  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 4
% 0.25/1.45  # Proof object generating inferences   : 10
% 0.25/1.45  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 10
% 0.25/1.45  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.25/1.45  # Parsed axioms                        : 22
% 0.25/1.45  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 16
% 0.25/1.45  # Initial clauses                      : 86
% 0.25/1.45  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.25/1.45  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 86
% 0.25/1.45  # Processed clauses                    : 115
% 0.25/1.45  # ...of these trivial                  : 1
% 0.25/1.45  # ...subsumed                          : 1
% 0.25/1.45  # ...remaining for further processing  : 113
% 0.25/1.45  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.25/1.45  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.25/1.45  # Backward-subsumed                    : 6
% 0.25/1.45  # Backward-rewritten                   : 6
% 0.25/1.45  # Generated clauses                    : 191
% 0.25/1.45  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 179
% 0.25/1.45  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 3
% 0.25/1.45  # Paramodulations                      : 189
% 0.25/1.45  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.25/1.45  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.25/1.45  # Current number of processed clauses  : 99
% 0.25/1.45  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 9
% 0.25/1.45  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.25/1.45  #    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.25/1.45  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 89
% 0.25/1.45  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 73
% 0.25/1.45  # ...number of literals in the above   : 471
% 0.25/1.45  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.25/1.45  # Current number of archived clauses   : 14
% 0.25/1.45  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2385
% 0.25/1.45  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 984
% 0.25/1.45  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 9
% 0.25/1.45  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 49
% 0.25/1.45  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.25/1.45  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 7
% 0.25/1.45  # BW rewrite match successes           : 3
% 0.25/1.45  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.25/1.45  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.25/1.45  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 9017
% 0.25/1.45  
% 0.25/1.45  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.25/1.45  # User time                : 0.030 s
% 0.25/1.45  # System time              : 0.003 s
% 0.25/1.45  # Total time               : 0.033 s
% 0.25/1.45  # Maximum resident set size: 3176 pages
% 0.25/23.44  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.25/23.46  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.46  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.46  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.46  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.47  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.47  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.47  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.47  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.48  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.48  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.48  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.48  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.49  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.49  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.50  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.50  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.50  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.50  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.51  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.51  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.51  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.51  eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------