TSTP Solution File: SET797+4 by Enigma---0.5.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : SET797+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 00:14:14 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 8.05s 2.53s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 8.05s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   19 (   7 unt;   4 nHn;  15 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   35 (   0 equ;  14 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   4 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   32 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_55,plain,
    ( member(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X1,X3)
    | ~ subset(X3,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-v0ynepcl/lgb.p',i_0_55) ).

cnf(i_0_61,negated_conjecture,
    subset(esk13_0,esk14_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-v0ynepcl/lgb.p',i_0_61) ).

cnf(i_0_79,plain,
    ( apply(X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ member(X2,X4)
    | ~ upper_bound(X3,X1,X4) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-v0ynepcl/lgb.p',i_0_79) ).

cnf(i_0_60,negated_conjecture,
    upper_bound(esk15_0,esk11_0,esk14_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-v0ynepcl/lgb.p',i_0_60) ).

cnf(i_0_78,plain,
    ( upper_bound(X1,X2,X3)
    | member(esk18_3(X2,X3,X1),X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-v0ynepcl/lgb.p',i_0_78) ).

cnf(i_0_77,plain,
    ( upper_bound(X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ apply(X2,esk18_3(X2,X3,X1),X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-v0ynepcl/lgb.p',i_0_77) ).

cnf(i_0_59,negated_conjecture,
    ~ upper_bound(esk15_0,esk11_0,esk13_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-v0ynepcl/lgb.p',i_0_59) ).

cnf(c_0_87,plain,
    ( member(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X1,X3)
    | ~ subset(X3,X2) ),
    i_0_55 ).

cnf(c_0_88,negated_conjecture,
    subset(esk13_0,esk14_0),
    i_0_61 ).

cnf(c_0_89,plain,
    ( apply(X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ member(X2,X4)
    | ~ upper_bound(X3,X1,X4) ),
    i_0_79 ).

cnf(c_0_90,negated_conjecture,
    upper_bound(esk15_0,esk11_0,esk14_0),
    i_0_60 ).

cnf(c_0_91,negated_conjecture,
    ( member(X1,esk14_0)
    | ~ member(X1,esk13_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_87,c_0_88]) ).

cnf(c_0_92,plain,
    ( upper_bound(X1,X2,X3)
    | member(esk18_3(X2,X3,X1),X3) ),
    i_0_78 ).

cnf(c_0_93,negated_conjecture,
    ( apply(esk11_0,X1,esk15_0)
    | ~ member(X1,esk14_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_89,c_0_90]) ).

cnf(c_0_94,plain,
    ( member(esk18_3(X1,esk13_0,X2),esk14_0)
    | upper_bound(X2,X1,esk13_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_91,c_0_92]) ).

cnf(c_0_95,plain,
    ( upper_bound(X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ apply(X2,esk18_3(X2,X3,X1),X1) ),
    i_0_77 ).

cnf(c_0_96,negated_conjecture,
    ( apply(esk11_0,esk18_3(X1,esk13_0,X2),esk15_0)
    | upper_bound(X2,X1,esk13_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_93,c_0_94]) ).

cnf(c_0_97,negated_conjecture,
    ~ upper_bound(esk15_0,esk11_0,esk13_0),
    i_0_59 ).

cnf(c_0_98,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_95,c_0_96]),c_0_97]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.14  % Problem  : SET797+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.03/0.14  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.15/0.36  % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.15/0.36  % DateTime : Sat Jul  9 23:23:57 EDT 2022
% 0.15/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.22/0.48  # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.22/0.49  # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/0.49  # Filter: axfilter_auto   0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   0.p
% 0.22/0.49  # Filter: axfilter_auto   1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   1.p
% 0.22/0.49  # Filter: axfilter_auto   2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   2.p
% 8.05/2.53  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 8.05/2.53  # No SInE strategy applied
% 8.05/2.53  # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 8.05/2.53  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___008_C18_F1_PI_SE_CS_SP_CO_S4S
% 8.05/2.53  # and selection function SelectNewComplexAHPNS.
% 8.05/2.53  #
% 8.05/2.53  # Preprocessing time       : 0.021 s
% 8.05/2.53  
% 8.05/2.53  # Proof found!
% 8.05/2.53  # SZS status Theorem
% 8.05/2.53  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 8.05/2.53  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 8.05/2.53  
% 8.05/2.53  # -------------------------------------------------
% 8.05/2.53  # User time                : 0.026 s
% 8.05/2.53  # System time              : 0.008 s
% 8.05/2.53  # Total time               : 0.034 s
% 8.05/2.53  # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 8.05/2.53  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------