TSTP Solution File: SET787-1 by SPASS---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : SET787-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 05:28:40 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.21s 0.54s
% Output   : Refutation 0.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   22 (  15 unt;   3 nHn;  22 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   30 (   0 equ;  10 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   11 (  11 usr;   7 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(1,axiom,
    ( ~ member(u,union(v))
    | member(u,unionE_sk1(u,v)) ),
    file('SET787-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(2,axiom,
    ( ~ member(u,union(v))
    | member(unionE_sk1(u,v),v) ),
    file('SET787-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(5,axiom,
    ( ~ member(u,cons(v,w))
    | member(u,w)
    | equal(u,v) ),
    file('SET787-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(6,axiom,
    ( ~ member(u,v)
    | member(u,un(v,w)) ),
    file('SET787-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(7,axiom,
    ( ~ member(u,v)
    | member(u,un(w,v)) ),
    file('SET787-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(8,axiom,
    ~ member(u,eptset),
    file('SET787-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(13,axiom,
    member(sk2,union(cons(a,cons(b,eptset)))),
    file('SET787-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(14,axiom,
    ~ member(sk2,un(a,b)),
    file('SET787-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(15,plain,
    ~ member(sk2,b),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[7,14]),
    [iquote('0:Res:7.1,14.0')] ).

cnf(16,plain,
    ~ member(sk2,a),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[6,14]),
    [iquote('0:Res:6.1,14.0')] ).

cnf(20,plain,
    member(sk2,unionE_sk1(sk2,cons(a,cons(b,eptset)))),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[13,1]),
    [iquote('0:Res:13.0,1.0')] ).

cnf(21,plain,
    member(unionE_sk1(sk2,cons(a,cons(b,eptset))),cons(a,cons(b,eptset))),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[13,2]),
    [iquote('0:Res:13.0,2.0')] ).

cnf(85,plain,
    ( member(unionE_sk1(sk2,cons(a,cons(b,eptset))),cons(b,eptset))
    | equal(unionE_sk1(sk2,cons(a,cons(b,eptset))),a) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[21,5]),
    [iquote('0:Res:21.0,5.0')] ).

cnf(745,plain,
    equal(unionE_sk1(sk2,cons(a,cons(b,eptset))),a),
    inference(spt,[spt(split,[position(s1)])],[85]),
    [iquote('1:Spt:85.1')] ).

cnf(746,plain,
    member(sk2,a),
    inference(rew,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[745,20]),
    [iquote('1:Rew:745.0,20.0')] ).

cnf(748,plain,
    $false,
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[746,16]),
    [iquote('1:MRR:746.0,16.0')] ).

cnf(749,plain,
    ~ equal(unionE_sk1(sk2,cons(a,cons(b,eptset))),a),
    inference(spt,[spt(split,[position(sa)])],[748,745]),
    [iquote('1:Spt:748.0,85.1,745.0')] ).

cnf(750,plain,
    member(unionE_sk1(sk2,cons(a,cons(b,eptset))),cons(b,eptset)),
    inference(spt,[spt(split,[position(s2)])],[85]),
    [iquote('1:Spt:748.0,85.0')] ).

cnf(751,plain,
    ( member(unionE_sk1(sk2,cons(a,cons(b,eptset))),eptset)
    | equal(unionE_sk1(sk2,cons(a,cons(b,eptset))),b) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[750,5]),
    [iquote('1:Res:750.0,5.0')] ).

cnf(752,plain,
    equal(unionE_sk1(sk2,cons(a,cons(b,eptset))),b),
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[751,8]),
    [iquote('1:MRR:751.0,8.0')] ).

cnf(754,plain,
    member(sk2,b),
    inference(rew,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[752,20]),
    [iquote('1:Rew:752.0,20.0')] ).

cnf(757,plain,
    $false,
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[754,15]),
    [iquote('1:MRR:754.0,15.0')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.13  % Problem  : SET787-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.7.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime : Sun Jul 10 02:57:25 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.21/0.54  
% 0.21/0.54  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.21/0.54  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.21/0.54  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.21/0.54  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.21/0.54  SPASS derived 665 clauses, backtracked 4 clauses, performed 1 splits and kept 548 clauses.
% 0.21/0.54  SPASS allocated 64110 KBytes.
% 0.21/0.54  SPASS spent	0:00:00.18 on the problem.
% 0.21/0.54  		0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 0.21/0.54  		0:00:00.00 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.21/0.54  		0:00:00.01 for inferences.
% 0.21/0.54  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.21/0.54  		0:00:00.09 for the reduction.
% 0.21/0.54  
% 0.21/0.54  
% 0.21/0.54  Here is a proof with depth 4, length 22 :
% 0.21/0.54  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.55  Formulae used in the proof : clause119 clause120 clause112 unI1 unI2 clause158 un_eq_Union_2_c1 un_eq_Union_2_c2
% 0.21/0.55  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------