TSTP Solution File: SET780-1 by E---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1
% Problem  : SET780-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:20:51 EDT 2023

% Result   : Satisfiable 0.19s 0.50s
% Output   : Saturation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named difference_axiom3)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_0_12,axiom,
    ( difference(X1,X2,X3)
    | member(k(X1,X2,X3),X1)
    | member(k(X1,X2,X3),X3) ),
    difference_axiom2,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_13,axiom,
    ( member(k(X1,X2,X3),X2)
    | difference(X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ member(k(X1,X2,X3),X3)
    | ~ member(k(X1,X2,X3),X1) ),
    difference_axiom3,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( difference(X1,X2,X1)
    | member(k(X1,X2,X1),X1) ),
    inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_15,axiom,
    ( member(k(X1,X2,X3),X3)
    | difference(X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ member(k(X1,X2,X3),X2) ),
    difference_axiom1,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_16,axiom,
    ( subset(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(member_of_1_not_of_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
    subsets_axiom2,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_17,axiom,
    ( subset(X1,X2)
    | member(member_of_1_not_of_2(X1,X2),X1) ),
    subsets_axiom1,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( difference(X1,X2,X1)
    | member(k(X1,X2,X1),X2) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_14]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( difference(X1,X1,X2)
    | member(k(X1,X1,X2),X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_12]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_20,axiom,
    ( member(X1,X4)
    | member(X1,X3)
    | ~ member(X1,X2)
    | ~ difference(X2,X3,X4) ),
    member_of_difference_or_set2,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_21,axiom,
    ( member(X4,X1)
    | ~ difference(X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ member(X4,X3) ),
    member_of_difference,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_22,axiom,
    ( member(X1,X3)
    | ~ member(X1,X2)
    | ~ subset(X2,X3) ),
    membership_in_subsets,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_23,axiom,
    ( ~ member(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X1,X3)
    | ~ difference(X4,X2,X3) ),
    not_member_of_difference,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_24,axiom,
    ( equal_sets(X2,X1)
    | ~ subset(X1,X2)
    | ~ subset(X2,X1) ),
    subsets_are_set_equal_sets,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_25,axiom,
    ( subset(X1,X2)
    | ~ equal_sets(X1,X2) ),
    set_equal_sets_are_subsets1,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_26,axiom,
    ( subset(X2,X1)
    | ~ equal_sets(X1,X2) ),
    set_equal_sets_are_subsets2,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    subset(X1,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]),
    [final] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem    : SET780-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.00/0.14  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime   : Mon Oct  2 17:28:21 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.19/0.49  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.19/0.49  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.VjWwOdkrZs/E---3.1_27711.p
% 0.19/0.50  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.19/0.50  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.50  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 27796 completed with status 1
% 0.19/0.50  # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.19/0.50  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.50  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.19/0.50  # Search class: FGHNF-FFSF32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.50  # partial match(1): FGHNF-FFSF22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.50  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 811s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting sh5l with 136s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 27805 completed with status 1
% 0.19/0.50  # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.19/0.50  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.50  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.19/0.50  # Search class: FGHNF-FFSF32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.50  # partial match(1): FGHNF-FFSF22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.50  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 811s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.19/0.50  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.19/0.50  
% 0.19/0.50  # No proof found!
% 0.19/0.50  # SZS status Satisfiable
% 0.19/0.50  # SZS output start Saturation
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.50  # Parsed axioms                        : 12
% 0.19/0.50  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Initial clauses                      : 12
% 0.19/0.50  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 12
% 0.19/0.50  # Processed clauses                    : 33
% 0.19/0.50  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # ...subsumed                          : 5
% 0.19/0.50  # ...remaining for further processing  : 28
% 0.19/0.50  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Generated clauses                    : 15
% 0.19/0.50  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 9
% 0.19/0.50  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 1
% 0.19/0.50  # Paramodulations                      : 13
% 0.19/0.50  # Factorizations                       : 2
% 0.19/0.50  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Total rewrite steps                  : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.19/0.50  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.19/0.50  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.19/0.50  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.19/0.50  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.19/0.50  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.19/0.50  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.19/0.50  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.19/0.50  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.19/0.50  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.19/0.50  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.19/0.50  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.19/0.50  # Current number of processed clauses  : 16
% 0.19/0.50  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 1
% 0.19/0.50  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.19/0.50  #    Negative unit clauses             : 0
% 0.19/0.50  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 15
% 0.19/0.50  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.19/0.50  # ...number of literals in the above   : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Current number of archived clauses   : 12
% 0.19/0.50  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 70
% 0.19/0.50  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 51
% 0.19/0.50  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 6
% 0.19/0.50  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4
% 0.19/0.50  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 3
% 0.19/0.50  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 590
% 0.19/0.50  
% 0.19/0.50  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.50  # User time                : 0.005 s
% 0.19/0.50  # System time              : 0.000 s
% 0.19/0.50  # Total time               : 0.005 s
% 0.19/0.50  # Maximum resident set size: 1688 pages
% 0.19/0.50  
% 0.19/0.50  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.50  # User time                : 0.018 s
% 0.19/0.50  # System time              : 0.005 s
% 0.19/0.50  # Total time               : 0.023 s
% 0.19/0.50  # Maximum resident set size: 1680 pages
% 0.19/0.50  % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.19/0.51  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------