TSTP Solution File: SET779-1 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : SET779-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:20:50 EDT 2023
% Result : Satisfiable 0.16s 0.45s
% Output : Saturation 0.16s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named intersection_axiom3)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_0_12,axiom,
( member(h(X1,X2,X3),X3)
| intersection(X1,X2,X3)
| member(h(X1,X2,X3),X2) ),
intersection_axiom2,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_13,axiom,
( member(h(X1,X2,X3),X3)
| intersection(X1,X2,X3)
| member(h(X1,X2,X3),X1) ),
intersection_axiom1,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_14,axiom,
( intersection(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ member(h(X1,X2,X3),X3)
| ~ member(h(X1,X2,X3),X2)
| ~ member(h(X1,X2,X3),X1) ),
intersection_axiom3,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( intersection(X1,X2,X2)
| member(h(X1,X2,X2),X2) ),
inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( intersection(X1,X2,X1)
| member(h(X1,X2,X1),X1) ),
inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( intersection(X1,X2,X2)
| ~ member(h(X1,X2,X2),X1) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_15]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_18,axiom,
( subset(X1,X2)
| ~ member(member_of_1_not_of_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
subsets_axiom2,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_19,axiom,
( subset(X1,X2)
| member(member_of_1_not_of_2(X1,X2),X1) ),
subsets_axiom1,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
( intersection(X1,X2,X1)
| ~ member(h(X1,X2,X1),X2) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_16]),c_0_16]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_21,axiom,
( member(X4,X3)
| ~ intersection(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ member(X4,X2)
| ~ member(X4,X1) ),
member_of_both_is_member_of_intersection,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_22,axiom,
( member(X4,X1)
| ~ intersection(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ member(X4,X3) ),
member_of_intersection_is_member_of_set1,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_23,axiom,
( member(X4,X2)
| ~ intersection(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ member(X4,X3) ),
member_of_intersection_is_member_of_set2,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_24,axiom,
( member(X1,X3)
| ~ member(X1,X2)
| ~ subset(X2,X3) ),
membership_in_subsets,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_25,axiom,
( equal_sets(X2,X1)
| ~ subset(X1,X2)
| ~ subset(X2,X1) ),
subsets_are_set_equal_sets,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_26,axiom,
( subset(X1,X2)
| ~ equal_sets(X1,X2) ),
set_equal_sets_are_subsets1,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_27,axiom,
( subset(X2,X1)
| ~ equal_sets(X1,X2) ),
set_equal_sets_are_subsets2,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
intersection(X1,X1,X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_15]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
subset(X1,X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]),
[final] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.02/0.11 % Problem : SET779-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.02/0.12 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.11/0.32 % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.11/0.32 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.32 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 17:32:08 EDT 2023
% 0.11/0.32 % CPUTime :
% 0.16/0.44 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.16/0.44 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.t7FXcUANzC/E---3.1_22382.p
% 0.16/0.45 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.16/0.45 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.45 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.45 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.45 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.45 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.45 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.45 # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 22460 completed with status 1
% 0.16/0.45 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.16/0.45 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.45 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.45 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.45 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.16/0.45 # Search class: FGUNF-FFSF32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.16/0.45 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.16/0.45 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 811s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.45 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.45 # Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.45 # Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.45 # Starting sh5l with 136s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.45 # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 22467 completed with status 1
% 0.16/0.45 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.16/0.45 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.45 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.45 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.45 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.16/0.45 # Search class: FGUNF-FFSF32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.16/0.45 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.16/0.45 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 811s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.45 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.45 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.16/0.45 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.16/0.45
% 0.16/0.45 # No proof found!
% 0.16/0.45 # SZS status Satisfiable
% 0.16/0.45 # SZS output start Saturation
% See solution above
% 0.16/0.45 # Parsed axioms : 12
% 0.16/0.45 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.16/0.45 # Initial clauses : 12
% 0.16/0.45 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.16/0.45 # Initial clauses in saturation : 12
% 0.16/0.45 # Processed clauses : 34
% 0.16/0.45 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.16/0.45 # ...subsumed : 4
% 0.16/0.45 # ...remaining for further processing : 30
% 0.16/0.45 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.16/0.45 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.16/0.45 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.16/0.45 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.16/0.45 # Generated clauses : 21
% 0.16/0.45 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 10
% 0.16/0.45 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.16/0.45 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 2
% 0.16/0.45 # Paramodulations : 17
% 0.16/0.45 # Factorizations : 4
% 0.16/0.45 # NegExts : 0
% 0.16/0.45 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.16/0.45 # Total rewrite steps : 3
% 0.16/0.45 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.16/0.45 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.16/0.45 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.16/0.45 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.16/0.45 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.16/0.45 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.16/0.45 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.45 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.45 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.45 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.45 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.45 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.45 # Current number of processed clauses : 18
% 0.16/0.45 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 2
% 0.16/0.45 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.16/0.45 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.16/0.45 # Non-unit-clauses : 16
% 0.16/0.45 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.16/0.45 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.16/0.45 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.16/0.45 # Current number of archived clauses : 12
% 0.16/0.45 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 55
% 0.16/0.45 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 45
% 0.16/0.45 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 6
% 0.16/0.45 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 9
% 0.16/0.45 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.16/0.45 # BW rewrite match attempts : 7
% 0.16/0.45 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.16/0.45 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.16/0.45 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.16/0.45 # Termbank termtop insertions : 623
% 0.16/0.45
% 0.16/0.45 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.45 # User time : 0.002 s
% 0.16/0.45 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.16/0.45 # Total time : 0.004 s
% 0.16/0.45 # Maximum resident set size: 1640 pages
% 0.16/0.45
% 0.16/0.45 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.45 # User time : 0.013 s
% 0.16/0.45 # System time : 0.005 s
% 0.16/0.45 # Total time : 0.018 s
% 0.16/0.45 # Maximum resident set size: 1680 pages
% 0.16/0.45 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.16/0.45 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------