TSTP Solution File: SET778-1 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : SET778-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art01.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 05:42:07 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP20431/SET/SET778-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ............ done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 1] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 39] [nf = 13] [nu = 3] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 335] [nf = 54] [nu = 32] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 1617] [nf = 237] [nu = 177] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 6841] [nf = 1256] [nu = 816] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 35539] [nf = 5227] [nu = 3611] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 187385] [nf = 23964] [nu = 18124] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 855555] [nf = 137957] [nu = 91027] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 8 secs [nr = 3987877] [nf = 683996] [nu = 422360] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% Entering time slice 2
% Updating parameters ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 32 secs [nr = 16899761] [nf = 2565245] [nu = 1669820] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 32 secs [nr = 16899801] [nf = 2565258] [nu = 1669825] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 32 secs [nr = 16900118] [nf = 2565331] [nu = 1669854] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 32 secs [nr = 16901845] [nf = 2565940] [nu = 1669999] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 32 secs [nr = 16912618] [nf = 2569986] [nu = 1670734] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 32 secs [nr = 17010752] [nf = 2602890] [nu = 1675717] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 33 secs [nr = 17772826] [nf = 2872300] [nu = 1714596] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 47 secs [nr = 23788009] [nf = 5365803] [nu = 1993733] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 167 secs [nr = 79439166] [nf = 26907115] [nu = 4142522] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 195201378
% resolvents: 151992349 factors: 43209029
% Number of unit clauses generated: 8688465
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 4.45
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [2] = 2
% Total = 2
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 8688465 [2] = 60291973 [3] = 62753934 [4] = 41752672 [5] = 18272214 [6] = 3442120
% Average size of a generated clause: 4.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] equal_sets_2 (+)1 (-)0
% [1] member_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [2] subset_2 (+)1 (-)0
% [3] union_3 (+)0 (-)0
% ------------------
% Total: (+)2 (-)0
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 2
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 331668493
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 14486073
% Number of successful unifications: 195201378
% Number of unification failures: 7943130
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 343824530
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 217406301
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 21
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 7518380
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 2
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 1
% Number of states in UCFA table: 6
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 4
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 1.50
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 40
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 203144508
% ConstructUnitClause() = 7518382
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 7.53 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 650671
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 305 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------