TSTP Solution File: SET777-1 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : SET777-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art06.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 05:42:00 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.07s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP1885/SET/SET777-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ...... done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 1] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 35] [nf = 9] [nu = 3] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 303] [nf = 28] [nu = 32] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 1483] [nf = 177] [nu = 177] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 6189] [nf = 1094] [nu = 816] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 33129] [nf = 4703] [nu = 3611] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 178045] [nf = 21842] [nu = 18124] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 809835] [nf = 130107] [nu = 91027] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 7 secs [nr = 3767101] [nf = 650614] [nu = 422360] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% Entering time slice 2
% Updating parameters ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 31 secs [nr = 17555100] [nf = 2646629] [nu = 1812866] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 31 secs [nr = 17555136] [nf = 2646638] [nu = 1812871] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 31 secs [nr = 17555412] [nf = 2646661] [nu = 1812900] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 31 secs [nr = 17556694] [nf = 2646870] [nu = 1813045] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 31 secs [nr = 17564411] [nf = 2648423] [nu = 1813780] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 31 secs [nr = 17635005] [nf = 2658664] [nu = 1818763] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 32 secs [nr = 18179894] [nf = 2758647] [nu = 1857642] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 40 secs [nr = 22154842] [nf = 3699162] [nu = 2136779] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 107 secs [nr = 58896210] [nf = 11876559] [nu = 4285568] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 202111342
% resolvents: 170229896 factors: 31881446
% Number of unit clauses generated: 12079943
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 5.98
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [2] = 2
% Total = 2
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 12079943 [2] = 82280837 [3] = 73939477 [4] = 30003531 [5] = 3807554
% Average size of a generated clause: 3.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] equal_sets_2 (+)1 (-)0
% [1] member_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [2] subset_2 (+)1 (-)0
% ------------------
% Total: (+)2 (-)0
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 2
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 159991169
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 13089862
% Number of successful unifications: 202111342
% Number of unification failures: 0
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 303346400
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 194894362
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 21
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 10527744
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 2
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 1
% Number of states in UCFA table: 6
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 4
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 1.50
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 38
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 202111342
% ConstructUnitClause() = 10527746
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 10.41 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 673704
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 302 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------