TSTP Solution File: SET767+4 by SnakeForV-SAT---1.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
% Problem  : SET767+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s

% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 18:25:35 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.20s 0.49s
% Output   : Refutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   29 (   5 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   85 (   1 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   89 (  33   ~;  25   |;  21   &)
%                                         (   4 <=>;   6  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   4 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   68 (  56   !;  12   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f141,plain,
    $false,
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f140,f110]) ).

fof(f110,plain,
    ~ subset(sF6,sK1),
    inference(definition_folding,[],[f82,f109]) ).

fof(f109,plain,
    sF6 = equivalence_class(sK3,sK1,sK2),
    introduced(function_definition,[]) ).

fof(f82,plain,
    ~ subset(equivalence_class(sK3,sK1,sK2),sK1),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f50]) ).

fof(f50,plain,
    ( equivalence(sK2,sK1)
    & ~ subset(equivalence_class(sK3,sK1,sK2),sK1) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK1,sK2,sK3])],[f48,f49]) ).

fof(f49,plain,
    ( ? [X0,X1,X2] :
        ( equivalence(X1,X0)
        & ~ subset(equivalence_class(X2,X0,X1),X0) )
   => ( equivalence(sK2,sK1)
      & ~ subset(equivalence_class(sK3,sK1,sK2),sK1) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f48,plain,
    ? [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( equivalence(X1,X0)
      & ~ subset(equivalence_class(X2,X0,X1),X0) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f35]) ).

fof(f35,plain,
    ? [X1,X2,X0] :
      ( equivalence(X2,X1)
      & ~ subset(equivalence_class(X0,X1,X2),X1) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f24]) ).

fof(f24,plain,
    ~ ! [X2,X0,X1] :
        ( equivalence(X2,X1)
       => subset(equivalence_class(X0,X1,X2),X1) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f18]) ).

fof(f18,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0,X3,X6] :
        ( equivalence(X6,X3)
       => subset(equivalence_class(X0,X3,X6),X3) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f17]) ).

fof(f17,conjecture,
    ! [X0,X3,X6] :
      ( equivalence(X6,X3)
     => subset(equivalence_class(X0,X3,X6),X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',thIII03) ).

fof(f140,plain,
    subset(sF6,sK1),
    inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f138]) ).

fof(f138,plain,
    ( subset(sF6,sK1)
    | subset(sF6,sK1) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f137,f76]) ).

fof(f76,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ member(sK0(X0,X1),X1)
      | subset(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f44]) ).

fof(f44,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( ! [X2] :
            ( member(X2,X1)
            | ~ member(X2,X0) )
        | ~ subset(X0,X1) )
      & ( subset(X0,X1)
        | ( ~ member(sK0(X0,X1),X1)
          & member(sK0(X0,X1),X0) ) ) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0])],[f42,f43]) ).

fof(f43,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ? [X3] :
          ( ~ member(X3,X1)
          & member(X3,X0) )
     => ( ~ member(sK0(X0,X1),X1)
        & member(sK0(X0,X1),X0) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f42,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( ! [X2] :
            ( member(X2,X1)
            | ~ member(X2,X0) )
        | ~ subset(X0,X1) )
      & ( subset(X0,X1)
        | ? [X3] :
            ( ~ member(X3,X1)
            & member(X3,X0) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f41]) ).

fof(f41,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( ! [X2] :
            ( member(X2,X1)
            | ~ member(X2,X0) )
        | ~ subset(X0,X1) )
      & ( subset(X0,X1)
        | ? [X2] :
            ( ~ member(X2,X1)
            & member(X2,X0) ) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f33]) ).

fof(f33,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ! [X2] :
          ( member(X2,X1)
          | ~ member(X2,X0) )
    <=> subset(X0,X1) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).

fof(f1,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( subset(X0,X1)
    <=> ! [X2] :
          ( member(X2,X0)
         => member(X2,X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',subset) ).

fof(f137,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( member(sK0(sF6,X0),sK1)
      | subset(sF6,X0) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f136,f75]) ).

fof(f75,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( member(sK0(X0,X1),X0)
      | subset(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f44]) ).

fof(f136,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ member(X0,sF6)
      | member(X0,sK1) ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f80,f109]) ).

fof(f80,plain,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ member(X1,equivalence_class(X3,X0,X2))
      | member(X1,X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f47]) ).

fof(f47,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ( ( apply(X2,X3,X1)
          & member(X1,X0) )
        | ~ member(X1,equivalence_class(X3,X0,X2)) )
      & ( member(X1,equivalence_class(X3,X0,X2))
        | ~ apply(X2,X3,X1)
        | ~ member(X1,X0) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f46]) ).

fof(f46,plain,
    ! [X3,X1,X0,X2] :
      ( ( ( apply(X0,X2,X1)
          & member(X1,X3) )
        | ~ member(X1,equivalence_class(X2,X3,X0)) )
      & ( member(X1,equivalence_class(X2,X3,X0))
        | ~ apply(X0,X2,X1)
        | ~ member(X1,X3) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f45]) ).

fof(f45,plain,
    ! [X3,X1,X0,X2] :
      ( ( ( apply(X0,X2,X1)
          & member(X1,X3) )
        | ~ member(X1,equivalence_class(X2,X3,X0)) )
      & ( member(X1,equivalence_class(X2,X3,X0))
        | ~ apply(X0,X2,X1)
        | ~ member(X1,X3) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f30]) ).

fof(f30,plain,
    ! [X3,X1,X0,X2] :
      ( ( apply(X0,X2,X1)
        & member(X1,X3) )
    <=> member(X1,equivalence_class(X2,X3,X0)) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f15]) ).

fof(f15,axiom,
    ! [X6,X2,X0,X3] :
      ( member(X2,equivalence_class(X0,X3,X6))
    <=> ( apply(X6,X0,X2)
        & member(X2,X3) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',equivalence_class) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.12  % Problem    : SET767+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.10/0.12  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime   : Tue Aug 30 14:26:00 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.20/0.48  % (6934)ott+10_1:28_bd=off:bs=on:tgt=ground:i=101:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/101Mi)
% 0.20/0.48  % (6934)First to succeed.
% 0.20/0.49  % (6934)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.20/0.49  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.49  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.49  % (6934)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.49  % (6934)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.20/0.49  % (6934)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.20/0.49  % (6934)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.20/0.49  
% 0.20/0.49  % (6934)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.20/0.49  % (6934)Time elapsed: 0.090 s
% 0.20/0.49  % (6934)Instructions burned: 5 (million)
% 0.20/0.49  % (6934)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.49  % (6934)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.49  % (6921)Success in time 0.142 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------