TSTP Solution File: SET767+4 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : SET767+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 00:53:51 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.24s 1.41s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.24s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 14 ( 3 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 37 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 7 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 35 ( 12 ~; 12 |; 6 &)
% ( 2 <=>; 3 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 14 ( 5 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 3 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 41 ( 10 sgn 26 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(equivalence_class,axiom,
! [X7,X4,X1,X3] :
( member(X3,equivalence_class(X1,X4,X7))
<=> ( member(X3,X4)
& apply(X7,X1,X3) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET006+2.ax',equivalence_class) ).
fof(subset,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( subset(X1,X2)
<=> ! [X3] :
( member(X3,X1)
=> member(X3,X2) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET006+0.ax',subset) ).
fof(thIII03,conjecture,
! [X4,X7,X1] :
( equivalence(X7,X4)
=> subset(equivalence_class(X1,X4,X7),X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',thIII03) ).
fof(c_0_3,plain,
! [X8,X9,X10,X11,X8,X9,X10,X11] :
( ( member(X11,X9)
| ~ member(X11,equivalence_class(X10,X9,X8)) )
& ( apply(X8,X10,X11)
| ~ member(X11,equivalence_class(X10,X9,X8)) )
& ( ~ member(X11,X9)
| ~ apply(X8,X10,X11)
| member(X11,equivalence_class(X10,X9,X8)) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[equivalence_class])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_4,plain,
! [X4,X5,X6,X4,X5] :
( ( ~ subset(X4,X5)
| ~ member(X6,X4)
| member(X6,X5) )
& ( member(esk4_2(X4,X5),X4)
| subset(X4,X5) )
& ( ~ member(esk4_2(X4,X5),X5)
| subset(X4,X5) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[subset])])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X4,X7,X1] :
( equivalence(X7,X4)
=> subset(equivalence_class(X1,X4,X7),X4) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[thIII03]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
( member(X1,X3)
| ~ member(X1,equivalence_class(X2,X3,X4)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( subset(X1,X2)
| member(esk4_2(X1,X2),X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
( equivalence(esk2_0,esk1_0)
& ~ subset(equivalence_class(esk3_0,esk1_0,esk2_0),esk1_0) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( subset(X1,X2)
| ~ member(esk4_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( member(esk4_2(equivalence_class(X1,X2,X3),X4),X2)
| subset(equivalence_class(X1,X2,X3),X4) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
~ subset(equivalence_class(esk3_0,esk1_0,esk2_0),esk1_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
subset(equivalence_class(X1,X2,X3),X2),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12 % Problem : SET767+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.04/0.13 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Jul 9 17:45:43 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.24/1.41 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.24/1.41 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.24/1.41 # Preprocessing time : 0.017 s
% 0.24/1.41
% 0.24/1.41 # Proof found!
% 0.24/1.41 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.24/1.41 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.24/1.41 # Proof object total steps : 14
% 0.24/1.41 # Proof object clause steps : 7
% 0.24/1.41 # Proof object formula steps : 7
% 0.24/1.41 # Proof object conjectures : 5
% 0.24/1.41 # Proof object clause conjectures : 2
% 0.24/1.41 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.24/1.41 # Proof object initial clauses used : 4
% 0.24/1.41 # Proof object initial formulas used : 3
% 0.24/1.41 # Proof object generating inferences : 2
% 0.24/1.41 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 2
% 0.24/1.41 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.24/1.41 # Parsed axioms : 17
% 0.24/1.41 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 13
% 0.24/1.41 # Initial clauses : 61
% 0.24/1.41 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.24/1.41 # Initial clauses in saturation : 61
% 0.24/1.41 # Processed clauses : 67
% 0.24/1.41 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.24/1.41 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.24/1.41 # ...remaining for further processing : 67
% 0.24/1.41 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.24/1.41 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.24/1.41 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.24/1.41 # Backward-rewritten : 1
% 0.24/1.41 # Generated clauses : 113
% 0.24/1.41 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 109
% 0.24/1.41 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.24/1.41 # Paramodulations : 113
% 0.24/1.41 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.24/1.41 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.24/1.41 # Current number of processed clauses : 66
% 0.24/1.41 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 4
% 0.24/1.41 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.24/1.41 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.24/1.41 # Non-unit-clauses : 62
% 0.24/1.41 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 103
% 0.24/1.41 # ...number of literals in the above : 554
% 0.24/1.41 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.24/1.41 # Current number of archived clauses : 1
% 0.24/1.41 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1299
% 0.24/1.41 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 623
% 0.24/1.41 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.24/1.41 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 175
% 0.24/1.41 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.24/1.41 # BW rewrite match attempts : 6
% 0.24/1.41 # BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.24/1.41 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.24/1.41 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.24/1.41 # Termbank termtop insertions : 6032
% 0.24/1.41
% 0.24/1.41 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.24/1.41 # User time : 0.021 s
% 0.24/1.41 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.24/1.41 # Total time : 0.024 s
% 0.24/1.41 # Maximum resident set size: 3092 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------