TSTP Solution File: SET767+4 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : SET767+4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:56:59 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 26.37s 12.84s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 26.37s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :   44
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   51 (   3 unt;  41 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   19 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   13 (   4   ~;   4   |;   1   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   73 (  37   >;  36   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    9 (   8 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   33 (  33 usr;   4 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   25 (;  25   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ apply > subset > pre_order > partition > member > equivalence > equal_set > disjoint > equivalence_class > unordered_pair > union > intersection > difference > #nlpp > sum > singleton > product > power_set > empty_set > #skF_11 > #skF_6 > #skF_17 > #skF_20 > #skF_3 > #skF_13 > #skF_14 > #skF_12 > #skF_18 > #skF_19 > #skF_8 > #skF_21 > #skF_22 > #skF_2 > #skF_23 > #skF_7 > #skF_1 > #skF_16 > #skF_9 > #skF_5 > #skF_15 > #skF_4 > #skF_10

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff('#skF_11',type,
    '#skF_11': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(equal_set,type,
    equal_set: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(power_set,type,
    power_set: $i > $i ).

tff('#skF_6',type,
    '#skF_6': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(product,type,
    product: $i > $i ).

tff(apply,type,
    apply: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(singleton,type,
    singleton: $i > $i ).

tff(partition,type,
    partition: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(unordered_pair,type,
    unordered_pair: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_17',type,
    '#skF_17': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_20',type,
    '#skF_20': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(sum,type,
    sum: $i > $i ).

tff(intersection,type,
    intersection: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(union,type,
    union: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_3',type,
    '#skF_3': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_13',type,
    '#skF_13': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_14',type,
    '#skF_14': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_12',type,
    '#skF_12': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_18',type,
    '#skF_18': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_19',type,
    '#skF_19': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(subset,type,
    subset: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(member,type,
    member: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(equivalence,type,
    equivalence: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff('#skF_8',type,
    '#skF_8': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(disjoint,type,
    disjoint: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff('#skF_21',type,
    '#skF_21': $i ).

tff(empty_set,type,
    empty_set: $i ).

tff(pre_order,type,
    pre_order: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff('#skF_22',type,
    '#skF_22': $i ).

tff('#skF_2',type,
    '#skF_2': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(difference,type,
    difference: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_23',type,
    '#skF_23': $i ).

tff(equivalence_class,type,
    equivalence_class: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_7',type,
    '#skF_7': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_1',type,
    '#skF_1': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_16',type,
    '#skF_16': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_9',type,
    '#skF_9': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_5',type,
    '#skF_5': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_15',type,
    '#skF_15': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_4',type,
    '#skF_4': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_10',type,
    '#skF_10': ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(f_56,axiom,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( subset(A,B)
    <=> ! [X] :
          ( member(X,A)
         => member(X,B) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET006+0.ax',subset) ).

tff(f_208,axiom,
    ! [R,E,A,X] :
      ( member(X,equivalence_class(A,E,R))
    <=> ( member(X,E)
        & apply(R,A,X) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET006+2.ax',equivalence_class) ).

tff(f_235,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [E,R,A] :
        ( equivalence(R,E)
       => subset(equivalence_class(A,E,R),E) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',thIII03) ).

tff(c_6,plain,
    ! [A_1,B_2] :
      ( member('#skF_1'(A_1,B_2),A_1)
      | subset(A_1,B_2) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_56]) ).

tff(c_802,plain,
    ! [X_209,E_210,A_211,R_212] :
      ( member(X_209,E_210)
      | ~ member(X_209,equivalence_class(A_211,E_210,R_212)) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_208]) ).

tff(c_53575,plain,
    ! [A_1705,E_1706,R_1707,B_1708] :
      ( member('#skF_1'(equivalence_class(A_1705,E_1706,R_1707),B_1708),E_1706)
      | subset(equivalence_class(A_1705,E_1706,R_1707),B_1708) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_6,c_802]) ).

tff(c_4,plain,
    ! [A_1,B_2] :
      ( ~ member('#skF_1'(A_1,B_2),B_2)
      | subset(A_1,B_2) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_56]) ).

tff(c_53889,plain,
    ! [A_1705,E_1706,R_1707] : subset(equivalence_class(A_1705,E_1706,R_1707),E_1706),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_53575,c_4]) ).

tff(c_250,plain,
    ~ subset(equivalence_class('#skF_23','#skF_21','#skF_22'),'#skF_21'),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_235]) ).

tff(c_53900,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_53889,c_250]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13  % Problem  : SET767+4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.00/0.14  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 16:17:50 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 26.37/12.84  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 26.37/12.85  
% 26.37/12.85  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 26.37/12.87  
% 26.37/12.87  Inference rules
% 26.37/12.87  ----------------------
% 26.37/12.87  #Ref     : 0
% 26.37/12.87  #Sup     : 12432
% 26.37/12.87  #Fact    : 0
% 26.37/12.87  #Define  : 0
% 26.37/12.87  #Split   : 1
% 26.37/12.87  #Chain   : 0
% 26.37/12.87  #Close   : 0
% 26.37/12.87  
% 26.37/12.87  Ordering : KBO
% 26.37/12.87  
% 26.37/12.87  Simplification rules
% 26.37/12.87  ----------------------
% 26.37/12.87  #Subsume      : 1046
% 26.37/12.87  #Demod        : 2213
% 26.37/12.87  #Tautology    : 2213
% 26.37/12.87  #SimpNegUnit  : 419
% 26.37/12.87  #BackRed      : 9
% 26.37/12.87  
% 26.37/12.87  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 26.37/12.87  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 26.37/12.87  
% 26.37/12.87  Timing (in seconds)
% 26.37/12.87  ----------------------
% 26.37/12.87  Preprocessing        : 0.60
% 26.37/12.87  Parsing              : 0.28
% 26.37/12.87  CNF conversion       : 0.06
% 26.37/12.87  Main loop            : 11.24
% 26.37/12.87  Inferencing          : 1.82
% 26.37/12.87  Reduction            : 5.14
% 26.37/12.87  Demodulation         : 3.71
% 26.37/12.87  BG Simplification    : 0.11
% 26.37/12.87  Subsumption          : 3.39
% 26.37/12.87  Abstraction          : 0.13
% 26.37/12.87  MUC search           : 0.00
% 26.37/12.87  Cooper               : 0.00
% 26.37/12.87  Total                : 11.88
% 26.37/12.87  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 26.37/12.87  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 26.37/12.87  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 26.37/12.87  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------