TSTP Solution File: SET731+4 by iProver---3.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.8
% Problem  : SET731+4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v2.2.1.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover %s %d THM

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 15:09:23 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 3.63s 1.19s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.63s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   17
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   47 (   8 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  194 (  17 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   20 (   4 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  232 (  85   ~;  68   |;  57   &)
%                                         (   9 <=>;  13  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   15 (   6 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    7 (   5 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   5 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  156 (   0 sgn;  94   !;  30   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f18,axiom,
    ! [X5,X0,X1] :
      ( surjective(X5,X0,X1)
    <=> ! [X4] :
          ( member(X4,X1)
         => ? [X3] :
              ( apply(X5,X3,X4)
              & member(X3,X0) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',surjective) ).

fof(f22,axiom,
    ! [X5,X0,X4] :
      ( member(X4,image2(X5,X0))
    <=> ? [X2] :
          ( apply(X5,X2,X4)
          & member(X2,X0) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',image2) ).

fof(f29,conjecture,
    ! [X5,X9,X0,X1,X10] :
      ( ( ! [X2,X4] :
            ( ( member(X4,X10)
              & member(X2,X0) )
           => ( apply(X9,X2,X4)
            <=> apply(X5,X2,X4) ) )
        & image2(X5,X0) = X10
        & subset(X10,X1)
        & maps(X5,X0,X1) )
     => surjective(X9,X0,X10) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',thII22) ).

fof(f30,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X5,X9,X0,X1,X10] :
        ( ( ! [X2,X4] :
              ( ( member(X4,X10)
                & member(X2,X0) )
             => ( apply(X9,X2,X4)
              <=> apply(X5,X2,X4) ) )
          & image2(X5,X0) = X10
          & subset(X10,X1)
          & maps(X5,X0,X1) )
       => surjective(X9,X0,X10) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f29]) ).

fof(f46,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( surjective(X0,X1,X2)
    <=> ! [X3] :
          ( member(X3,X2)
         => ? [X4] :
              ( apply(X0,X4,X3)
              & member(X4,X1) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f18]) ).

fof(f50,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( member(X2,image2(X0,X1))
    <=> ? [X3] :
          ( apply(X0,X3,X2)
          & member(X3,X1) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f22]) ).

fof(f57,plain,
    ~ ! [X0,X1,X2,X3,X4] :
        ( ( ! [X5,X6] :
              ( ( member(X6,X4)
                & member(X5,X2) )
             => ( apply(X1,X5,X6)
              <=> apply(X0,X5,X6) ) )
          & image2(X0,X2) = X4
          & subset(X4,X3)
          & maps(X0,X2,X3) )
       => surjective(X1,X2,X4) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f30]) ).

fof(f58,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ! [X3] :
          ( member(X3,X2)
         => ? [X4] :
              ( apply(X0,X4,X3)
              & member(X4,X1) ) )
     => surjective(X0,X1,X2) ),
    inference(unused_predicate_definition_removal,[],[f46]) ).

fof(f66,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( surjective(X0,X1,X2)
      | ? [X3] :
          ( ! [X4] :
              ( ~ apply(X0,X4,X3)
              | ~ member(X4,X1) )
          & member(X3,X2) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f58]) ).

fof(f69,plain,
    ? [X0,X1,X2,X3,X4] :
      ( ~ surjective(X1,X2,X4)
      & ! [X5,X6] :
          ( ( apply(X1,X5,X6)
          <=> apply(X0,X5,X6) )
          | ~ member(X6,X4)
          | ~ member(X5,X2) )
      & image2(X0,X2) = X4
      & subset(X4,X3)
      & maps(X0,X2,X3) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f57]) ).

fof(f70,plain,
    ? [X0,X1,X2,X3,X4] :
      ( ~ surjective(X1,X2,X4)
      & ! [X5,X6] :
          ( ( apply(X1,X5,X6)
          <=> apply(X0,X5,X6) )
          | ~ member(X6,X4)
          | ~ member(X5,X2) )
      & image2(X0,X2) = X4
      & subset(X4,X3)
      & maps(X0,X2,X3) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f69]) ).

fof(f99,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ? [X3] :
          ( ! [X4] :
              ( ~ apply(X0,X4,X3)
              | ~ member(X4,X1) )
          & member(X3,X2) )
     => ( ! [X4] :
            ( ~ apply(X0,X4,sK5(X0,X1,X2))
            | ~ member(X4,X1) )
        & member(sK5(X0,X1,X2),X2) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f100,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( surjective(X0,X1,X2)
      | ( ! [X4] :
            ( ~ apply(X0,X4,sK5(X0,X1,X2))
            | ~ member(X4,X1) )
        & member(sK5(X0,X1,X2),X2) ) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK5])],[f66,f99]) ).

fof(f102,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ( member(X2,image2(X0,X1))
        | ! [X3] :
            ( ~ apply(X0,X3,X2)
            | ~ member(X3,X1) ) )
      & ( ? [X3] :
            ( apply(X0,X3,X2)
            & member(X3,X1) )
        | ~ member(X2,image2(X0,X1)) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f50]) ).

fof(f103,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ( member(X2,image2(X0,X1))
        | ! [X3] :
            ( ~ apply(X0,X3,X2)
            | ~ member(X3,X1) ) )
      & ( ? [X4] :
            ( apply(X0,X4,X2)
            & member(X4,X1) )
        | ~ member(X2,image2(X0,X1)) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f102]) ).

fof(f104,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ? [X4] :
          ( apply(X0,X4,X2)
          & member(X4,X1) )
     => ( apply(X0,sK6(X0,X1,X2),X2)
        & member(sK6(X0,X1,X2),X1) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f105,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ( member(X2,image2(X0,X1))
        | ! [X3] :
            ( ~ apply(X0,X3,X2)
            | ~ member(X3,X1) ) )
      & ( ( apply(X0,sK6(X0,X1,X2),X2)
          & member(sK6(X0,X1,X2),X1) )
        | ~ member(X2,image2(X0,X1)) ) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK6])],[f103,f104]) ).

fof(f120,plain,
    ? [X0,X1,X2,X3,X4] :
      ( ~ surjective(X1,X2,X4)
      & ! [X5,X6] :
          ( ( ( apply(X1,X5,X6)
              | ~ apply(X0,X5,X6) )
            & ( apply(X0,X5,X6)
              | ~ apply(X1,X5,X6) ) )
          | ~ member(X6,X4)
          | ~ member(X5,X2) )
      & image2(X0,X2) = X4
      & subset(X4,X3)
      & maps(X0,X2,X3) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f70]) ).

fof(f121,plain,
    ( ? [X0,X1,X2,X3,X4] :
        ( ~ surjective(X1,X2,X4)
        & ! [X5,X6] :
            ( ( ( apply(X1,X5,X6)
                | ~ apply(X0,X5,X6) )
              & ( apply(X0,X5,X6)
                | ~ apply(X1,X5,X6) ) )
            | ~ member(X6,X4)
            | ~ member(X5,X2) )
        & image2(X0,X2) = X4
        & subset(X4,X3)
        & maps(X0,X2,X3) )
   => ( ~ surjective(sK11,sK12,sK14)
      & ! [X6,X5] :
          ( ( ( apply(sK11,X5,X6)
              | ~ apply(sK10,X5,X6) )
            & ( apply(sK10,X5,X6)
              | ~ apply(sK11,X5,X6) ) )
          | ~ member(X6,sK14)
          | ~ member(X5,sK12) )
      & sK14 = image2(sK10,sK12)
      & subset(sK14,sK13)
      & maps(sK10,sK12,sK13) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f122,plain,
    ( ~ surjective(sK11,sK12,sK14)
    & ! [X5,X6] :
        ( ( ( apply(sK11,X5,X6)
            | ~ apply(sK10,X5,X6) )
          & ( apply(sK10,X5,X6)
            | ~ apply(sK11,X5,X6) ) )
        | ~ member(X6,sK14)
        | ~ member(X5,sK12) )
    & sK14 = image2(sK10,sK12)
    & subset(sK14,sK13)
    & maps(sK10,sK12,sK13) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK10,sK11,sK12,sK13,sK14])],[f120,f121]) ).

fof(f156,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( surjective(X0,X1,X2)
      | member(sK5(X0,X1,X2),X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f100]) ).

fof(f157,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1,X4] :
      ( surjective(X0,X1,X2)
      | ~ apply(X0,X4,sK5(X0,X1,X2))
      | ~ member(X4,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f100]) ).

fof(f160,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( member(sK6(X0,X1,X2),X1)
      | ~ member(X2,image2(X0,X1)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f105]) ).

fof(f161,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( apply(X0,sK6(X0,X1,X2),X2)
      | ~ member(X2,image2(X0,X1)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f105]) ).

fof(f176,plain,
    sK14 = image2(sK10,sK12),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f122]) ).

fof(f178,plain,
    ! [X6,X5] :
      ( apply(sK11,X5,X6)
      | ~ apply(sK10,X5,X6)
      | ~ member(X6,sK14)
      | ~ member(X5,sK12) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f122]) ).

fof(f179,plain,
    ~ surjective(sK11,sK12,sK14),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f122]) ).

cnf(c_82,plain,
    ( ~ apply(X0,X1,sK5(X0,X2,X3))
    | ~ member(X1,X2)
    | surjective(X0,X2,X3) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f157]) ).

cnf(c_83,plain,
    ( member(sK5(X0,X1,X2),X2)
    | surjective(X0,X1,X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f156]) ).

cnf(c_87,plain,
    ( ~ member(X0,image2(X1,X2))
    | apply(X1,sK6(X1,X2,X0),X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f161]) ).

cnf(c_88,plain,
    ( ~ member(X0,image2(X1,X2))
    | member(sK6(X1,X2,X0),X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f160]) ).

cnf(c_100,negated_conjecture,
    ~ surjective(sK11,sK12,sK14),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f179]) ).

cnf(c_101,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ apply(sK10,X0,X1)
    | ~ member(X0,sK12)
    | ~ member(X1,sK14)
    | apply(sK11,X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f178]) ).

cnf(c_103,negated_conjecture,
    image2(sK10,sK12) = sK14,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f176]) ).

cnf(c_229,plain,
    ( member(sK5(X0,X1,X2),X2)
    | surjective(X0,X1,X2) ),
    inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_83]) ).

cnf(c_924,plain,
    ( X0 != sK11
    | X1 != sK12
    | X2 != sK14
    | ~ apply(X0,X3,sK5(X0,X1,X2))
    | ~ member(X3,X1) ),
    inference(resolution_lifted,[status(thm)],[c_82,c_100]) ).

cnf(c_925,plain,
    ( ~ apply(sK11,X0,sK5(sK11,sK12,sK14))
    | ~ member(X0,sK12) ),
    inference(unflattening,[status(thm)],[c_924]) ).

cnf(c_933,plain,
    ( X0 != sK11
    | X1 != sK12
    | X2 != sK14
    | member(sK5(X0,X1,X2),X2) ),
    inference(resolution_lifted,[status(thm)],[c_229,c_100]) ).

cnf(c_934,plain,
    member(sK5(sK11,sK12,sK14),sK14),
    inference(unflattening,[status(thm)],[c_933]) ).

cnf(c_1141,plain,
    ( ~ member(X0,sK12)
    | ~ apply(sK11,X0,sK5(sK11,sK12,sK14)) ),
    inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_925]) ).

cnf(c_1142,plain,
    ( ~ apply(sK11,X0,sK5(sK11,sK12,sK14))
    | ~ member(X0,sK12) ),
    inference(renaming,[status(thm)],[c_1141]) ).

cnf(c_4236,plain,
    ( ~ member(sK6(sK10,X0,X1),sK12)
    | ~ member(X1,image2(sK10,X0))
    | ~ member(X1,sK14)
    | apply(sK11,sK6(sK10,X0,X1),X1) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_87,c_101]) ).

cnf(c_4450,plain,
    ( ~ member(sK6(sK10,X0,sK5(sK11,sK12,sK14)),sK12)
    | ~ member(sK5(sK11,sK12,sK14),image2(sK10,X0))
    | ~ member(sK5(sK11,sK12,sK14),sK14) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_4236,c_1142]) ).

cnf(c_4455,plain,
    ( ~ member(sK6(sK10,X0,sK5(sK11,sK12,sK14)),sK12)
    | ~ member(sK5(sK11,sK12,sK14),image2(sK10,X0)) ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_4450,c_934]) ).

cnf(c_4863,plain,
    ~ member(sK5(sK11,sK12,sK14),image2(sK10,sK12)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_88,c_4455]) ).

cnf(c_4864,plain,
    ~ member(sK5(sK11,sK12,sK14),sK14),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_4863,c_103]) ).

cnf(c_4865,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_4864,c_934]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.14  % Problem  : SET731+4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v2.2.1.
% 0.15/0.14  % Command  : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.15/0.36  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % DateTime : Sat Aug 26 14:10:14 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.22/0.50  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.22/0.50  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 3.63/1.19  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 3.63/1.19  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.63/1.19  
% 3.63/1.19  %---------------- iProver v3.8 (pre SMT-COMP 2023/CASC 2023) ----------------%
% 3.63/1.19  
% 3.63/1.19  ------  iProver source info
% 3.63/1.19  
% 3.63/1.19  git: date: 2023-05-31 18:12:56 +0000
% 3.63/1.19  git: sha1: 8abddc1f627fd3ce0bcb8b4cbf113b3cc443d7b6
% 3.63/1.19  git: non_committed_changes: false
% 3.63/1.19  git: last_make_outside_of_git: false
% 3.63/1.19  
% 3.63/1.19  ------ Parsing...
% 3.63/1.19  ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...
% 3.63/1.19  
% 3.63/1.19  ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe:1:0s pe:2:0s pe_e  sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 3 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e 
% 3.63/1.19  
% 3.63/1.19  ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e 
% 3.63/1.19  
% 3.63/1.19  ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 3.63/1.19  ------ Proving...
% 3.63/1.19  ------ Problem Properties 
% 3.63/1.19  
% 3.63/1.19  
% 3.63/1.19  clauses                                 55
% 3.63/1.19  conjectures                             4
% 3.63/1.19  EPR                                     6
% 3.63/1.19  Horn                                    50
% 3.63/1.19  unary                                   7
% 3.63/1.19  binary                                  28
% 3.63/1.19  lits                                    138
% 3.63/1.19  lits eq                                 5
% 3.63/1.19  fd_pure                                 0
% 3.63/1.19  fd_pseudo                               0
% 3.63/1.19  fd_cond                                 0
% 3.63/1.19  fd_pseudo_cond                          3
% 3.63/1.19  AC symbols                              0
% 3.63/1.19  
% 3.63/1.19  ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 3.63/1.19  
% 3.63/1.19  ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 3.63/1.19  
% 3.63/1.19  
% 3.63/1.19  ------ 
% 3.63/1.19  Current options:
% 3.63/1.19  ------ 
% 3.63/1.19  
% 3.63/1.19  
% 3.63/1.19  
% 3.63/1.19  
% 3.63/1.19  ------ Proving...
% 3.63/1.19  
% 3.63/1.19  
% 3.63/1.19  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.63/1.19  
% 3.63/1.19  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.63/1.19  
% 3.63/1.20  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------