TSTP Solution File: SET731+4 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : SET731+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.2.1.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 00:13:44 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 8.21s 2.46s
% Output : CNFRefutation 8.21s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 21 ( 9 unt; 2 nHn; 19 RR)
% Number of literals : 39 ( 2 equ; 18 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 4 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 32 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_42,plain,
( apply(X1,esk14_3(X1,X2,X3),X3)
| ~ member(X3,image2(X1,X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ptnuaca9/lgb.p',i_0_42) ).
cnf(i_0_132,negated_conjecture,
image2(esk41_0,esk43_0) = esk45_0,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ptnuaca9/lgb.p',i_0_132) ).
cnf(i_0_129,negated_conjecture,
~ surjective(esk42_0,esk43_0,esk45_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ptnuaca9/lgb.p',i_0_129) ).
cnf(i_0_126,plain,
( surjective(X1,X2,X3)
| member(esk40_3(X1,X2,X3),X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ptnuaca9/lgb.p',i_0_126) ).
cnf(i_0_43,plain,
( member(esk14_3(X1,X2,X3),X2)
| ~ member(X3,image2(X1,X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ptnuaca9/lgb.p',i_0_43) ).
cnf(i_0_130,negated_conjecture,
( apply(esk42_0,X1,X2)
| ~ member(X2,esk45_0)
| ~ member(X1,esk43_0)
| ~ apply(esk41_0,X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ptnuaca9/lgb.p',i_0_130) ).
cnf(i_0_125,plain,
( surjective(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ member(X4,X2)
| ~ apply(X1,X4,esk40_3(X1,X2,X3)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ptnuaca9/lgb.p',i_0_125) ).
cnf(c_0_140,plain,
( apply(X1,esk14_3(X1,X2,X3),X3)
| ~ member(X3,image2(X1,X2)) ),
i_0_42 ).
cnf(c_0_141,negated_conjecture,
image2(esk41_0,esk43_0) = esk45_0,
i_0_132 ).
cnf(c_0_142,negated_conjecture,
~ surjective(esk42_0,esk43_0,esk45_0),
i_0_129 ).
cnf(c_0_143,plain,
( surjective(X1,X2,X3)
| member(esk40_3(X1,X2,X3),X3) ),
i_0_126 ).
cnf(c_0_144,plain,
( member(esk14_3(X1,X2,X3),X2)
| ~ member(X3,image2(X1,X2)) ),
i_0_43 ).
cnf(c_0_145,negated_conjecture,
( apply(esk41_0,esk14_3(esk41_0,esk43_0,X1),X1)
| ~ member(X1,esk45_0) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_140,c_0_141]) ).
cnf(c_0_146,negated_conjecture,
member(esk40_3(esk42_0,esk43_0,esk45_0),esk45_0),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_142,c_0_143]) ).
cnf(c_0_147,negated_conjecture,
( member(esk14_3(esk41_0,esk43_0,X1),esk43_0)
| ~ member(X1,esk45_0) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_144,c_0_141]) ).
cnf(c_0_148,negated_conjecture,
( apply(esk42_0,X1,X2)
| ~ member(X2,esk45_0)
| ~ member(X1,esk43_0)
| ~ apply(esk41_0,X1,X2) ),
i_0_130 ).
cnf(c_0_149,negated_conjecture,
apply(esk41_0,esk14_3(esk41_0,esk43_0,esk40_3(esk42_0,esk43_0,esk45_0)),esk40_3(esk42_0,esk43_0,esk45_0)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_145,c_0_146]) ).
cnf(c_0_150,negated_conjecture,
member(esk14_3(esk41_0,esk43_0,esk40_3(esk42_0,esk43_0,esk45_0)),esk43_0),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_147,c_0_146]) ).
cnf(c_0_151,plain,
( surjective(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ member(X4,X2)
| ~ apply(X1,X4,esk40_3(X1,X2,X3)) ),
i_0_125 ).
cnf(c_0_152,negated_conjecture,
apply(esk42_0,esk14_3(esk41_0,esk43_0,esk40_3(esk42_0,esk43_0,esk45_0)),esk40_3(esk42_0,esk43_0,esk45_0)),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_148,c_0_149]),c_0_146]),c_0_150])]) ).
cnf(c_0_153,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_151,c_0_152]),c_0_150])]),c_0_142]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : SET731+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.2.1.
% 0.00/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sun Jul 10 22:42:43 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.44 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.18/0.45 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.45 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.18/0.45 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.18/0.45 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 8.21/2.46 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 8.21/2.46 # No SInE strategy applied
% 8.21/2.46 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 8.21/2.46 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2mI
% 8.21/2.46 # and selection function SelectCQArNTNpEqFirst.
% 8.21/2.46 #
% 8.21/2.46 # Preprocessing time : 0.025 s
% 8.21/2.46 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 8.21/2.46
% 8.21/2.46 # Proof found!
% 8.21/2.46 # SZS status Theorem
% 8.21/2.46 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 8.21/2.46 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 8.21/2.46
% 8.21/2.46 # -------------------------------------------------
% 8.21/2.46 # User time : 0.044 s
% 8.21/2.46 # System time : 0.007 s
% 8.21/2.46 # Total time : 0.051 s
% 8.21/2.46 # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 8.21/2.46
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------