TSTP Solution File: SET715+4 by Enigma---0.5.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : SET715+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.2.1.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 00:13:37 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 8.51s 2.41s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 8.51s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   27 (   9 unt;   2 nHn;  25 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   64 (   0 equ;  39 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   5 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   3 con; 0-5 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   63 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_110,plain,
    ( surjective(X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ one_to_one(X1,X2,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-uvgvkb5p/lgb.p',i_0_110) ).

cnf(i_0_130,negated_conjecture,
    one_to_one(esk41_0,esk42_0,esk43_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-uvgvkb5p/lgb.p',i_0_130) ).

cnf(i_0_127,plain,
    ( apply(X1,esk39_4(X1,X2,X3,X4),X4)
    | ~ member(X4,X3)
    | ~ surjective(X1,X2,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-uvgvkb5p/lgb.p',i_0_127) ).

cnf(i_0_129,negated_conjecture,
    ~ identity(compose_function(esk41_0,inverse_function(esk41_0,esk42_0,esk43_0),esk43_0,esk42_0,esk43_0),esk43_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-uvgvkb5p/lgb.p',i_0_129) ).

cnf(i_0_39,plain,
    ( identity(X1,X2)
    | member(esk13_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-uvgvkb5p/lgb.p',i_0_39) ).

cnf(i_0_1,plain,
    ( apply(compose_function(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5),X6,X7)
    | ~ member(X7,X5)
    | ~ member(X6,X3)
    | ~ member(X8,X4)
    | ~ apply(X1,X8,X7)
    | ~ apply(X2,X6,X8) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-uvgvkb5p/lgb.p',i_0_1) ).

cnf(i_0_38,plain,
    ( identity(X1,X2)
    | ~ apply(X1,esk13_2(X1,X2),esk13_2(X1,X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-uvgvkb5p/lgb.p',i_0_38) ).

cnf(i_0_68,plain,
    ( apply(inverse_function(X1,X2,X3),X4,X5)
    | ~ member(X4,X3)
    | ~ member(X5,X2)
    | ~ apply(X1,X5,X4) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-uvgvkb5p/lgb.p',i_0_68) ).

cnf(i_0_128,plain,
    ( member(esk39_4(X1,X2,X3,X4),X2)
    | ~ member(X4,X3)
    | ~ surjective(X1,X2,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-uvgvkb5p/lgb.p',i_0_128) ).

cnf(c_0_140,plain,
    ( surjective(X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ one_to_one(X1,X2,X3) ),
    i_0_110 ).

cnf(c_0_141,negated_conjecture,
    one_to_one(esk41_0,esk42_0,esk43_0),
    i_0_130 ).

cnf(c_0_142,plain,
    ( apply(X1,esk39_4(X1,X2,X3,X4),X4)
    | ~ member(X4,X3)
    | ~ surjective(X1,X2,X3) ),
    i_0_127 ).

cnf(c_0_143,negated_conjecture,
    surjective(esk41_0,esk42_0,esk43_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_140,c_0_141]) ).

cnf(c_0_144,negated_conjecture,
    ~ identity(compose_function(esk41_0,inverse_function(esk41_0,esk42_0,esk43_0),esk43_0,esk42_0,esk43_0),esk43_0),
    i_0_129 ).

cnf(c_0_145,plain,
    ( identity(X1,X2)
    | member(esk13_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
    i_0_39 ).

cnf(c_0_146,negated_conjecture,
    ( apply(esk41_0,esk39_4(esk41_0,esk42_0,esk43_0,X1),X1)
    | ~ member(X1,esk43_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_142,c_0_143]) ).

cnf(c_0_147,negated_conjecture,
    member(esk13_2(compose_function(esk41_0,inverse_function(esk41_0,esk42_0,esk43_0),esk43_0,esk42_0,esk43_0),esk43_0),esk43_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_144,c_0_145]) ).

cnf(c_0_148,plain,
    ( apply(compose_function(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5),X6,X7)
    | ~ member(X7,X5)
    | ~ member(X6,X3)
    | ~ member(X8,X4)
    | ~ apply(X1,X8,X7)
    | ~ apply(X2,X6,X8) ),
    i_0_1 ).

cnf(c_0_149,negated_conjecture,
    apply(esk41_0,esk39_4(esk41_0,esk42_0,esk43_0,esk13_2(compose_function(esk41_0,inverse_function(esk41_0,esk42_0,esk43_0),esk43_0,esk42_0,esk43_0),esk43_0)),esk13_2(compose_function(esk41_0,inverse_function(esk41_0,esk42_0,esk43_0),esk43_0,esk42_0,esk43_0),esk43_0)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_146,c_0_147]) ).

cnf(c_0_150,plain,
    ( identity(X1,X2)
    | ~ apply(X1,esk13_2(X1,X2),esk13_2(X1,X2)) ),
    i_0_38 ).

cnf(c_0_151,plain,
    ( apply(compose_function(esk41_0,X1,X2,X3,X4),X5,esk13_2(compose_function(esk41_0,inverse_function(esk41_0,esk42_0,esk43_0),esk43_0,esk42_0,esk43_0),esk43_0))
    | ~ member(esk39_4(esk41_0,esk42_0,esk43_0,esk13_2(compose_function(esk41_0,inverse_function(esk41_0,esk42_0,esk43_0),esk43_0,esk42_0,esk43_0),esk43_0)),X3)
    | ~ member(esk13_2(compose_function(esk41_0,inverse_function(esk41_0,esk42_0,esk43_0),esk43_0,esk42_0,esk43_0),esk43_0),X4)
    | ~ member(X5,X2)
    | ~ apply(X1,X5,esk39_4(esk41_0,esk42_0,esk43_0,esk13_2(compose_function(esk41_0,inverse_function(esk41_0,esk42_0,esk43_0),esk43_0,esk42_0,esk43_0),esk43_0))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_148,c_0_149]) ).

cnf(c_0_152,plain,
    ( ~ member(esk39_4(esk41_0,esk42_0,esk43_0,esk13_2(compose_function(esk41_0,inverse_function(esk41_0,esk42_0,esk43_0),esk43_0,esk42_0,esk43_0),esk43_0)),esk42_0)
    | ~ apply(inverse_function(esk41_0,esk42_0,esk43_0),esk13_2(compose_function(esk41_0,inverse_function(esk41_0,esk42_0,esk43_0),esk43_0,esk42_0,esk43_0),esk43_0),esk39_4(esk41_0,esk42_0,esk43_0,esk13_2(compose_function(esk41_0,inverse_function(esk41_0,esk42_0,esk43_0),esk43_0,esk42_0,esk43_0),esk43_0))) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_150,c_0_151]),c_0_147])]),c_0_144]) ).

cnf(c_0_153,plain,
    ( apply(inverse_function(X1,X2,X3),X4,X5)
    | ~ member(X4,X3)
    | ~ member(X5,X2)
    | ~ apply(X1,X5,X4) ),
    i_0_68 ).

cnf(c_0_154,plain,
    ( member(esk39_4(X1,X2,X3,X4),X2)
    | ~ member(X4,X3)
    | ~ surjective(X1,X2,X3) ),
    i_0_128 ).

cnf(c_0_155,plain,
    ~ member(esk39_4(esk41_0,esk42_0,esk43_0,esk13_2(compose_function(esk41_0,inverse_function(esk41_0,esk42_0,esk43_0),esk43_0,esk42_0,esk43_0),esk43_0)),esk42_0),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_152,c_0_153]),c_0_147]),c_0_149])]) ).

cnf(c_0_156,negated_conjecture,
    ( member(esk39_4(esk41_0,esk42_0,esk43_0,X1),esk42_0)
    | ~ member(X1,esk43_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_154,c_0_143]) ).

cnf(c_0_157,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_155,c_0_156]),c_0_147])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : SET715+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.2.1.
% 0.03/0.12  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 01:16:09 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.44  # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.19/0.45  # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.45  # Filter: axfilter_auto   0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   0.p
% 0.19/0.45  # Filter: axfilter_auto   1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   1.p
% 0.19/0.45  # Filter: axfilter_auto   2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   2.p
% 8.51/2.41  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 8.51/2.41  # No SInE strategy applied
% 8.51/2.41  # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 8.51/2.41  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S088I
% 8.51/2.41  # and selection function SelectCQArNTEqFirstUnlessPDom.
% 8.51/2.41  #
% 8.51/2.41  # Preprocessing time       : 0.023 s
% 8.51/2.41  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 8.51/2.41  
% 8.51/2.41  # Proof found!
% 8.51/2.41  # SZS status Theorem
% 8.51/2.41  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 8.51/2.41  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 8.51/2.41  
% 8.51/2.41  # -------------------------------------------------
% 8.51/2.41  # User time                : 0.083 s
% 8.51/2.41  # System time              : 0.009 s
% 8.51/2.41  # Total time               : 0.092 s
% 8.51/2.41  # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 8.51/2.41  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------