TSTP Solution File: SET705+4 by CSE_E---1.5
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE_E---1.5
% Problem : SET705+4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 14:35:18 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.22s 0.61s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.22s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 19
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 30 ( 7 unt; 16 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 29 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 7 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 26 ( 11 ~; 9 |; 3 &)
% ( 2 <=>; 1 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 10 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 24 ( 14 >; 10 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 13 ( 13 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 21 ( 0 sgn; 14 !; 0 ?; 0 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(decl_22,type,
subset: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(decl_23,type,
member: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(decl_24,type,
equal_set: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(decl_25,type,
power_set: $i > $i ).
tff(decl_26,type,
intersection: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_27,type,
union: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_28,type,
empty_set: $i ).
tff(decl_29,type,
difference: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_30,type,
singleton: $i > $i ).
tff(decl_31,type,
unordered_pair: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_32,type,
sum: $i > $i ).
tff(decl_33,type,
product: $i > $i ).
tff(decl_34,type,
esk1_2: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_35,type,
esk2_2: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_36,type,
esk3_2: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_37,type,
esk4_0: $i ).
fof(thI48,conjecture,
! [X1] : member(X1,power_set(X1)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',thI48) ).
fof(power_set,axiom,
! [X3,X1] :
( member(X3,power_set(X1))
<=> subset(X3,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET006+0.ax',power_set) ).
fof(subset,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( subset(X1,X2)
<=> ! [X3] :
( member(X3,X1)
=> member(X3,X2) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET006+0.ax',subset) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1] : member(X1,power_set(X1)),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[thI48]) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ member(esk4_0,power_set(esk4_0)),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])]) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
! [X14,X15] :
( ( ~ member(X14,power_set(X15))
| subset(X14,X15) )
& ( ~ subset(X14,X15)
| member(X14,power_set(X15)) ) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[power_set])]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X6,X7,X8,X9,X10] :
( ( ~ subset(X6,X7)
| ~ member(X8,X6)
| member(X8,X7) )
& ( member(esk1_2(X9,X10),X9)
| subset(X9,X10) )
& ( ~ member(esk1_2(X9,X10),X10)
| subset(X9,X10) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[subset])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ member(esk4_0,power_set(esk4_0)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( member(X1,power_set(X2))
| ~ subset(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( subset(X1,X2)
| ~ member(esk1_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( member(esk1_2(X1,X2),X1)
| subset(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
~ subset(esk4_0,esk4_0),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
subset(X1,X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.14 % Problem : SET705+4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.14/0.15 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.14/0.36 % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36 % DateTime : Sat Aug 26 09:32:38 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.22/0.59 start to proof: theBenchmark
% 0.22/0.61 % Version : CSE_E---1.5
% 0.22/0.61 % Problem : theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/0.61 % Proof found
% 0.22/0.61 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/0.61 % SZS output start Proof
% See solution above
% 0.22/0.61 % Total time : 0.010000 s
% 0.22/0.61 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.22/0.61 % Total time : 0.012000 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------