TSTP Solution File: SET695+4 by SuperZenon---0.0.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SuperZenon---0.0.1
% Problem : SET695+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_super_zenon -p0 -itptp -om -max-time %d %s
% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 05:43:26 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.19s 0.40s
% Output : Proof 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11 % Problem : SET695+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : run_super_zenon -p0 -itptp -om -max-time %d %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sun Jul 10 00:14:46 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.40 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.19/0.40 (* PROOF-FOUND *)
% 0.19/0.40 (* BEGIN-PROOF *)
% 0.19/0.40 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.19/0.40 1. (member T_0 T_1) (-. (member T_0 T_1)) ### Axiom
% 0.19/0.40 2. (-. (member T_0 T_2)) (member T_0 T_2) ### Axiom
% 0.19/0.40 3. (subset T_1 T_2) (-. (member T_0 T_2)) (member T_0 T_1) ### Extension/test/subset_inst 1 2
% 0.19/0.40 4. (-. (member T_0 T_3)) (member T_0 T_3) ### Axiom
% 0.19/0.40 5. (-. (member T_0 (difference T_2 T_3))) (-. (member T_0 T_3)) (member T_0 T_1) (subset T_1 T_2) ### Extension/test/not_difference 3 4
% 0.19/0.40 6. (member T_0 T_1) (-. (member T_0 T_1)) ### Axiom
% 0.19/0.40 7. (member T_0 (difference T_2 T_1)) (member T_0 T_1) ### Extension/test/difference 6
% 0.19/0.40 8. (subset (difference T_2 T_3) (difference T_2 T_1)) (subset T_1 T_2) (member T_0 T_1) (-. (member T_0 T_3)) ### Extension/test/subset_inst 5 7
% 0.19/0.40 9. (-. (subset T_1 T_3)) (subset T_1 T_2) (subset (difference T_2 T_3) (difference T_2 T_1)) ### Extension/test/not_subset 8
% 0.19/0.40 10. (member T_4 T_2) (-. (member T_4 T_2)) ### Axiom
% 0.19/0.40 11. (member T_4 T_1) (-. (member T_4 T_1)) ### Axiom
% 0.19/0.40 12. (-. (member T_4 T_3)) (member T_4 T_3) ### Axiom
% 0.19/0.40 13. (subset T_1 T_3) (-. (member T_4 T_3)) (member T_4 T_1) ### Extension/test/subset_inst 11 12
% 0.19/0.40 14. (-. (member T_4 (difference T_2 T_1))) (-. (member T_4 T_3)) (subset T_1 T_3) (member T_4 T_2) ### Extension/test/not_difference 10 13
% 0.19/0.40 15. (member T_4 (difference T_2 T_3)) (subset T_1 T_3) (-. (member T_4 (difference T_2 T_1))) ### Extension/test/difference 14
% 0.19/0.40 16. (-. (subset (difference T_2 T_3) (difference T_2 T_1))) (subset T_1 T_3) ### Extension/test/not_subset 15
% 0.19/0.40 17. (-. ((subset T_1 T_3) <=> (subset (difference T_2 T_3) (difference T_2 T_1)))) (subset T_1 T_2) ### NotEquiv 9 16
% 0.19/0.40 18. (-. (((subset T_1 T_2) /\ (subset T_3 T_2)) => ((subset T_1 T_3) <=> (subset (difference T_2 T_3) (difference T_2 T_1))))) ### ConjTree 17
% 0.19/0.40 19. (-. (All E, (((subset T_1 E) /\ (subset T_3 E)) => ((subset T_1 T_3) <=> (subset (difference E T_3) (difference E T_1)))))) ### NotAllEx 18
% 0.19/0.40 20. (-. (All B, (All E, (((subset T_1 E) /\ (subset B E)) => ((subset T_1 B) <=> (subset (difference E B) (difference E T_1))))))) ### NotAllEx 19
% 0.19/0.40 21. (-. (All A, (All B, (All E, (((subset A E) /\ (subset B E)) => ((subset A B) <=> (subset (difference E B) (difference E A)))))))) ### NotAllEx 20
% 0.19/0.40 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.19/0.40 (* END-PROOF *)
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------