TSTP Solution File: SET694+4 by ET---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : SET694+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 00:53:12 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.43s 43.60s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.43s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   12
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   36 (   8 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   83 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   74 (  27   ~;  38   |;   5   &)
%                                         (   3 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   11 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   93 (  15 sgn  27   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(power_set,axiom,
    ! [X3,X1] :
      ( member(X3,power_set(X1))
    <=> subset(X3,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET006+0.ax',power_set) ).

fof(subset,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( subset(X1,X2)
    <=> ! [X3] :
          ( member(X3,X1)
         => member(X3,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET006+0.ax',subset) ).

fof(union,axiom,
    ! [X3,X1,X2] :
      ( member(X3,union(X1,X2))
    <=> ( member(X3,X1)
        | member(X3,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET006+0.ax',union) ).

fof(thI22,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2] : subset(union(power_set(X1),power_set(X2)),power_set(union(X1,X2))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',thI22) ).

fof(c_0_4,plain,
    ! [X4,X5,X4,X5] :
      ( ( ~ member(X4,power_set(X5))
        | subset(X4,X5) )
      & ( ~ subset(X4,X5)
        | member(X4,power_set(X5)) ) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[power_set])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X4,X5,X6,X4,X5] :
      ( ( ~ subset(X4,X5)
        | ~ member(X6,X4)
        | member(X6,X5) )
      & ( member(esk3_2(X4,X5),X4)
        | subset(X4,X5) )
      & ( ~ member(esk3_2(X4,X5),X5)
        | subset(X4,X5) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[subset])])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,plain,
    ( subset(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X1,power_set(X2)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,plain,
    ( subset(X1,X2)
    | member(esk3_2(X1,X2),X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X4,X5,X6,X4,X5,X6] :
      ( ( ~ member(X4,union(X5,X6))
        | member(X4,X5)
        | member(X4,X6) )
      & ( ~ member(X4,X5)
        | member(X4,union(X5,X6)) )
      & ( ~ member(X4,X6)
        | member(X4,union(X5,X6)) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[union])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    ( member(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X1,X3)
    | ~ subset(X3,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( subset(esk3_2(power_set(X1),X2),X1)
    | subset(power_set(X1),X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( subset(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(esk3_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( member(X1,union(X2,X3))
    | ~ member(X1,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( member(X1,X2)
    | subset(power_set(X2),X3)
    | ~ member(X1,esk3_2(power_set(X2),X3)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( member(X1,union(X2,X3))
    | ~ member(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( member(X1,power_set(X2))
    | ~ subset(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( subset(X1,union(X2,X3))
    | ~ member(esk3_2(X1,union(X2,X3)),X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( member(esk3_2(esk3_2(power_set(X1),X2),X3),X1)
    | subset(esk3_2(power_set(X1),X2),X3)
    | subset(power_set(X1),X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( subset(X1,union(X2,X3))
    | ~ member(esk3_2(X1,union(X2,X3)),X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( subset(X1,power_set(X2))
    | ~ subset(esk3_2(X1,power_set(X2)),X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( subset(esk3_2(power_set(X1),X2),union(X3,X1))
    | subset(power_set(X1),X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( subset(esk3_2(power_set(X1),X2),union(X1,X3))
    | subset(power_set(X1),X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    subset(power_set(X1),power_set(union(X2,X1))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    subset(power_set(X1),power_set(union(X1,X2))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( member(X1,power_set(union(X2,X3)))
    | ~ member(X1,power_set(X3)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( member(X1,X2)
    | member(X1,X3)
    | ~ member(X1,union(X3,X2)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

fof(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2] : subset(union(power_set(X1),power_set(X2)),power_set(union(X1,X2))),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[thI22]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    ( member(X1,power_set(union(X2,X3)))
    | ~ member(X1,power_set(X2)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    ( subset(X1,power_set(union(X2,X3)))
    | ~ member(esk3_2(X1,power_set(union(X2,X3))),power_set(X3)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    ( member(esk3_2(union(X1,X2),X3),X1)
    | member(esk3_2(union(X1,X2),X3),X2)
    | subset(union(X1,X2),X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_7]) ).

fof(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    ~ subset(union(power_set(esk1_0),power_set(esk2_0)),power_set(union(esk1_0,esk2_0))),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_26])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    ( subset(X1,power_set(union(X2,X3)))
    | ~ member(esk3_2(X1,power_set(union(X2,X3))),power_set(X2)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    ( member(esk3_2(union(X1,power_set(X2)),power_set(union(X3,X2))),X1)
    | subset(union(X1,power_set(X2)),power_set(union(X3,X2))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
    ~ subset(union(power_set(esk1_0),power_set(esk2_0)),power_set(union(esk1_0,esk2_0))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    subset(union(power_set(X1),power_set(X2)),power_set(union(X1,X2))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_34])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : SET694+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.11/0.13  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.33  % DateTime : Sun Jul 10 09:15:01 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.34/23.40  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.34/23.40  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.34/23.40  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.34/23.41  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.43/43.60  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_2d86bd69119e7e9cc4417c0ee581499eaf828bb2 for 23 seconds:
% 0.43/43.60  
% 0.43/43.60  # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 0.43/43.60  # OLD status Res
% 0.43/43.60  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,,1.1,,02,500,1.0)
% 0.43/43.60  # Preprocessing time       : 0.014 s
% 0.43/43.60  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_230b6c199cce1dcf6700db59e75a93feb83d1bd9 for 23 seconds:
% 0.43/43.60  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.1,,01,20000,1.0)
% 0.43/43.60  # Preprocessing time       : 0.007 s
% 0.43/43.60  
% 0.43/43.60  # Proof found!
% 0.43/43.60  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.43/43.60  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.43/43.61  # Proof object total steps             : 36
% 0.43/43.61  # Proof object clause steps            : 27
% 0.43/43.61  # Proof object formula steps           : 9
% 0.43/43.61  # Proof object conjectures             : 5
% 0.43/43.61  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 2
% 0.43/43.61  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 0.43/43.61  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 9
% 0.43/43.61  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 4
% 0.43/43.61  # Proof object generating inferences   : 17
% 0.43/43.61  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 2
% 0.43/43.61  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.43/43.61  # Parsed axioms                        : 12
% 0.43/43.61  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 8
% 0.43/43.61  # Initial clauses                      : 9
% 0.43/43.61  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.43/43.61  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 9
% 0.43/43.61  # Processed clauses                    : 19750
% 0.43/43.61  # ...of these trivial                  : 887
% 0.43/43.61  # ...subsumed                          : 10430
% 0.43/43.61  # ...remaining for further processing  : 8433
% 0.43/43.61  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.43/43.61  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 902630
% 0.43/43.61  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.43/43.61  # Backward-rewritten                   : 1
% 0.43/43.61  # Generated clauses                    : 1031735
% 0.43/43.61  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 1029651
% 0.43/43.61  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 20
% 0.43/43.61  # Paramodulations                      : 1030605
% 0.43/43.61  # Factorizations                       : 1130
% 0.43/43.61  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.43/43.61  # Current number of processed clauses  : 8432
% 0.43/43.61  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 6217
% 0.43/43.61  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.43/43.61  #    Negative unit clauses             : 4
% 0.43/43.61  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 2211
% 0.43/43.61  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 107280
% 0.43/43.61  # ...number of literals in the above   : 231418
% 0.43/43.61  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.43/43.61  # Current number of archived clauses   : 1
% 0.43/43.61  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1235575
% 0.43/43.61  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 761249
% 0.43/43.61  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 10450
% 0.43/43.61  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1682386
% 0.43/43.61  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.43/43.61  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 3088642
% 0.43/43.61  # BW rewrite match successes           : 1
% 0.43/43.61  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.43/43.61  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.43/43.61  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 35160854
% 0.43/43.61  
% 0.43/43.61  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.43/43.61  # User time                : 19.889 s
% 0.43/43.61  # System time              : 0.124 s
% 0.43/43.61  # Total time               : 20.013 s
% 0.43/43.61  # Maximum resident set size: 154172 pages
% 0.43/46.42  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.43/46.42  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.43/46.42  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.43/46.44  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.43/46.44  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.43/46.44  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.43/46.44  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.43/46.44  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.43/46.44  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.43/46.44  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.43/46.44  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.43/46.44  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.43/46.44  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.43/46.45  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.43/46.45  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.43/46.45  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.43/46.45  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.43/46.45  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.43/46.45  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.43/46.45  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.43/46.45  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.43/46.45  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.43/46.45  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.43/46.45  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.43/46.45  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.43/46.46  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.43/46.46  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.43/46.46  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.43/46.46  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.43/46.46  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.43/46.46  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.43/46.46  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.43/46.46  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.43/46.46  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.43/46.46  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.43/46.46  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.43/46.46  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.43/46.47  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.43/46.47  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.43/46.47  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.43/46.47  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.43/46.47  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.43/46.47  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.43/46.47  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.43/46.47  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.43/46.47  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.43/46.47  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.43/46.47  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.43/46.47  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.43/46.47  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.43/46.47  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.43/46.48  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.43/46.48  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.43/46.48  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.43/46.48  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.43/46.48  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.43/46.48  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.43/46.48  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.43/46.48  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.43/46.48  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.43/46.48  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.43/46.49  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.43/46.49  eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------