TSTP Solution File: SET688+4 by SRASS---0.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SRASS---0.1
% Problem  : SET688+4 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : SRASS -q2 -a 0 10 10 10 -i3 -n60 %s

% Computer : art06.cs.miami.edu
% Model    : i686 i686
% CPU      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory   : 2018MB
% OS       : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Dec 29 23:29:55 EST 2010

% Result   : Theorem 0.88s
% Output   : Solution 0.88s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ERROR: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Reading problem from /tmp/SystemOnTPTP8494/SET688+4.tptp
% Adding relevance values
% Extracting the conjecture
% Sorting axioms by relevance
% Looking for THM       ... found
% SZS status THM for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP8494/SET688+4.tptp
% SZS output start Solution for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP8494/SET688+4.tptp
% TreeLimitedRun: ----------------------------------------------------------
% TreeLimitedRun: /home/graph/tptp/Systems/EP---1.2/eproof --print-statistics -xAuto -tAuto --cpu-limit=60 --proof-time-unlimited --memory-limit=Auto --tstp-in --tstp-out /tmp/SRASS.s.p 
% TreeLimitedRun: CPU time limit is 60s
% TreeLimitedRun: WC  time limit is 120s
% TreeLimitedRun: PID is 8590
% TreeLimitedRun: ----------------------------------------------------------
% PrfWatch: 0.00 CPU 0.00 WC
% # Preprocessing time     : 0.014 s
% # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% # SZS status Theorem
% # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% fof(1, axiom,![X1]:![X2]:(equal_set(X1,X2)<=>(subset(X1,X2)&subset(X2,X1))),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', equal_set)).
% fof(2, axiom,![X1]:![X2]:(subset(X1,X2)<=>![X3]:(member(X3,X1)=>member(X3,X2))),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', subset)).
% fof(12, conjecture,![X1]:![X2]:![X6]:((((subset(X1,X2)&~(equal_set(X1,X2)))&subset(X2,X6))&~(equal_set(X2,X6)))=>~(equal_set(X1,X6))),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', thI04)).
% fof(13, negated_conjecture,~(![X1]:![X2]:![X6]:((((subset(X1,X2)&~(equal_set(X1,X2)))&subset(X2,X6))&~(equal_set(X2,X6)))=>~(equal_set(X1,X6)))),inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[12])).
% fof(16, negated_conjecture,~(![X1]:![X2]:![X6]:((((subset(X1,X2)&~(equal_set(X1,X2)))&subset(X2,X6))&~(equal_set(X2,X6)))=>~(equal_set(X1,X6)))),inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[13,theory(equality)])).
% fof(17, plain,![X1]:![X2]:((~(equal_set(X1,X2))|(subset(X1,X2)&subset(X2,X1)))&((~(subset(X1,X2))|~(subset(X2,X1)))|equal_set(X1,X2))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[1])).
% fof(18, plain,![X3]:![X4]:((~(equal_set(X3,X4))|(subset(X3,X4)&subset(X4,X3)))&((~(subset(X3,X4))|~(subset(X4,X3)))|equal_set(X3,X4))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[17])).
% fof(19, plain,![X3]:![X4]:(((subset(X3,X4)|~(equal_set(X3,X4)))&(subset(X4,X3)|~(equal_set(X3,X4))))&((~(subset(X3,X4))|~(subset(X4,X3)))|equal_set(X3,X4))),inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[18])).
% cnf(20,plain,(equal_set(X1,X2)|~subset(X2,X1)|~subset(X1,X2)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[19])).
% cnf(21,plain,(subset(X2,X1)|~equal_set(X1,X2)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[19])).
% fof(23, plain,![X1]:![X2]:((~(subset(X1,X2))|![X3]:(~(member(X3,X1))|member(X3,X2)))&(?[X3]:(member(X3,X1)&~(member(X3,X2)))|subset(X1,X2))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[2])).
% fof(24, plain,![X4]:![X5]:((~(subset(X4,X5))|![X6]:(~(member(X6,X4))|member(X6,X5)))&(?[X7]:(member(X7,X4)&~(member(X7,X5)))|subset(X4,X5))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[23])).
% fof(25, plain,![X4]:![X5]:((~(subset(X4,X5))|![X6]:(~(member(X6,X4))|member(X6,X5)))&((member(esk1_2(X4,X5),X4)&~(member(esk1_2(X4,X5),X5)))|subset(X4,X5))),inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[24])).
% fof(26, plain,![X4]:![X5]:![X6]:(((~(member(X6,X4))|member(X6,X5))|~(subset(X4,X5)))&((member(esk1_2(X4,X5),X4)&~(member(esk1_2(X4,X5),X5)))|subset(X4,X5))),inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[25])).
% fof(27, plain,![X4]:![X5]:![X6]:(((~(member(X6,X4))|member(X6,X5))|~(subset(X4,X5)))&((member(esk1_2(X4,X5),X4)|subset(X4,X5))&(~(member(esk1_2(X4,X5),X5))|subset(X4,X5)))),inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[26])).
% cnf(28,plain,(subset(X1,X2)|~member(esk1_2(X1,X2),X2)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[27])).
% cnf(29,plain,(subset(X1,X2)|member(esk1_2(X1,X2),X1)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[27])).
% cnf(30,plain,(member(X3,X2)|~subset(X1,X2)|~member(X3,X1)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[27])).
% fof(81, negated_conjecture,?[X1]:?[X2]:?[X6]:((((subset(X1,X2)&~(equal_set(X1,X2)))&subset(X2,X6))&~(equal_set(X2,X6)))&equal_set(X1,X6)),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[16])).
% fof(82, negated_conjecture,?[X7]:?[X8]:?[X9]:((((subset(X7,X8)&~(equal_set(X7,X8)))&subset(X8,X9))&~(equal_set(X8,X9)))&equal_set(X7,X9)),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[81])).
% fof(83, negated_conjecture,((((subset(esk4_0,esk5_0)&~(equal_set(esk4_0,esk5_0)))&subset(esk5_0,esk6_0))&~(equal_set(esk5_0,esk6_0)))&equal_set(esk4_0,esk6_0)),inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[82])).
% cnf(84,negated_conjecture,(equal_set(esk4_0,esk6_0)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[83])).
% cnf(85,negated_conjecture,(~equal_set(esk5_0,esk6_0)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[83])).
% cnf(86,negated_conjecture,(subset(esk5_0,esk6_0)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[83])).
% cnf(88,negated_conjecture,(subset(esk4_0,esk5_0)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[83])).
% cnf(92,negated_conjecture,(subset(esk6_0,esk4_0)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[21,84,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(99,negated_conjecture,(~subset(esk6_0,esk5_0)|~subset(esk5_0,esk6_0)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[85,20,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(100,negated_conjecture,(~subset(esk6_0,esk5_0)|$false),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[99,86,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(101,negated_conjecture,(~subset(esk6_0,esk5_0)),inference(cn,[status(thm)],[100,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(114,negated_conjecture,(member(X1,esk5_0)|~member(X1,esk4_0)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[30,88,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(159,negated_conjecture,(member(X1,esk4_0)|~member(X1,esk6_0)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[30,92,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(216,negated_conjecture,(member(X1,esk5_0)|~member(X1,esk6_0)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[114,159,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(261,negated_conjecture,(member(esk1_2(esk6_0,X1),esk5_0)|subset(esk6_0,X1)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[216,29,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(265,negated_conjecture,(subset(esk6_0,esk5_0)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[28,261,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(266,negated_conjecture,($false),inference(sr,[status(thm)],[265,101,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(267,negated_conjecture,($false),266,['proof']).
% # SZS output end CNFRefutation
% # Processed clauses                  : 118
% # ...of these trivial                : 0
% # ...subsumed                        : 5
% # ...remaining for further processing: 113
% # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 3
% # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% # Backward-subsumed                  : 0
% # Backward-rewritten                 : 1
% # Generated clauses                  : 164
% # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 143
% # Contextual simplify-reflections    : 0
% # Paramodulations                    : 161
% # Factorizations                     : 0
% # Equation resolutions               : 3
% # Current number of processed clauses: 75
% #    Positive orientable unit clauses: 28
% #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% #    Negative unit clauses           : 8
% #    Non-unit-clauses                : 39
% # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 75
% # ...number of literals in the above : 179
% # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 44
% # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 44
% # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 12
% # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound  : 0
% # Indexed BW rewrite attempts        : 34
% # Indexed BW rewrite successes       : 1
% # Backwards rewriting index:    91 leaves,   1.36+/-0.734 terms/leaf
% # Paramod-from index:           35 leaves,   1.26+/-0.690 terms/leaf
% # Paramod-into index:           80 leaves,   1.32+/-0.648 terms/leaf
% # -------------------------------------------------
% # User time              : 0.020 s
% # System time            : 0.003 s
% # Total time             : 0.023 s
% # Maximum resident set size: 0 pages
% PrfWatch: 0.10 CPU 0.19 WC
% FINAL PrfWatch: 0.10 CPU 0.19 WC
% SZS output end Solution for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP8494/SET688+4.tptp
% 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------