TSTP Solution File: SET686+3 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : SET686+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 05:20:04 EDT 2022
% Result : Unknown 0.49s 0.69s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SET686+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sun Jul 10 03:39:42 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.38 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.20/0.38 The process was started by sandbox2 on n018.cluster.edu,
% 0.20/0.38 Sun Jul 10 03:39:42 2022
% 0.20/0.38 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 14325.
% 0.20/0.38
% 0.20/0.38 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.20/0.38 set(auto).
% 0.20/0.38 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.20/0.38 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.20/0.38 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.20/0.38 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.20/0.38 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.20/0.38 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.20/0.38 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.20/0.38 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.20/0.38 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.20/0.38 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.20/0.38 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.20/0.38 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.20/0.38 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.20/0.38 clear(print_given).
% 0.20/0.38
% 0.20/0.38 formula_list(usable).
% 0.20/0.38
% 0.20/0.38 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=7.
% 0.20/0.38
% 0.20/0.38 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.20/0.38 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.20/0.38 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.20/0.38 clauses in usable.
% 0.20/0.38
% 0.20/0.38 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.20/0.38 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.20/0.38 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.20/0.38 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.20/0.38 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.20/0.38 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.20/0.38 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.20/0.38 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.20/0.38 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.20/0.38 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.20/0.38 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.20/0.38 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.20/0.38 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.20/0.38 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.20/0.38 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.20/0.38
% 0.20/0.38 ------------> process usable:
% 0.20/0.38 Following clause subsumed by 25 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -ilf_type(A,set_type)| -ilf_type(B,set_type)|A=B|ilf_type($f6(A,B),set_type).
% 0.20/0.38 Following clause subsumed by 25 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -ilf_type(A,set_type)| -ilf_type(B,set_type)|member(A,power_set(B))|ilf_type($f7(A,B),set_type).
% 0.20/0.38 Following clause subsumed by 25 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -ilf_type(A,set_type)|ilf_type(power_set(A),set_type).
% 0.20/0.38 Following clause subsumed by 25 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -ilf_type(A,set_type)| -relation_like(A)| -ilf_type(B,set_type)| -member(B,A)|ilf_type($f9(A,B),set_type).
% 0.20/0.38 Following clause subsumed by 25 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -ilf_type(A,set_type)| -relation_like(A)| -ilf_type(B,set_type)| -member(B,A)|ilf_type($f8(A,B),set_type).
% 0.20/0.38 Following clause subsumed by 25 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -ilf_type(A,set_type)|relation_like(A)|ilf_type($f10(A),set_type).
% 0.20/0.38 25 back subsumes 24.
% 0.20/0.38 25 back subsumes 23.
% 0.20/0.38 25 back subsumes 22.
% 0.20/0.38 25 back subsumes 21.
% 0.20/0.38 25 back subsumes 19.
% 0.20/0.38 25 back subsumes 11.
% 0.20/0.38 25 back subsumes 1.
% 0.20/0.38
% 0.20/0.38 ------------> process sos:
% 0.20/0.38 Following clause subsumed by 125 during input processing: 0 [] {-} ilf_type($c7,set_type).
% 0.20/0.38 Following clause subsumed by 125 during input processing: 0 [] {-} ilf_type($c6,set_type).
% 0.20/0.38 Following clause subsumed by 125 during input processing: 0 [] {-} ilf_type($c5,set_type).
% 0.20/0.38 125 back subsumes 25.
% 0.20/0.38 Following clause subsumed by 131 during input processing: 0 [copy,131,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.20/0.38 131 back subsumes 87.
% 0.20/0.38 131 back subsumes 86.
% 0.20/0.38
% 0.20/0.38 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.20/0.43
% 0.20/0.43 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.20/0.43
% 0.20/0.43 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.20/0.43
% 0.20/0.43
% 0.20/0.43 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.20/0.43
% 0.20/0.43 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.20/0.43 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.20/0.43 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.20/0.43 number of clauses in intial UL: 110
% 0.20/0.43 number of clauses initially in problem: 118
% 0.20/0.43 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 93
% 0.20/0.43 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 94
% 0.20/0.43 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 99
% 0.20/0.43 absolute distinct symbol count: 34
% 0.20/0.43 distinct predicate count: 5
% 0.20/0.43 distinct function count: 20
% 0.20/0.43 distinct constant count: 9
% 0.20/0.43
% 0.20/0.43 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.20/0.43
% 0.20/0.43
% 0.20/0.43
% 0.20/0.43 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.20/0.43
% 0.20/0.43 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.20/0.43
% 0.20/0.43 =========== start of search ===========
% 0.49/0.68
% 0.49/0.68 Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.49/0.68
% 0.49/0.68 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.49/0.68 member($c3,inverse2($c4,$c6)).
% 0.49/0.68
% 0.49/0.68 ------------- memory usage ------------
% 0.49/0.68 20 mallocs of 32700 bytes each, 638.7 K.
% 0.49/0.68 type (bytes each) gets frees in use avail bytes
% 0.49/0.68 sym_ent ( 304) 146 0 146 0 43.3 K
% 0.49/0.68 term ( 32) 25643 23576 2067 14 65.0 K
% 0.49/0.68 rel ( 40) 20491 17400 3091 12 121.2 K
% 0.49/0.68 term_ptr ( 16) 12388 5552 6836 602 116.2 K
% 0.49/0.68 formula_ptr_2 ( 56) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.49/0.68 fpa_head ( 24) 1037 135 902 24 21.7 K
% 0.49/0.68 fpa_tree ( 56) 3498 3498 0 38 2.1 K
% 0.49/0.68 context (1288) 4063 4063 0 7 8.8 K
% 0.49/0.68 trail ( 24) 165501 165501 0 7 0.2 K
% 0.49/0.68 imd_tree ( 32) 15 5 10 3 0.4 K
% 0.49/0.68 imd_pos (4024) 178 178 0 3 11.8 K
% 0.49/0.68 is_tree ( 24) 1203 466 737 136 20.5 K
% 0.49/0.68 is_pos (2424) 24223 24223 0 6 14.2 K
% 0.49/0.68 fsub_pos ( 16) 3282 3282 0 1 0.0 K
% 0.49/0.68 literal ( 32) 3654 2354 1300 2 40.7 K
% 0.49/0.68 clause ( 88) 817 423 394 1 33.9 K
% 0.49/0.68 list ( 272) 39 32 7 2 2.4 K
% 0.49/0.68 clash_nd ( 80) 1013 1013 0 5 0.4 K
% 0.49/0.68 clause_ptr ( 16) 541 155 386 17 6.3 K
% 0.49/0.68 int_ptr ( 16) 4404 1230 3174 4 49.7 K
% 0.49/0.68 ci_ptr ( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.49/0.68 link_node ( 120) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.49/0.68 ans_lit_node( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.49/0.68 formula_box( 168) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.49/0.68 formula( 40) 720 720 0 329 12.9 K
% 0.49/0.68 formula_ptr( 16) 29 29 0 29 0.5 K
% 0.49/0.68 cl_attribute( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.49/0.68
% 0.49/0.68 ********** is_delete, can't find end.
% 0.49/0.68 me 0.00
% 0.49/0.68 back demod time 0.00
% 0.49/0.68 back subsume 0.00
% 0.49/0.68 factor time 0.00
% 0.49/0.68 FINDER time 0.00
% 0.49/0.68 unindex time 0.00
% 0.49/0.68
% 0.49/0.68 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 0.49/0.68
% 0.49/0.68 true clauses given 3 (33.3%)
% 0.49/0.68 false clauses given 6
% 0.49/0.68
% 0.49/0.68 FALSE TRUE
% 0.49/0.68 4 0 1
% 0.49/0.68 5 0 1
% 0.49/0.68 6 0 3
% 0.49/0.68 7 0 2
% 0.49/0.68 8 0 1
% 0.49/0.68 9 0 4
% 0.49/0.68 11 0 1
% 0.49/0.68 12 1 3
% 0.49/0.68 13 1 12
% 0.49/0.68 15 1 11
% 0.49/0.68 16 1 0
% 0.49/0.68 17 1 0
% 0.49/0.68 18 13 5
% 0.49/0.68 19 2 2
% 0.49/0.68 20 18 5
% 0.49/0.68 21 20 5
% 0.49/0.68 22 0 1
% 0.49/0.68 23 1 0
% 0.49/0.68 28 0 1
% 0.49/0.68 29 0 1
% 0.49/0.68 tot: 59 59 (50.0% true)
% 0.49/0.68
% 0.49/0.68
% 0.49/0.68 Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.49/0.68
% 0.49/0.68 Forward subsumption counts, subsumer:number_subsumed.
% 0.49/0.68 1:0 2:0 3:0 4:0 5:0 6:0 7:0 8:0 9:0 10:0
% 0.49/0.68 11:0 12:0 13:0 14:0 15:0 16:0 17:0 18:0 19:0 20:0
% 0.49/0.68 21:0 22:0 23:0 24:0 25:10 26:0 27:0 28:0 29:0 30:0
% 0.49/0.68 31:0 32:0 33:0 34:0 35:0 36:0 37:0 38:0 39:0 40:0
% 0.49/0.68 41:0 42:0 43:0 44:0 45:0 46:0 47:0 48:0 49:0 50:0
% 0.49/0.68 51:0 52:0 53:0 54:0 55:0 56:0 57:0 58:0 59:0 60:0
% 0.49/0.68 61:0 62:0 63:0 64:0 65:0 66:0 67:0 68:0 69:0 70:0
% 0.49/0.68 71:0 72:0 73:0 74:0 75:0 76:0 77:0 78:0 79:0 80:0
% 0.49/0.68 81:0 82:0 83:0 84:0 85:0 86:1 87:1 88:0 89:0 90:1
% 0.49/0.68 91:0 92:0 93:0 94:0 95:0 96:0 97:0 98:0 99:0
% 0.49/0.68 All others: 166.
% 0.49/0.68
% 0.49/0.68 ********** ABNORMAL END **********
% 0.49/0.68
% 0.49/0.68 ********** is_delete, can't find end.
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------