TSTP Solution File: SET685+3 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : SET685+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 05:20:03 EDT 2022
% Result : Unknown 1.05s 1.23s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12 % Problem : SET685+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.12/0.13 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sun Jul 10 00:24:08 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.39 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.13/0.39 The process was started by sandbox on n008.cluster.edu,
% 0.13/0.39 Sun Jul 10 00:24:08 2022
% 0.13/0.39 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 27924.
% 0.13/0.39
% 0.13/0.39 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.13/0.39 set(auto).
% 0.13/0.39 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.13/0.39 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.13/0.39 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.13/0.39 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.13/0.39 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.13/0.39 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.13/0.39 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.13/0.39 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.13/0.39 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.13/0.39 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.13/0.39 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.13/0.39 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.13/0.39 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.13/0.39 clear(print_given).
% 0.13/0.39
% 0.13/0.39 formula_list(usable).
% 0.13/0.39
% 0.13/0.39 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=7.
% 0.13/0.39
% 0.13/0.39 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.13/0.39 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.13/0.39 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.13/0.39 clauses in usable.
% 0.13/0.39
% 0.13/0.39 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.13/0.39 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.13/0.39 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.13/0.39 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.13/0.39 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.13/0.39 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.13/0.39 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.13/0.39 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.13/0.39 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.13/0.39 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.13/0.39 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.13/0.39 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.13/0.39 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.13/0.39 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.13/0.39 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.13/0.39
% 0.13/0.39 ------------> process usable:
% 0.13/0.39
% 0.13/0.39 ------------> process sos:
% 0.13/0.39 Following clause subsumed by 140 during input processing: 0 [] {-} ilf_type($c7,set_type).
% 0.13/0.39 Following clause subsumed by 140 during input processing: 0 [] {-} ilf_type($c6,set_type).
% 0.13/0.39 Following clause subsumed by 140 during input processing: 0 [] {-} ilf_type($c5,set_type).
% 0.13/0.39 140 back subsumes 107.
% 0.13/0.39 140 back subsumes 106.
% 0.13/0.39 140 back subsumes 103.
% 0.13/0.39 140 back subsumes 97.
% 0.13/0.39 140 back subsumes 89.
% 0.13/0.39 140 back subsumes 88.
% 0.13/0.39 140 back subsumes 81.
% 0.13/0.39 140 back subsumes 57.
% 0.13/0.39 140 back subsumes 46.
% 0.13/0.39 140 back subsumes 43.
% 0.13/0.39 140 back subsumes 42.
% 0.13/0.39 140 back subsumes 41.
% 0.13/0.39 140 back subsumes 37.
% 0.13/0.39 140 back subsumes 33.
% 0.13/0.39 140 back subsumes 25.
% 0.13/0.39 140 back subsumes 23.
% 0.13/0.39 140 back subsumes 22.
% 0.13/0.39 140 back subsumes 21.
% 0.13/0.39 140 back subsumes 19.
% 0.13/0.39 140 back subsumes 11.
% 0.13/0.39 140 back subsumes 1.
% 0.13/0.39 Following clause subsumed by 146 during input processing: 0 [copy,146,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.13/0.39 146 back subsumes 99.
% 0.13/0.39 146 back subsumes 98.
% 0.13/0.39 146 back subsumes 90.
% 0.13/0.39
% 0.13/0.39 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.20/0.43
% 0.20/0.43 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.20/0.43
% 0.20/0.43 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.20/0.43
% 0.20/0.43
% 0.20/0.43 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.20/0.43
% 0.20/0.43 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.20/0.43 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.20/0.43 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.20/0.43 number of clauses in intial UL: 111
% 0.20/0.43 number of clauses initially in problem: 119
% 0.20/0.43 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 93
% 0.20/0.43 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 94
% 0.20/0.43 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 99
% 0.20/0.43 absolute distinct symbol count: 34
% 0.20/0.43 distinct predicate count: 5
% 0.20/0.43 distinct function count: 20
% 0.20/0.43 distinct constant count: 9
% 0.20/0.43
% 0.20/0.43 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.20/0.43
% 0.20/0.43
% 0.20/0.43
% 0.20/0.43 =========== start of search ===========
% 1.05/1.22
% 1.05/1.22 SEGMENTATION FAULT!! This is probably caused by a
% 1.05/1.22 bug in Otter. Please send copy of the input file to
% 1.05/1.22 otter@mcs.anl.gov, let us know what version of Otter you are
% 1.05/1.22 using, and send any other info that might be useful.
% 1.05/1.22
% 1.05/1.22
% 1.05/1.22 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.05/1.22
% 1.05/1.22 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.05/1.22
% 1.05/1.22 Model 2 [ 2 1 21131 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.05/1.22
% 1.05/1.22 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 1.05/1.22
% 1.05/1.22 true clauses given 1 (33.3%)
% 1.05/1.22 false clauses given 2
% 1.05/1.22
% 1.05/1.22 FALSE TRUE
% 1.05/1.22 2 0 1
% 1.05/1.22 3 0 1
% 1.05/1.22 4 1 0
% 1.05/1.22 5 0 1
% 1.05/1.22 6 2 1
% 1.05/1.22 7 3 0
% 1.05/1.22 8 0 1
% 1.05/1.22 9 2 2
% 1.05/1.22 10 0 1
% 1.05/1.22 11 0 1
% 1.05/1.22 12 1 0
% 1.05/1.22 13 7 5
% 1.05/1.22 15 6 5
% 1.05/1.22 19 0 1
% 1.05/1.22 tot: 22 20 (47.6% true)
% 1.05/1.22
% 1.05/1.22
% 1.05/1.22 Model 2 [ 2 1 21131 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.05/1.22
% 1.05/1.22 SEGMENTATION FAULT!! This is probably caused by a
% 1.05/1.22 bug in Otter. Please send copy of the input file to
% 1.05/1.22 otter@mcs.anl.gov, let us know what version of Otter you are
% 1.05/1.22 using, and send any other info that might be useful.
% 1.05/1.22
% 1.05/1.22
% 1.05/1.22 The job finished Sun Jul 10 00:24:09 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------