TSTP Solution File: SET684+3 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : SET684+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 05:20:03 EDT 2022
% Result : Unknown 0.99s 1.19s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.01/0.12 % Problem : SET684+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.12/0.12 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 10:16:54 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.38 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.19/0.38 The process was started by sandbox2 on n015.cluster.edu,
% 0.19/0.38 Mon Jul 11 10:16:54 2022
% 0.19/0.38 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 16196.
% 0.19/0.38
% 0.19/0.38 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.19/0.38 set(auto).
% 0.19/0.38 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.19/0.38 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.19/0.38 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.19/0.38 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.19/0.38 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.19/0.38 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.19/0.38 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.19/0.38 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.19/0.38 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.19/0.38 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.19/0.38 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.19/0.38 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.19/0.38 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.19/0.38 clear(print_given).
% 0.19/0.38
% 0.19/0.38 formula_list(usable).
% 0.19/0.38
% 0.19/0.38 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=8.
% 0.19/0.38
% 0.19/0.38 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.19/0.38 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.19/0.38 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.19/0.38 clauses in usable.
% 0.19/0.38
% 0.19/0.38 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.19/0.38 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.19/0.38 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.19/0.38 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.19/0.38 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.19/0.38 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.19/0.38 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.19/0.38 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.19/0.38 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.19/0.38 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.19/0.38 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.19/0.38 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.19/0.38 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.19/0.38 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.19/0.38 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.19/0.38
% 0.19/0.38 ------------> process usable:
% 0.19/0.38
% 0.19/0.38 ------------> process sos:
% 0.19/0.38 Following clause subsumed by 156 during input processing: 0 [] {-} ilf_type($c9,set_type).
% 0.19/0.38 Following clause subsumed by 156 during input processing: 0 [] {-} ilf_type($c8,set_type).
% 0.19/0.38 Following clause subsumed by 156 during input processing: 0 [] {-} ilf_type($c7,set_type).
% 0.19/0.38 156 back subsumes 129.
% 0.19/0.38 156 back subsumes 115.
% 0.19/0.38 156 back subsumes 114.
% 0.19/0.38 156 back subsumes 111.
% 0.19/0.38 156 back subsumes 105.
% 0.19/0.38 156 back subsumes 96.
% 0.19/0.38 156 back subsumes 95.
% 0.19/0.38 156 back subsumes 88.
% 0.19/0.38 156 back subsumes 60.
% 0.19/0.38 156 back subsumes 59.
% 0.19/0.38 156 back subsumes 48.
% 0.19/0.38 156 back subsumes 45.
% 0.19/0.38 156 back subsumes 44.
% 0.19/0.38 156 back subsumes 43.
% 0.19/0.38 156 back subsumes 39.
% 0.19/0.38 156 back subsumes 33.
% 0.19/0.38 156 back subsumes 23.
% 0.19/0.38 156 back subsumes 22.
% 0.19/0.38 156 back subsumes 21.
% 0.19/0.38 156 back subsumes 19.
% 0.19/0.38 156 back subsumes 11.
% 0.19/0.38 156 back subsumes 1.
% 0.19/0.38 Following clause subsumed by 164 during input processing: 0 [copy,164,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.19/0.38 164 back subsumes 107.
% 0.19/0.38 164 back subsumes 106.
% 0.19/0.38 164 back subsumes 97.
% 0.19/0.38 164 back subsumes 37.
% 0.19/0.38
% 0.19/0.38 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.19/0.43
% 0.19/0.43 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.43
% 0.19/0.43 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.19/0.43
% 0.19/0.43
% 0.19/0.43 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.19/0.43
% 0.19/0.43 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.19/0.43 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.19/0.43 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.19/0.43 number of clauses in intial UL: 125
% 0.19/0.43 number of clauses initially in problem: 135
% 0.19/0.43 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 92
% 0.19/0.43 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 94
% 0.19/0.43 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 99
% 0.19/0.43 absolute distinct symbol count: 36
% 0.19/0.43 distinct predicate count: 5
% 0.19/0.43 distinct function count: 20
% 0.19/0.43 distinct constant count: 11
% 0.19/0.43
% 0.19/0.43 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.19/0.43
% 0.19/0.43
% 0.19/0.43
% 0.19/0.43 =========== start of search ===========
% 0.99/1.19
% 0.99/1.19 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.99/1.19
% 0.99/1.19 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.99/1.19
% 0.99/1.19 Model 2 [ 2 3 25490 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.99/1.19
% 0.99/1.19 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.99/1.19
% 0.99/1.19 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.99/1.19
% 0.99/1.19 Model 3 [ 2 2 12930 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.99/1.19 ilf_type(A,set_type).
% 0.99/1.19
% 0.99/1.19 ------------- memory usage ------------
% 0.99/1.19 20 mallocs of 32700 bytes each, 638.7 K.
% 0.99/1.19 type (bytes each) gets frees in use avail bytes
% 0.99/1.19 sym_ent ( 304) 150 0 150 0 44.5 K
% 0.99/1.19 term ( 32) 26602 24405 2197 14 69.1 K
% 0.99/1.19 rel ( 40) 21257 18173 3084 13 121.0 K
% 0.99/1.19 term_ptr ( 16) 11586 4229 7357 592 124.2 K
% 0.99/1.19 formula_ptr_2 ( 56) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.99/1.19 fpa_head ( 24) 967 155 812 48 20.2 K
% 0.99/1.19 fpa_tree ( 56) 2682 2682 0 20 1.1 K
% 0.99/1.19 context (1288) 4119 4119 0 8 10.1 K
% 0.99/1.19 trail ( 24) 239827 239827 0 8 0.2 K
% 0.99/1.19 imd_tree ( 32) 13 3 10 3 0.4 K
% 0.99/1.19 imd_pos (4024) 142 142 0 3 11.8 K
% 0.99/1.19 is_tree ( 24) 1188 427 761 183 22.1 K
% 0.99/1.19 is_pos (2424) 21378 21378 0 7 16.6 K
% 0.99/1.19 fsub_pos ( 16) 2480 2480 0 1 0.0 K
% 0.99/1.19 literal ( 32) 3723 2438 1285 2 40.2 K
% 0.99/1.19 clause ( 88) 866 472 394 1 33.9 K
% 0.99/1.19 list ( 272) 41 34 7 2 2.4 K
% 0.99/1.19 clash_nd ( 80) 1094 1094 0 6 0.5 K
% 0.99/1.19 clause_ptr ( 16) 472 130 342 20 5.7 K
% 0.99/1.19 int_ptr ( 16) 3302 879 2423 4 37.9 K
% 0.99/1.19 ci_ptr ( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.99/1.19 link_node ( 120) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.99/1.19 ans_lit_node( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.99/1.19 formula_box( 168) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.99/1.19 formula( 40) 773 773 0 364 14.2 K
% 0.99/1.19 formula_ptr( 16) 31 31 0 31 0.5 K
% 0.99/1.19 cl_attribute( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.99/1.19
% 0.99/1.19 ********** is_delete, can't find term.
% 0.99/1.19 ep cl time 0.00
% 0.99/1.19 hints time 0.00
% 0.99/1.19 print_cl time 0.00
% 0.99/1.19 conflict time 0.00
% 0.99/1.19 new demod time 0.00
% 0.99/1.19 post_process time 0.00
% 0.99/1.19 back demod time 0.00
% 0.99/1.19 back subsume 0.00
% 0.99/1.19 factor time 0.00
% 0.99/1.19 FINDER time 0.00
% 0.99/1.19 unindex time 0.00
% 0.99/1.19
% 0.99/1.19 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 0.99/1.19
% 0.99/1.19 true clauses given 3 (33.3%)
% 0.99/1.19 false clauses given 6
% 0.99/1.19
% 0.99/1.19 FALSE TRUE
% 0.99/1.19 3 0 1
% 0.99/1.19 5 1 1
% 0.99/1.19 6 3 1
% 0.99/1.19 7 2 1
% 0.99/1.19 8 0 1
% 0.99/1.19 9 1 0
% 0.99/1.19 10 1 1
% 0.99/1.19 12 3 4
% 0.99/1.19 13 12 10
% 0.99/1.19 14 9 16
% 0.99/1.19 15 12 12
% 0.99/1.19 16 2 2
% 0.99/1.19 19 1 1
% 0.99/1.19 tot: 47 51 (52.0% true)
% 0.99/1.19
% 0.99/1.19
% 0.99/1.19 Model 3 [ 2 2 12930 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.99/1.19
% 0.99/1.19 Forward subsumption counts, subsumer:number_subsumed.
% 0.99/1.19 1:0 2:0 3:0 4:0 5:0 6:0 7:0 8:0 9:0 10:0
% 0.99/1.19 11:0 12:0 13:0 14:0 15:0 16:0 17:0 18:0 19:0 20:0
% 0.99/1.19 21:0 22:0 23:0 24:0 25:0 26:0 27:0 28:0 29:0 30:0
% 0.99/1.19 31:0 32:0 33:0 34:0 35:0 36:0 37:0 38:0 39:0 40:0
% 0.99/1.19 41:0 42:0 43:0 44:0 45:0 46:0 47:0 48:0 49:0 50:0
% 0.99/1.19 51:0 52:0 53:0 54:0 55:0 56:0 57:0 58:0 59:0 60:0
% 0.99/1.19 61:0 62:0 63:0 64:0 65:0 66:0 67:0 68:0 69:12 70:0
% 0.99/1.19 71:0 72:0 73:0 74:0 75:0 76:0 77:0 78:0 79:0 80:0
% 0.99/1.19 81:0 82:0 83:0 84:0 85:0 86:0 87:0 88:0 89:0 90:0
% 0.99/1.19 91:0 92:0 93:0 94:0 95:0 96:0 97:0 98:0 99:0
% 0.99/1.19 All others: 140.
% 0.99/1.19
% 0.99/1.19 ********** ABNORMAL END **********
% 0.99/1.19
% 0.99/1.19 ********** is_delete, can't find term.
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------