TSTP Solution File: SET684+3 by SNARK---20120808r022

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : SET684+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 05:11:32 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 27.27s 27.50s
% Output   : Refutation 27.34s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :   16
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   42 (  17 unt;   6 nHn;  41 RR)
%            Number of literals    :  113 (   3 equ;  69 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    8 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   18 (  18 usr;  10 con; 0-5 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   68 (   5 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(2,axiom,
    ( ~ ilf_type(X,set_type)
    | ~ ilf_type(Y,set_type)
    | ~ ilf_type(Z,binary_relation_type)
    | ~ ilf_type(U,binary_relation_type)
    | ~ member(ordered_pair(X,Y),compose(Z,U))
    | member(ordered_pair(X,'SKOLEMAAAV1'(X,Z,Y,U)),Z) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p1) ).

cnf(3,axiom,
    ( ~ ilf_type(X,set_type)
    | ~ ilf_type(Y,set_type)
    | ~ ilf_type(Z,binary_relation_type)
    | ~ ilf_type(U,binary_relation_type)
    | ~ member(ordered_pair(X,Y),compose(Z,U))
    | member(ordered_pair('SKOLEMAAAV1'(X,Z,Y,U),Y),U) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p1) ).

cnf(4,axiom,
    ( ~ ilf_type(X,set_type)
    | ~ ilf_type(Y,set_type)
    | ~ ilf_type(Z,binary_relation_type)
    | ~ ilf_type(U,binary_relation_type)
    | member(ordered_pair(X,Y),compose(Z,U))
    | ~ ilf_type(V,set_type)
    | ~ member(ordered_pair(X,V),Z)
    | ~ member(ordered_pair(V,Y),U) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p1) ).

cnf(5,axiom,
    ( ~ ilf_type(X,set_type)
    | ~ ilf_type(Y,set_type)
    | ~ ilf_type(Z,set_type)
    | ~ ilf_type(U,set_type)
    | ~ ilf_type(V,relation_type(X,Y))
    | ~ member(ordered_pair(Z,U),V)
    | member(Z,X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p2) ).

cnf(13,axiom,
    ( ~ ilf_type(X,set_type)
    | ~ ilf_type(Y,set_type)
    | ~ ilf_type(Z,relation_type(X,Y))
    | ilf_type(Z,subset_type(cross_product(X,Y))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p5) ).

cnf(16,axiom,
    ( ~ ilf_type(X,set_type)
    | empty(Y)
    | ~ ilf_type(Y,set_type)
    | ilf_type(X,member_type(Y))
    | ~ member(X,Y) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p7) ).

cnf(27,axiom,
    ( ~ ilf_type(X,set_type)
    | ilf_type(X,binary_relation_type)
    | ~ relation_like(X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p15) ).

cnf(49,axiom,
    ( ~ ilf_type(X,set_type)
    | ~ ilf_type(Y,set_type)
    | ~ ilf_type(Z,subset_type(cross_product(X,Y)))
    | relation_like(Z) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p26) ).

cnf(50,axiom,
    ( ~ ilf_type(X,set_type)
    | ~ ilf_type(Y,set_type)
    | ~ ilf_type(Z,set_type)
    | ~ ilf_type(U,relation_type(X,Y))
    | ~ ilf_type(V,relation_type(Y,Z))
    | compose5(X,Y,Z,U,V) = compose(U,V) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p27) ).

cnf(52,axiom,
    ilf_type(X,set_type),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p29) ).

cnf(54,negated_conjecture,
    ~ empty('SKOLEMAAAV13'),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_relset_1_51) ).

cnf(56,negated_conjecture,
    ilf_type('SKOLEMAAAV15',relation_type('SKOLEMAAAV12','SKOLEMAAAV13')),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_relset_1_51) ).

cnf(57,negated_conjecture,
    ilf_type('SKOLEMAAAV16',relation_type('SKOLEMAAAV13','SKOLEMAAAV14')),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_relset_1_51) ).

cnf(60,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ member(ordered_pair('SKOLEMAAAV17','SKOLEMAAAV18'),compose5('SKOLEMAAAV12','SKOLEMAAAV13','SKOLEMAAAV14','SKOLEMAAAV15','SKOLEMAAAV16'))
    | ~ ilf_type(X,member_type('SKOLEMAAAV13'))
    | ~ member(ordered_pair('SKOLEMAAAV17',X),'SKOLEMAAAV15')
    | ~ member(ordered_pair(X,'SKOLEMAAAV18'),'SKOLEMAAAV16') ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_relset_1_51) ).

cnf(62,negated_conjecture,
    ( member(ordered_pair('SKOLEMAAAV17','SKOLEMAAAV18'),compose5('SKOLEMAAAV12','SKOLEMAAAV13','SKOLEMAAAV14','SKOLEMAAAV15','SKOLEMAAAV16'))
    | member(ordered_pair('SKOLEMAAAV17','SKOLEMAAAV19'),'SKOLEMAAAV15') ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_relset_1_51) ).

cnf(63,negated_conjecture,
    ( member(ordered_pair('SKOLEMAAAV17','SKOLEMAAAV18'),compose5('SKOLEMAAAV12','SKOLEMAAAV13','SKOLEMAAAV14','SKOLEMAAAV15','SKOLEMAAAV16'))
    | member(ordered_pair('SKOLEMAAAV19','SKOLEMAAAV18'),'SKOLEMAAAV16') ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_relset_1_51) ).

cnf(64,plain,
    ( ~ ilf_type(X,binary_relation_type)
    | ~ ilf_type(Y,binary_relation_type)
    | ~ member(ordered_pair(Z,U),compose(X,Y))
    | member(ordered_pair(Z,'SKOLEMAAAV1'(Z,X,U,Y)),X) ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[2,52]) ).

cnf(65,plain,
    ( ~ ilf_type(X,binary_relation_type)
    | ~ ilf_type(Y,binary_relation_type)
    | ~ member(ordered_pair(Z,U),compose(X,Y))
    | member(ordered_pair('SKOLEMAAAV1'(Z,X,U,Y),U),Y) ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[3,52]) ).

cnf(66,plain,
    ( ~ ilf_type(X,binary_relation_type)
    | ~ ilf_type(Y,binary_relation_type)
    | member(ordered_pair(Z,U),compose(X,Y))
    | ~ member(ordered_pair(Z,V),X)
    | ~ member(ordered_pair(V,U),Y) ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[4,52]) ).

cnf(67,plain,
    ( ~ ilf_type(X,relation_type(Y,Z))
    | ~ member(ordered_pair(U,V),X)
    | member(U,Y) ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[5,52]) ).

cnf(72,plain,
    ( ~ ilf_type(X,relation_type(Y,Z))
    | ilf_type(X,subset_type(cross_product(Y,Z))) ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[13,52]) ).

cnf(75,plain,
    ( empty(X)
    | ilf_type(Y,member_type(X))
    | ~ member(Y,X) ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[16,52]) ).

cnf(81,plain,
    ( ilf_type(X,binary_relation_type)
    | ~ relation_like(X) ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[27,52]) ).

cnf(96,plain,
    ( ~ ilf_type(X,subset_type(cross_product(Y,Z)))
    | relation_like(X) ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[49,52]) ).

cnf(97,plain,
    ( ~ ilf_type(X,relation_type(Y,Z))
    | ~ ilf_type(U,relation_type(Z,V))
    | compose5(Y,Z,V,X,U) = compose(X,U) ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[50,52]) ).

cnf(132,plain,
    ilf_type('SKOLEMAAAV16',subset_type(cross_product('SKOLEMAAAV13','SKOLEMAAAV14'))),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[72,57]) ).

cnf(133,plain,
    ilf_type('SKOLEMAAAV15',subset_type(cross_product('SKOLEMAAAV12','SKOLEMAAAV13'))),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[72,56]) ).

cnf(159,plain,
    compose5('SKOLEMAAAV12','SKOLEMAAAV13','SKOLEMAAAV14','SKOLEMAAAV15','SKOLEMAAAV16') = compose('SKOLEMAAAV15','SKOLEMAAAV16'),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[97,56,57]) ).

cnf(160,plain,
    ( ~ member(ordered_pair('SKOLEMAAAV17','SKOLEMAAAV18'),compose('SKOLEMAAAV15','SKOLEMAAAV16'))
    | ~ ilf_type(X,member_type('SKOLEMAAAV13'))
    | ~ member(ordered_pair('SKOLEMAAAV17',X),'SKOLEMAAAV15')
    | ~ member(ordered_pair(X,'SKOLEMAAAV18'),'SKOLEMAAAV16') ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[60,159,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(162,plain,
    ( member(ordered_pair('SKOLEMAAAV17','SKOLEMAAAV18'),compose('SKOLEMAAAV15','SKOLEMAAAV16'))
    | member(ordered_pair('SKOLEMAAAV17','SKOLEMAAAV19'),'SKOLEMAAAV15') ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[62,159,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(163,plain,
    ( member(ordered_pair('SKOLEMAAAV17','SKOLEMAAAV18'),compose('SKOLEMAAAV15','SKOLEMAAAV16'))
    | member(ordered_pair('SKOLEMAAAV19','SKOLEMAAAV18'),'SKOLEMAAAV16') ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[63,159,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(231,plain,
    relation_like('SKOLEMAAAV16'),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[96,132]) ).

cnf(233,plain,
    ilf_type('SKOLEMAAAV16',binary_relation_type),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[81,231]) ).

cnf(245,plain,
    relation_like('SKOLEMAAAV15'),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[96,133]) ).

cnf(247,plain,
    ilf_type('SKOLEMAAAV15',binary_relation_type),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[81,245]) ).

cnf(259,plain,
    member(ordered_pair('SKOLEMAAAV17','SKOLEMAAAV18'),compose('SKOLEMAAAV15','SKOLEMAAAV16')),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[66,247,233,162,163]) ).

cnf(260,plain,
    ( ~ ilf_type(X,member_type('SKOLEMAAAV13'))
    | ~ member(ordered_pair('SKOLEMAAAV17',X),'SKOLEMAAAV15')
    | ~ member(ordered_pair(X,'SKOLEMAAAV18'),'SKOLEMAAAV16') ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[160,259]) ).

cnf(807,plain,
    member(ordered_pair('SKOLEMAAAV1'('SKOLEMAAAV17','SKOLEMAAAV15','SKOLEMAAAV18','SKOLEMAAAV16'),'SKOLEMAAAV18'),'SKOLEMAAAV16'),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[65,259,247,233]) ).

cnf(808,plain,
    member(ordered_pair('SKOLEMAAAV17','SKOLEMAAAV1'('SKOLEMAAAV17','SKOLEMAAAV15','SKOLEMAAAV18','SKOLEMAAAV16')),'SKOLEMAAAV15'),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[64,259,247,233]) ).

cnf(44360,plain,
    member('SKOLEMAAAV1'('SKOLEMAAAV17','SKOLEMAAAV15','SKOLEMAAAV18','SKOLEMAAAV16'),'SKOLEMAAAV13'),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[67,807,57]) ).

cnf(44375,plain,
    ilf_type('SKOLEMAAAV1'('SKOLEMAAAV17','SKOLEMAAAV15','SKOLEMAAAV18','SKOLEMAAAV16'),member_type('SKOLEMAAAV13')),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[75,44360,54]) ).

cnf(44383,plain,
    $false,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[260,808,807]),44375]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : SET684+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 10:07:49 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.45  /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.46  * 
% 0.19/0.46  * 
% 0.19/0.47  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.19/0.47  * 
% 0.19/0.47  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.19/0.47  * 
% 0.19/0.47  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.19/0.47   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.19/0.47   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.19/0.47   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.19/0.47   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.19/0.47   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.19/0.47   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.19/0.47   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.19/0.47   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.19/0.47   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.19/0.47   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.19/0.47   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.19/0.47   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.19/0.47  * 
% 0.19/0.47  "."
% 0.19/0.47  * 
% 0.19/0.47  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-11T10:07:49
% 0.19/0.47  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n014.cluster.edu at 2022-07-11T10:07:49
% 27.27/27.50  
% 27.27/27.50  
% 27.27/27.50  #||
% 27.27/27.50  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 27.27/27.50  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 27.34/27.53  ||#
% 27.34/27.53  
% 27.34/27.53  ; Summary of computation:
% 27.34/27.53  ;     88370 formulas have been input or derived (from 455 formulas).
% 27.34/27.53  ;     44383 (50%) were retained.  Of these,
% 27.34/27.53  ;          684 ( 2%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 27.34/27.53  ;        43699 (98%) are still being kept.
% 27.34/27.53  ; 
% 27.34/27.53  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 27.34/27.53  ;     0.011   0%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 27.34/27.53  ;     0.003   0%   Assert                       (30 calls)
% 27.34/27.53  ;     3.940  15%   Process new row              (87,878 calls)
% 27.34/27.53  ;    19.457  72%   Resolution                   (908 calls)
% 27.34/27.53  ;     0.059   0%   Paramodulation               (454 calls)
% 27.34/27.53  ;     0.000   0%   Factoring                    (22 calls)
% 27.34/27.53  ;     0.009   0%   Condensing                   (1,191 calls)
% 27.34/27.53  ;     0.081   0%   Forward subsumption          (1,191 calls)
% 27.34/27.53  ;     0.044   0%   Backward subsumption         (1,025 calls)
% 27.34/27.53  ;     0.012   0%   Clause clause subsumption    (2,990 calls)
% 27.34/27.53  ;     0.953   4%   Forward simplification       (87,876 calls)
% 27.34/27.53  ;     2.104   8%   Backward simplification      (44,381 calls)
% 27.34/27.53  ;     0.012   0%   Ordering                     (2,490 calls)
% 27.34/27.53  ;     0.000   0%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 27.34/27.53  ;     0.000   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 27.34/27.53  ;     0.321   1%   Other
% 27.34/27.53  ;    27.006        Total
% 27.34/27.53  ;    27.064        Real time
% 27.34/27.54  ; 
% 27.34/27.54  ; Term-hash-array has 91,352 terms in all.
% 27.34/27.54  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 938 entries (948 at peak, 1,025 added, 87 deleted).
% 27.34/27.54  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 5,119 nodes (5,189 at peak, 5,882 added, 763 deleted).
% 27.34/27.54  ;  Retrieved 3,532 possibly forward subsuming rows in 1,191 calls.
% 27.34/27.54  ;  Retrieved 1,038 possibly backward subsumed rows in 1,025 calls.
% 27.34/27.54  ; Path-index has 90,695 entries (90,695 at peak, 91,486 added, 791 deleted).
% 27.34/27.54  ; Path-index has 11,387 nodes (11,387 at peak, 13,102 added, 1,715 deleted).
% 27.34/27.54  ; Trie-index has 90,695 entries (90,695 at peak, 91,486 added, 791 deleted).
% 27.34/27.54  ; Trie-index has 242,378 nodes (242,378 at peak, 250,184 added, 7,806 deleted).
% 27.34/27.54  ; Retrieved 43,837 generalization terms in 92,788 calls.
% 27.34/27.54  ; Retrieved 43,394 instance terms in 43,355 calls.
% 27.34/27.54  ; Retrieved 47,477,020 unifiable terms in 431,470 calls.
% 27.34/27.54  ; 
% 27.34/27.54  ; The agenda of rows to process has 4 entries:
% 27.34/27.54  ;     1 with value 18              1 with value 22               1 with value 36
% 27.34/27.54  ;     1 with value 20
% 27.34/27.54  ; The agenda of rows to give has 43256 entries:
% 27.34/27.54  ;     1 with value (4 9)          48 with value (4 32)          98 with value (4 49)
% 27.34/27.54  ;     2 with value (4 12)         24 with value (4 33)         150 with value (4 50)
% 27.34/27.54  ;   121 with value (4 17)         54 with value (4 34)          26 with value (4 51)
% 27.34/27.54  ;   126 with value (4 18)         32 with value (4 35)           8 with value (4 52)
% 27.34/27.54  ;   392 with value (4 19)         96 with value (4 36)           2 with value (4 53)
% 27.34/27.54  ;   373 with value (4 20)         27 with value (4 37)          11 with value (4 54)
% 27.34/27.54  ;  1837 with value (4 21)        101 with value (4 38)          15 with value (4 55)
% 27.34/27.54  ;   638 with value (4 22)         50 with value (4 39)           3 with value (4 56)
% 27.34/27.54  ;  5977 with value (4 23)         74 with value (4 40)          13 with value (4 57)
% 27.34/27.54  ;  1603 with value (4 24)         13 with value (4 41)          16 with value (4 58)
% 27.34/27.54  ; 13032 with value (4 25)         85 with value (4 42)          22 with value (4 60)
% 27.34/27.54  ;  3195 with value (4 26)         25 with value (4 43)          98 with value (4 61)
% 27.34/27.54  ; 11820 with value (4 27)        100 with value (4 44)          12 with value (4 62)
% 27.34/27.54  ;  2404 with value (4 28)         12 with value (4 45)           4 with value (4 67)
% 27.34/27.54  ;   390 with value (4 29)          4 with value (4 46)          10 with value (4 68)
% 27.34/27.54  ;    36 with value (4 30)         29 with value (4 47)           6 with value (4 70)
% 27.34/27.54  ;    18 with value (4 31)         15 with value (4 48)           8 with value (4 72)
% 27.34/27.54  Evaluation took:
% 27.34/27.54    27.068 seconds of real time
% 27.34/27.54    26.183971 seconds of user run time
% 27.34/27.54    0.8624 seconds of system run time
% 27.34/27.54    [Run times include 3.207 seconds GC run time.]
% 27.34/27.54    0 calls to %EVAL
% 27.34/27.54    0 page faults and
% 27.34/27.54    1,174,715,368 bytes consed.
% 27.34/27.54  :PROOF-FOUND
% 27.34/27.54  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-11T10:08:16
% 27.34/27.54  :PROOF-FOUND
% 27.34/27.54  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------