TSTP Solution File: SET681+3 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : SET681+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 05:20:02 EDT 2022
% Result : Unknown 0.91s 1.14s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.01/0.11 % Problem : SET681+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.01/0.12 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sun Jul 10 18:39:55 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.36 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.19/0.36 The process was started by sandbox on n023.cluster.edu,
% 0.19/0.36 Sun Jul 10 18:39:55 2022
% 0.19/0.36 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 8254.
% 0.19/0.36
% 0.19/0.36 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.19/0.36 set(auto).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.19/0.36 clear(print_given).
% 0.19/0.36
% 0.19/0.36 formula_list(usable).
% 0.19/0.36
% 0.19/0.36 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=7.
% 0.19/0.36
% 0.19/0.36 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.19/0.36 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.19/0.36 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.19/0.36 clauses in usable.
% 0.19/0.36
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.19/0.36
% 0.19/0.36 ------------> process usable:
% 0.19/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 3 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -ilf_type(A,set_type)| -ilf_type(B,set_type)| -ilf_type(C,binary_relation_type)| -member(ordered_pair(A,B),C)|member(B,range_of(C)).
% 0.19/0.36
% 0.19/0.36 ------------> process sos:
% 0.19/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 133 during input processing: 0 [] {-} ilf_type($c6,set_type).
% 0.19/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 133 during input processing: 0 [] {-} ilf_type($c5,set_type).
% 0.19/0.36 133 back subsumes 105.
% 0.19/0.36 133 back subsumes 104.
% 0.19/0.36 133 back subsumes 101.
% 0.19/0.36 133 back subsumes 95.
% 0.19/0.36 133 back subsumes 87.
% 0.19/0.36 133 back subsumes 86.
% 0.19/0.36 133 back subsumes 79.
% 0.19/0.36 133 back subsumes 47.
% 0.19/0.36 133 back subsumes 44.
% 0.19/0.36 133 back subsumes 43.
% 0.19/0.36 133 back subsumes 42.
% 0.19/0.36 133 back subsumes 38.
% 0.19/0.36 133 back subsumes 34.
% 0.19/0.36 133 back subsumes 25.
% 0.19/0.36 133 back subsumes 24.
% 0.19/0.36 133 back subsumes 23.
% 0.19/0.36 133 back subsumes 22.
% 0.19/0.36 133 back subsumes 21.
% 0.19/0.36 133 back subsumes 19.
% 0.19/0.36 133 back subsumes 11.
% 0.19/0.36 133 back subsumes 1.
% 0.19/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 138 during input processing: 0 [copy,138,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.19/0.36 138 back subsumes 97.
% 0.19/0.36 138 back subsumes 96.
% 0.19/0.36 138 back subsumes 88.
% 0.19/0.36
% 0.19/0.36 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.19/0.39
% 0.19/0.39 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.39
% 0.19/0.39 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.19/0.39
% 0.19/0.39
% 0.19/0.39 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.19/0.39
% 0.19/0.39 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.19/0.39 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.19/0.39 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.19/0.39 number of clauses in intial UL: 104
% 0.19/0.39 number of clauses initially in problem: 111
% 0.19/0.39 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 93
% 0.19/0.39 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 94
% 0.19/0.39 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 99
% 0.19/0.39 absolute distinct symbol count: 35
% 0.19/0.39 distinct predicate count: 5
% 0.19/0.39 distinct function count: 22
% 0.19/0.39 distinct constant count: 8
% 0.19/0.39
% 0.19/0.39 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.19/0.39
% 0.19/0.39
% 0.19/0.39
% 0.19/0.39 =========== start of search ===========
% 0.91/1.14
% 0.91/1.14 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.91/1.14
% 0.91/1.14 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.91/1.14
% 0.91/1.14 Model 2 [ 2 1 8595 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.91/1.14
% 0.91/1.14 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.91/1.14
% 0.91/1.14 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.91/1.14 ilf_type(A,set_type).
% 0.91/1.14
% 0.91/1.14 ------------- memory usage ------------
% 0.91/1.14 16 mallocs of 32700 bytes each, 510.9 K.
% 0.91/1.14 type (bytes each) gets frees in use avail bytes
% 0.91/1.14 sym_ent ( 304) 146 0 146 0 43.3 K
% 0.91/1.14 term ( 32) 19197 17376 1821 14 57.3 K
% 0.91/1.14 rel ( 40) 15271 12902 2369 13 93.0 K
% 0.91/1.14 term_ptr ( 16) 8822 3601 5221 481 89.1 K
% 0.91/1.14 formula_ptr_2 ( 56) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.91/1.14 fpa_head ( 24) 945 163 782 48 19.5 K
% 0.91/1.14 fpa_tree ( 56) 1614 1614 0 18 1.0 K
% 0.91/1.14 context (1288) 2931 2931 0 7 8.8 K
% 0.91/1.14 trail ( 24) 148472 148472 0 7 0.2 K
% 0.91/1.14 imd_tree ( 32) 14 3 11 3 0.4 K
% 0.91/1.14 imd_pos (4024) 118 118 0 3 11.8 K
% 0.91/1.14 is_tree ( 24) 1023 428 595 161 17.7 K
% 0.91/1.14 is_pos (2424) 12531 12531 0 5 11.8 K
% 0.91/1.14 fsub_pos ( 16) 1736 1736 0 1 0.0 K
% 0.91/1.14 literal ( 32) 2550 1536 1014 2 31.8 K
% 0.91/1.14 clause ( 88) 615 288 327 1 28.2 K
% 0.91/1.14 list ( 272) 43 36 7 2 2.4 K
% 0.91/1.14 clash_nd ( 80) 673 673 0 5 0.4 K
% 0.91/1.14 clause_ptr ( 16) 394 116 278 18 4.6 K
% 0.91/1.14 int_ptr ( 16) 2264 493 1771 4 27.7 K
% 0.91/1.14 ci_ptr ( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.91/1.14 link_node ( 120) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.91/1.14 ans_lit_node( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.91/1.14 formula_box( 168) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.91/1.14 formula( 40) 731 731 0 335 13.1 K
% 0.91/1.14 formula_ptr( 16) 33 33 0 33 0.5 K
% 0.91/1.14 cl_attribute( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.91/1.14
% 0.91/1.14 ********** is_delete, can't find term.
% 0.91/1.14 rint_cl time 0.00
% 0.91/1.14 conflict time 0.00
% 0.91/1.14 new demod time 0.00
% 0.91/1.14 post_process time 0.00
% 0.91/1.14 back demod time 0.00
% 0.91/1.14 back subsume 0.00
% 0.91/1.14 factor time 0.00
% 0.91/1.14 FINDER time 0.00
% 0.91/1.14 unindex time 0.00
% 0.91/1.14
% 0.91/1.14 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 0.91/1.14
% 0.91/1.14 true clauses given 4 (44.4%)
% 0.91/1.14 false clauses given 5
% 0.91/1.14
% 0.91/1.14 FALSE TRUE
% 0.91/1.14 3 0 1
% 0.91/1.14 6 3 1
% 0.91/1.14 7 5 3
% 0.91/1.14 8 1 0
% 0.91/1.14 9 0 1
% 0.91/1.14 10 1 0
% 0.91/1.14 11 0 1
% 0.91/1.14 12 3 0
% 0.91/1.14 13 8 4
% 0.91/1.14 14 6 2
% 0.91/1.14 15 16 3
% 0.91/1.14 16 3 0
% 0.91/1.14 17 2 0
% 0.91/1.14 18 1 0
% 0.91/1.14 19 2 0
% 0.91/1.14 21 1 0
% 0.91/1.14 tot: 52 16 (23.5% true)
% 0.91/1.14
% 0.91/1.14
% 0.91/1.14 Model 2 [ 2 -16 8595 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.91/1.14
% 0.91/1.14 Forward subsumption counts, subsumer:number_subsumed.
% 0.91/1.14 1:0 2:0 3:1 4:0 5:0 6:0 7:0 8:0 9:0 10:0
% 0.91/1.14 11:0 12:0 13:0 14:0 15:0 16:0 17:0 18:0 19:0 20:0
% 0.91/1.14 21:0 22:0 23:0 24:0 25:0 26:0 27:0 28:0 29:0 30:0
% 0.91/1.14 31:0 32:0 33:0 34:0 35:0 36:0 37:0 38:0 39:0 40:0
% 0.91/1.14 41:0 42:0 43:0 44:0 45:0 46:0 47:0 48:0 49:0 50:0
% 0.91/1.14 51:0 52:0 53:0 54:0 55:0 56:0 57:0 58:0 59:0 60:0
% 0.91/1.14 61:0 62:0 63:0 64:0 65:0 66:0 67:0 68:0 69:0 70:0
% 0.91/1.14 71:0 72:0 73:0 74:0 75:0 76:0 77:0 78:0 79:0 80:0
% 0.91/1.14 81:0 82:0 83:0 84:0 85:0 86:0 87:0 88:0 89:0 90:0
% 0.91/1.14 91:0 92:0 93:0 94:0 95:0 96:1 97:1 98:0 99:0
% 0.91/1.14 All others: 87.
% 0.91/1.14
% 0.91/1.14 ********** ABNORMAL END **********
% 0.91/1.14
% 0.91/1.14 ********** is_delete, can't find term.
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------