TSTP Solution File: SET677+3 by SPASS---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : SET677+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 05:28:02 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.21s 0.49s
% Output   : Refutation 0.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   28 (  12 unt;   0 nHn;  28 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   64 (   0 equ;  39 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   13 (  13 usr;   6 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(3,axiom,
    ilf_type(u,set_type),
    file('SET677+3.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(4,axiom,
    ilf_type(skc4,identity_relation_of_type(skc3)),
    file('SET677+3.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(5,axiom,
    subset(identity_relation_of(skc3),skc4),
    file('SET677+3.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(31,axiom,
    ( ~ equal(range__dfg(skc3,skc3,skc4),skc3)
    | ~ equal(domain__dfg(skc3,skc3,skc4),skc3) ),
    file('SET677+3.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(40,axiom,
    ( ~ ilf_type(u,identity_relation_of_type(v))
    | ~ ilf_type(v,set_type)
    | ~ ilf_type(u,set_type)
    | ilf_type(u,relation_type(v,v)) ),
    file('SET677+3.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(52,axiom,
    ( ~ ilf_type(u,set_type)
    | ~ ilf_type(v,set_type)
    | ~ ilf_type(w,relation_type(u,v))
    | equal(range__dfg(u,v,w),range_of(w)) ),
    file('SET677+3.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(54,axiom,
    ( ~ ilf_type(u,set_type)
    | ~ ilf_type(v,set_type)
    | ~ ilf_type(w,relation_type(u,v))
    | equal(domain__dfg(u,v,w),domain_of(w)) ),
    file('SET677+3.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(62,axiom,
    ( ~ ilf_type(u,set_type)
    | ~ ilf_type(v,set_type)
    | ~ ilf_type(w,relation_type(u,v))
    | ~ subset(identity_relation_of(v),w)
    | equal(range__dfg(u,v,w),v) ),
    file('SET677+3.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(65,axiom,
    ( ~ ilf_type(u,set_type)
    | ~ ilf_type(v,set_type)
    | ~ ilf_type(w,relation_type(v,u))
    | ~ subset(identity_relation_of(v),w)
    | equal(domain__dfg(v,u,w),v) ),
    file('SET677+3.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(92,plain,
    ( ~ ilf_type(u,identity_relation_of_type(v))
    | ilf_type(u,relation_type(v,v)) ),
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[40,3]),
    [iquote('0:MRR:40.1,40.2,3.0,3.0')] ).

cnf(97,plain,
    ( ~ ilf_type(u,relation_type(v,w))
    | equal(range__dfg(v,w,u),range_of(u)) ),
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[52,3]),
    [iquote('0:MRR:52.0,52.1,3.0,3.0')] ).

cnf(100,plain,
    ( ~ ilf_type(u,relation_type(v,w))
    | equal(domain__dfg(v,w,u),domain_of(u)) ),
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[54,3]),
    [iquote('0:MRR:54.0,54.1,3.0,3.0')] ).

cnf(108,plain,
    ( ~ ilf_type(u,set_type)
    | ~ ilf_type(v,set_type)
    | ~ ilf_type(w,relation_type(u,v))
    | ~ subset(identity_relation_of(v),w)
    | equal(range_of(w),v) ),
    inference(rew,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[97,62]),
    [iquote('0:Rew:97.1,62.4')] ).

cnf(109,plain,
    ( ~ ilf_type(u,relation_type(v,w))
    | ~ subset(identity_relation_of(w),u)
    | equal(range_of(u),w) ),
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[108,3]),
    [iquote('0:MRR:108.0,108.1,3.0,3.0')] ).

cnf(114,plain,
    ( ~ ilf_type(u,set_type)
    | ~ ilf_type(v,set_type)
    | ~ ilf_type(w,relation_type(v,u))
    | ~ subset(identity_relation_of(v),w)
    | equal(domain_of(w),v) ),
    inference(rew,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[100,65]),
    [iquote('0:Rew:100.1,65.4')] ).

cnf(115,plain,
    ( ~ ilf_type(u,relation_type(v,w))
    | ~ subset(identity_relation_of(v),u)
    | equal(domain_of(u),v) ),
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[114,3]),
    [iquote('0:MRR:114.0,114.1,3.0,3.0')] ).

cnf(119,plain,
    ( ~ ilf_type(skc4,relation_type(u,skc3))
    | equal(range_of(skc4),skc3) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[5,109]),
    [iquote('0:Res:5.0,109.1')] ).

cnf(120,plain,
    ( ~ ilf_type(skc4,relation_type(skc3,u))
    | equal(domain_of(skc4),skc3) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[5,115]),
    [iquote('0:Res:5.0,115.1')] ).

cnf(124,plain,
    ilf_type(skc4,relation_type(skc3,skc3)),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[4,92]),
    [iquote('0:Res:4.0,92.0')] ).

cnf(146,plain,
    equal(domain_of(skc4),skc3),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[124,120]),
    [iquote('0:Res:124.0,120.0')] ).

cnf(149,plain,
    equal(range_of(skc4),skc3),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[124,119]),
    [iquote('0:Res:124.0,119.0')] ).

cnf(289,plain,
    equal(range__dfg(skc3,skc3,skc4),range_of(skc4)),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[124,97]),
    [iquote('0:Res:124.0,97.0')] ).

cnf(294,plain,
    equal(range__dfg(skc3,skc3,skc4),skc3),
    inference(rew,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[149,289]),
    [iquote('0:Rew:149.0,289.0')] ).

cnf(295,plain,
    ( ~ equal(skc3,skc3)
    | ~ equal(domain__dfg(skc3,skc3,skc4),skc3) ),
    inference(rew,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[294,31]),
    [iquote('0:Rew:294.0,31.0')] ).

cnf(296,plain,
    ~ equal(domain__dfg(skc3,skc3,skc4),skc3),
    inference(obv,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[295]),
    [iquote('0:Obv:295.0')] ).

cnf(305,plain,
    equal(domain__dfg(skc3,skc3,skc4),domain_of(skc4)),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[124,100]),
    [iquote('0:Res:124.0,100.0')] ).

cnf(311,plain,
    equal(domain__dfg(skc3,skc3,skc4),skc3),
    inference(rew,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[146,305]),
    [iquote('0:Rew:146.0,305.0')] ).

cnf(312,plain,
    $false,
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[311,296]),
    [iquote('0:MRR:311.0,296.0')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.13  % Problem  : SET677+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.13/0.14  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Sun Jul 10 01:26:07 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.21/0.49  
% 0.21/0.49  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.21/0.49  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.21/0.49  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.21/0.49  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.21/0.49  SPASS derived 179 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 186 clauses.
% 0.21/0.49  SPASS allocated 97920 KBytes.
% 0.21/0.49  SPASS spent	0:00:00.12 on the problem.
% 0.21/0.49  		0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 0.21/0.49  		0:00:00.04 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.21/0.49  		0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.21/0.49  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.21/0.49  		0:00:00.02 for the reduction.
% 0.21/0.49  
% 0.21/0.49  
% 0.21/0.49  Here is a proof with depth 2, length 28 :
% 0.21/0.49  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.49  Formulae used in the proof : p34 prove_relset_1_44 p5 p32 p30 p2 p1
% 0.21/0.49  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------