TSTP Solution File: SET676+3 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : SET676+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 05:20:00 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.99s 1.20s
% Output   : Refutation 0.99s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : SET676+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Sun Jul 10 12:22:52 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.39  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.20/0.39  The process was started by sandbox on n005.cluster.edu,
% 0.20/0.39  Sun Jul 10 12:22:52 2022
% 0.20/0.39  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 24294.
% 0.20/0.39  
% 0.20/0.39  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.20/0.39  set(auto).
% 0.20/0.39     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.20/0.39     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.20/0.39     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.20/0.39     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.20/0.39     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.20/0.39     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.20/0.39     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.20/0.39     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.20/0.39     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.20/0.39     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.20/0.39     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.20/0.39     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.20/0.39     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.20/0.39  clear(print_given).
% 0.20/0.39  
% 0.20/0.39  formula_list(usable).
% 0.20/0.39  
% 0.20/0.39  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=9.
% 0.20/0.39  
% 0.20/0.39  This ia a non-Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 0.20/0.39  Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.20/0.39  unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.20/0.39  clauses in usable.
% 0.20/0.39  
% 0.20/0.39     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.20/0.39     dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.20/0.39     dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.20/0.39     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.20/0.39     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.20/0.39     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.20/0.39     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.20/0.39     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.20/0.39     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.20/0.39     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.20/0.39     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.20/0.39     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.20/0.39     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.20/0.39     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.20/0.39     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.20/0.39  
% 0.20/0.39  ------------> process usable:
% 0.20/0.39  
% 0.20/0.39  ------------> process sos:
% 0.20/0.39    Following clause subsumed by 140 during input processing: 0 [] {-} ilf_type($c1,set_type).
% 0.20/0.39  140 back subsumes 95.
% 0.20/0.39  140 back subsumes 94.
% 0.20/0.39  140 back subsumes 88.
% 0.20/0.39  140 back subsumes 87.
% 0.20/0.39  140 back subsumes 81.
% 0.20/0.39  140 back subsumes 72.
% 0.20/0.39  140 back subsumes 69.
% 0.20/0.39  140 back subsumes 48.
% 0.20/0.39  140 back subsumes 47.
% 0.20/0.39  140 back subsumes 46.
% 0.20/0.39  140 back subsumes 45.
% 0.20/0.39  140 back subsumes 44.
% 0.20/0.39  140 back subsumes 43.
% 0.20/0.39  140 back subsumes 36.
% 0.20/0.39  140 back subsumes 33.
% 0.20/0.39  140 back subsumes 32.
% 0.20/0.39  140 back subsumes 30.
% 0.20/0.39  140 back subsumes 25.
% 0.20/0.39  140 back subsumes 21.
% 0.20/0.39  140 back subsumes 13.
% 0.20/0.39  140 back subsumes 9.
% 0.20/0.39  140 back subsumes 3.
% 0.20/0.39  140 back subsumes 2.
% 0.20/0.39    Following clause subsumed by 141 during input processing: 0 [copy,141,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.20/0.39  
% 0.20/0.39  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.38/0.60  
% 0.38/0.60  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.38/0.60  
% 0.38/0.60  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.38/0.60  
% 0.38/0.60  
% 0.38/0.60  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.38/0.60  
% 0.38/0.60  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.38/0.60  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.38/0.60  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.38/0.60  number of clauses in intial UL: 114
% 0.38/0.60  number of clauses initially in problem: 116
% 0.38/0.60  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 98
% 0.38/0.60  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 0.38/0.60  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.38/0.60  absolute distinct symbol count: 25
% 0.38/0.60     distinct predicate count: 5
% 0.38/0.60     distinct function count: 18
% 0.38/0.60     distinct constant count: 2
% 0.38/0.60  
% 0.38/0.60  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.38/0.60  
% 0.38/0.60  
% 0.38/0.60  
% 0.38/0.60  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.38/0.60  
% 0.38/0.60  =========== start of search ===========
% 0.99/1.20  
% 0.99/1.20  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 0.99/1.20  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.99/1.20  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.99/1.20  
% 0.99/1.20  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.99/1.20  
% 0.99/1.20  Model 2 [ 3 1 811 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.99/1.20  
% 0.99/1.20  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.99/1.20  
% 0.99/1.20  Model 3 [ 2 0 3787 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.99/1.20  
% 0.99/1.20  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.99/1.20  
% 0.99/1.20  Model 4 [ 1 2 13502 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.99/1.20  
% 0.99/1.20  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.99/1.20  
% 0.99/1.20  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.99/1.20  
% 0.99/1.20  Model 5 [ 3 0 933 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.99/1.20  
% 0.99/1.20  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.99/1.20  
% 0.99/1.20  Model 6 [ 2 0 3597 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.99/1.20  
% 0.99/1.20  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.99/1.20  
% 0.99/1.20  Model 7 [ 3 1 1581 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.99/1.20  
% 0.99/1.20  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.99/1.20  
% 0.99/1.20  Model 8 [ 5 0 2344 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.99/1.20  
% 0.99/1.20  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   0.82 sec ----> 174 [binary,173.1,41.1] {-} $F.
% 0.99/1.20  
% 0.99/1.20  Length of proof is 2.  Level of proof is 2.
% 0.99/1.20  
% 0.99/1.20  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 0.99/1.20  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.99/1.20  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.99/1.20  
% 0.99/1.20  1 [] {+} -ilf_type(A,set_type)| -ilf_type(B,set_type)|ilf_type(cross_product(A,B),relation_type(A,B)).
% 0.99/1.20  11 [] {+} -ilf_type(A,set_type)| -ilf_type(B,set_type)|ilf_type(B,identity_relation_of_type(A))| -ilf_type(B,relation_type(A,A)).
% 0.99/1.20  41 [] {+} -ilf_type(cross_product($c1,$c1),identity_relation_of_type($c1)).
% 0.99/1.20  140 [] {-} ilf_type(A,set_type).
% 0.99/1.20  152 [hyper,140,1,140] {+} ilf_type(cross_product(A,B),relation_type(A,B)).
% 0.99/1.20  173 [hyper,152,11,140,140] {-} ilf_type(cross_product(A,A),identity_relation_of_type(A)).
% 0.99/1.20  174 [binary,173.1,41.1] {-} $F.
% 0.99/1.20  
% 0.99/1.20  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.99/1.20  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 0.99/1.20  
% 0.99/1.20  
% 0.99/1.20  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.99/1.20  
% 0.99/1.20  
% 0.99/1.20  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.99/1.20  
% 0.99/1.20  ============ end of search ============
% 0.99/1.20  
% 0.99/1.20  ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 0.99/1.20  
% 0.99/1.20  true clauses given           3      (25.0%)
% 0.99/1.20  false clauses given          9
% 0.99/1.20  
% 0.99/1.20        FALSE     TRUE
% 0.99/1.20     6  0         3
% 0.99/1.20     7  2         0
% 0.99/1.20     8  1         2
% 0.99/1.20     9  1         0
% 0.99/1.20    10  0         1
% 0.99/1.20    13  1         0
% 0.99/1.20    23  0         1
% 0.99/1.20  tot:  5         7      (58.3% true)
% 0.99/1.20  
% 0.99/1.20  
% 0.99/1.20  Model 8 [ 5 0 2344 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.99/1.20  
% 0.99/1.20  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 0.99/1.20  
% 0.99/1.20  Process 24294 finished Sun Jul 10 12:22:52 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------