TSTP Solution File: SET676+3 by Duper---1.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Duper---1.0
% Problem  : SET676+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : duper %s

% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 14:47:20 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 3.79s 3.97s
% Output   : Proof 3.79s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem    : SET676+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.00/0.13  % Command    : duper %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime   : Sat Aug 26 12:26:23 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 3.79/3.97  SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.79/3.97  SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 3.79/3.97  Clause #0 (by assumption #[]): Eq
% 3.79/3.97    (∀ (B : Iota),
% 3.79/3.97      ilf_type B set_type → ∀ (C : Iota), ilf_type C set_type → ilf_type (cross_product B C) (relation_type B C))
% 3.79/3.97    True
% 3.79/3.97  Clause #3 (by assumption #[]): Eq
% 3.79/3.97    (∀ (B : Iota),
% 3.79/3.97      ilf_type B set_type →
% 3.79/3.97        ∀ (C : Iota),
% 3.79/3.97          ilf_type C set_type → Iff (ilf_type C (identity_relation_of_type B)) (ilf_type C (relation_type B B)))
% 3.79/3.97    True
% 3.79/3.97  Clause #18 (by assumption #[]): Eq (∀ (B : Iota), ilf_type B set_type) True
% 3.79/3.97  Clause #19 (by assumption #[]): Eq (Not (∀ (B : Iota), ilf_type B set_type → ilf_type (cross_product B B) (identity_relation_of_type B))) True
% 3.79/3.97  Clause #20 (by clausification #[18]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (ilf_type a set_type) True
% 3.79/3.97  Clause #34 (by clausification #[19]): Eq (∀ (B : Iota), ilf_type B set_type → ilf_type (cross_product B B) (identity_relation_of_type B)) False
% 3.79/3.97  Clause #35 (by clausification #[34]): ∀ (a : Iota),
% 3.79/3.97    Eq
% 3.79/3.97      (Not
% 3.79/3.97        (ilf_type (skS.0 0 a) set_type →
% 3.79/3.97          ilf_type (cross_product (skS.0 0 a) (skS.0 0 a)) (identity_relation_of_type (skS.0 0 a))))
% 3.79/3.97      True
% 3.79/3.97  Clause #36 (by clausification #[35]): ∀ (a : Iota),
% 3.79/3.97    Eq
% 3.79/3.97      (ilf_type (skS.0 0 a) set_type →
% 3.79/3.97        ilf_type (cross_product (skS.0 0 a) (skS.0 0 a)) (identity_relation_of_type (skS.0 0 a)))
% 3.79/3.97      False
% 3.79/3.97  Clause #38 (by clausification #[36]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (ilf_type (cross_product (skS.0 0 a) (skS.0 0 a)) (identity_relation_of_type (skS.0 0 a))) False
% 3.79/3.97  Clause #46 (by clausification #[0]): ∀ (a : Iota),
% 3.79/3.97    Eq (ilf_type a set_type → ∀ (C : Iota), ilf_type C set_type → ilf_type (cross_product a C) (relation_type a C)) True
% 3.79/3.97  Clause #47 (by clausification #[46]): ∀ (a : Iota),
% 3.79/3.97    Or (Eq (ilf_type a set_type) False)
% 3.79/3.97      (Eq (∀ (C : Iota), ilf_type C set_type → ilf_type (cross_product a C) (relation_type a C)) True)
% 3.79/3.97  Clause #48 (by clausification #[47]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota),
% 3.79/3.97    Or (Eq (ilf_type a set_type) False)
% 3.79/3.97      (Eq (ilf_type a_1 set_type → ilf_type (cross_product a a_1) (relation_type a a_1)) True)
% 3.79/3.97  Clause #49 (by clausification #[48]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota),
% 3.79/3.97    Or (Eq (ilf_type a set_type) False)
% 3.79/3.97      (Or (Eq (ilf_type a_1 set_type) False) (Eq (ilf_type (cross_product a a_1) (relation_type a a_1)) True))
% 3.79/3.97  Clause #50 (by forward demodulation #[49, 20]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota),
% 3.79/3.97    Or (Eq True False)
% 3.79/3.97      (Or (Eq (ilf_type a set_type) False) (Eq (ilf_type (cross_product a_1 a) (relation_type a_1 a)) True))
% 3.79/3.97  Clause #51 (by clausification #[50]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Or (Eq (ilf_type a set_type) False) (Eq (ilf_type (cross_product a_1 a) (relation_type a_1 a)) True)
% 3.79/3.97  Clause #52 (by forward demodulation #[51, 20]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Or (Eq True False) (Eq (ilf_type (cross_product a a_1) (relation_type a a_1)) True)
% 3.79/3.97  Clause #53 (by clausification #[52]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Eq (ilf_type (cross_product a a_1) (relation_type a a_1)) True
% 3.79/3.97  Clause #154 (by clausification #[3]): ∀ (a : Iota),
% 3.79/3.97    Eq
% 3.79/3.97      (ilf_type a set_type →
% 3.79/3.97        ∀ (C : Iota),
% 3.79/3.97          ilf_type C set_type → Iff (ilf_type C (identity_relation_of_type a)) (ilf_type C (relation_type a a)))
% 3.79/3.97      True
% 3.79/3.97  Clause #155 (by clausification #[154]): ∀ (a : Iota),
% 3.79/3.97    Or (Eq (ilf_type a set_type) False)
% 3.79/3.97      (Eq
% 3.79/3.97        (∀ (C : Iota),
% 3.79/3.97          ilf_type C set_type → Iff (ilf_type C (identity_relation_of_type a)) (ilf_type C (relation_type a a)))
% 3.79/3.97        True)
% 3.79/3.97  Clause #156 (by clausification #[155]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota),
% 3.79/3.97    Or (Eq (ilf_type a set_type) False)
% 3.79/3.97      (Eq (ilf_type a_1 set_type → Iff (ilf_type a_1 (identity_relation_of_type a)) (ilf_type a_1 (relation_type a a)))
% 3.79/3.97        True)
% 3.79/3.97  Clause #157 (by clausification #[156]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota),
% 3.79/3.97    Or (Eq (ilf_type a set_type) False)
% 3.79/3.97      (Or (Eq (ilf_type a_1 set_type) False)
% 3.79/3.97        (Eq (Iff (ilf_type a_1 (identity_relation_of_type a)) (ilf_type a_1 (relation_type a a))) True))
% 3.79/3.97  Clause #158 (by clausification #[157]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota),
% 3.79/3.97    Or (Eq (ilf_type a set_type) False)
% 3.79/3.97      (Or (Eq (ilf_type a_1 set_type) False)
% 3.79/3.97        (Or (Eq (ilf_type a_1 (identity_relation_of_type a)) True) (Eq (ilf_type a_1 (relation_type a a)) False)))
% 3.79/3.98  Clause #160 (by forward demodulation #[158, 20]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota),
% 3.79/3.98    Or (Eq True False)
% 3.79/3.98      (Or (Eq (ilf_type a set_type) False)
% 3.79/3.98        (Or (Eq (ilf_type a (identity_relation_of_type a_1)) True) (Eq (ilf_type a (relation_type a_1 a_1)) False)))
% 3.79/3.98  Clause #161 (by clausification #[160]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota),
% 3.79/3.98    Or (Eq (ilf_type a set_type) False)
% 3.79/3.98      (Or (Eq (ilf_type a (identity_relation_of_type a_1)) True) (Eq (ilf_type a (relation_type a_1 a_1)) False))
% 3.79/3.98  Clause #162 (by forward demodulation #[161, 20]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota),
% 3.79/3.98    Or (Eq True False)
% 3.79/3.98      (Or (Eq (ilf_type a (identity_relation_of_type a_1)) True) (Eq (ilf_type a (relation_type a_1 a_1)) False))
% 3.79/3.98  Clause #163 (by clausification #[162]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota),
% 3.79/3.98    Or (Eq (ilf_type a (identity_relation_of_type a_1)) True) (Eq (ilf_type a (relation_type a_1 a_1)) False)
% 3.79/3.98  Clause #164 (by superposition #[163, 53]): ∀ (a : Iota), Or (Eq (ilf_type (cross_product a a) (identity_relation_of_type a)) True) (Eq False True)
% 3.79/3.98  Clause #166 (by clausification #[164]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (ilf_type (cross_product a a) (identity_relation_of_type a)) True
% 3.79/3.98  Clause #245 (by superposition #[38, 166]): Eq True False
% 3.79/3.98  Clause #246 (by clausification #[245]): False
% 3.79/3.98  SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------